You're taking me out of context to make a false statement. An 11.7 may make you number 132 on the Dragy list, but that's still in the average range of people who review and report on Model 3s who aren't drag racers. People who use Dragy and report it are not the typical Model 3 Performance owners or reviewers, and represent only a small percentage of people who post their times on Youtube, forums, and other places. We generally don't know what they've done to their cars or how they get the times they do.
What I'd like to know is what the Dragy folks, like yourself, do different from the typical reviewer/user, and what actually makes the biggest difference. Is just making sure that the battery is almost fully charged and up to temperature enough to make a .2 second difference in the 1/4 compared to a car with a 70%+ charge? Or taking bits and pieces out of the car to lighten it? Or times with and without rollout? Sample to sample variation? Or ?
The majority of reviewers out there who have done 1/4 mile times with totally stock Model 3 Performance get times in the 11.7 range.
The Carwow video previously linked.
Dragtimes -
TFL Now -
Car and Driver managed a 11.6 -
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a36329678/2019-tesla-model-3-performance-by-the-numbers/
But Road and Track got an 11.8 -
https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/road-tests/a22625274/tesla-model-3-performance-track-test/