You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
makes sense. Thanksthe EQ should really be flat with the bass adjusted to taste and highend adjusted for hearing loss and position...
Some people dont like the forward mids and cut a couple of db there. theres no point going nuts on the EQ.
This my setting. It's work good enough for me
I'm not trying to be snarky but I like to move the sliders to where they make the music sound good to me.
I'm not trying to be snarky but I like to move the sliders to where they make the music sound good to me.
That's surprising that he's a musician as those settings are terrible for reasons explained in post #5. You would expect a musician to gravitate to unaltered music rather than heavily modified and noisy as he set it up. In most cases you are better off cutting problem frequencies rather than boosting them.
...so the brain isnt fooled into something sounding better by it being louder.
If "fooling" my brain is what it takes to have a more enjoyable listening experience I'm cool with that.
I Iike what I like.
Does your opinion change when you learn the listener has cookie bite or high frequency hearing loss? Surely you have to understand that not everyone hears sounds the same way as you do, especially those over 50 years old.
This. Very much this.the issue with this EQ setting is that your are using an EQ for something its not meant to do. You introduce phasing artifacts and smearing. And if you boost every frequeny why dont you just remove 2 db off every single one and then the ratio is the same at least (if you are keen on the smilie curve). Or why dont you just leave bass and highend at 0 and then subtract the mids. That EQ will make the system sound like *****.
You are also going to trigger the multiband limiter and clipper...