Old constant was 153Wh/km actually and the capacity was the same, 77.8
@TimothyHW3 is actually right about this. I said 152Wh/rkm, but it's actually probably closer to 153Wh/rkm. It's actually somewhere in between, I believe. But I think closer to 153Wh/rkm. I'm happy to hear that he's not insisting it is 156Wh/rkm anymore, so that's great!
The V is SOC dependant. You get 400V at above 80%...Again a lot of misinformation thrown your way...
You have to take a screenshot at 100% of cell voltage to see the cell voltage and if it is at 4.2V then you are topped out.
Timothy is right about this too. I
thought @EV Promoter had posted a picture of his 100% charge (but he hadn't). So that prior post of mine is wrong. As I asked earlier in this thread, it would be good to see the 100% voltage on that pack. Then it can be compared to known ~77.8kWh pack results.
But anyway. You have 96 bricks in series. SMT is showing you the max and min values. If you just take the average value and multiply by 96 you'll get pretty close to the total. In your particular screen capture, 3.968V*96 = 381V.
You'll just have to see what happens if you charge to a higher SoC, and compare to some of Bjorn's videos or something. At the moment all we can say is that it is TBD (the 381V vs. 375V is wrong, as I said - I thought you were at 100% in both but obviously you were far from that).
Yeah, and now it's 74.6kWh, with about 6 volts more voltage (385V vs. 379V or whatever).
To me, that seems to show conclusively that this pack is currently top-locked.
(Again, these observations are wrong, because the SMT capture was not at 100%. I thought they were, but they're nowhere near.)
As mentioned, the voltage is pretty flat for a wide range of SoC, and then as you get close to 100%, the voltage goes up quite rapidly. The real question is what is it at your 100%, and how does that compare to Bjorn's 100% value (or someone else's).