You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Truthfully I have no real interest in trying to learn to drive the car differently…
When I had my 2016 Chevy Volt, I averaged 7000 miles electric and 5000 miles gas each year. But now I own a Tesla MYLR, and it's all electric. But it is surprising that people wouldn't plug their hybrid cars in!This is a very good point. In Europe, they are having a similar issue with plug-in hybrids (and I suspect the same here). The government has found that people aren't really plugging them in, so the claimed fuel and emissions savings aren't happening irl. So, many countries are eliminating any incentives for purchasing plug-in hybrids. Kyle Conner at Out of Spec reviews just did a video specifically on this issue in Germany, where companies can reimburse their executives for gas costs but not charging costs, so the ones that drive hybrids as company cars tend to never plug them in.
There are multiple factors at play.The OP has clearly stated he does not WANT to adjust his driving style. Combined with the possibility that he just CAN'T make the adjustment, I still think he simply bought the wrong car.
My wife refuses to even try, and that's mostly because she just doesn't want to, or need to, so "why bother?".
Sadly, across ALL manufacturers, it's dangerous to make the assumption that the new car you buy has ALL of the features of the one you test drove. Changes occur all...the...time...There are multiple factors at play.
However one of them, and it’s very important to me, is that the feature existed on my prior Tesla M3 and doesn’t exist on the MY.
I can’t imagine why anyone would make the assumption they would take that setting away?!
…and yes, I do have nerve damage.
It’s actually somewhat worse with Tesla - most manufacturers only make changes once a year. Tesla does so almost continuously. That’s good if it’s a feature you want but if it’s removing something you want it’s not so good. It’s also a bit frustrating because the features that are present when you order your car may be quite different from those on the car you receive several months later.Sadly, across ALL manufacturers, it's dangerous to make the assumption that the new car you buy has ALL of the features of the one you test drove. Changes occur all...the...time...
I guess "somewhat worse" is partially true. My experience with VAG is there were continual changes within the same model year, catching buyers and salespeople offguard.It’s actually somewhat worse with Tesla - most manufacturers only make changes once a year. Tesla does so almost continuously. That’s good if it’s a feature you want but if it’s removing something you want it’s not so good. It’s also a bit frustrating because the features that are present when you order your car may be quite different from those on the car you receive several months later.
My MYLR from 2020 does have the option to reduce regenerative braking which is interesting because this is strictly a software feature, not a hardware one.
Among other things it’s helpful in slippery winter conditions. I’d be annoyed if I got a new Tesla without it.
Very cool.How about using ingenext bonus module seems to do everything we are talking about here. Anybody tried the new Ryzen model,?
Care to elaborate on this comment?S3XY buttons does resolve that issue. (However they are a serious security vulnerability.)
For example, if you have a pin on the glovebox, the buttons by-pass that. It’s likely that if that device can be used to program other functionality, it can be used to by-pass other security enabled functions.Care to elaborate on this comment?
Hmmm, it does sound like a serious vulnerability.For example, if you have a pin on the glovebox, the buttons by-pass that. It’s likely that if that device can be used to program other functionality, it can be used to by-pass other security enabled functions.
That sounds like a choice to enable a button to open the glove box and opt for convenience over security, not an intrinsic vulnerability in the SEXY buttons.For example, if you have a pin on the glovebox, the buttons by-pass that. It’s likely that if that device can be used to program other functionality, it can be used to by-pass other security enabled functions.
There are a lot bigger things to worry about than your glove box... I mean a $6 Wonder Bar will get your glove box open, or even a screwdriver and they have to get in your vehicle to begin with.The nature of those kind of vulnerabilities that have already bypassed security is that they can probably be used bypass other aspects of security.
it doesn’t sound serious until it’s used to commit something that is much more serious.
I'm pretty sure that Telsa would have immediately resolved that vulnerability immediately when they became aware of it.Wow. That is a disturbing security vulnerability. More so because the newly programmed keys never show up!