Pretty sure 18" Titans only come in 8.5Wheel width? Those tires look just the slightest bit stretched.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure 18" Titans only come in 8.5Wheel width? Those tires look just the slightest bit stretched.
Wheel width? Those tires look just the slightest bit stretched.
Gotcha. Maybe it’s just the angle then. Any meaningful results vs the stock 20”?8.5” (Stock 18” tires)
After flip flopping a few times I decided I will order a set of 18x8.5 MW03 (If I had a regular AWD I’d even go 7.5) and determine what rubber I’ll put on once they arrive but at just under 18#/corner should be helpful.
Mrs negged them for the time being since her MY is impending but I may float them and list my 20’s up to recover the expense.Did you get your MW03’s yet?
I may order a set later this summer, but can’t decide between 18” or 19”.
That is some impressive weight for those 20" front wheels/tires.Weighed my tires/wheels today.
Titan 7 (18”) OEM Michelins
Signature SV104 (staggered 20”) Michelin PS4S
Yes can anyone can share some efficiency numbers (in terms of range, acceleration, etc.)? I m considering to have a 18x8.5 MW03 with OEM 18” tires.Let's get some efficiency numbers going for these no?
I would probably end up trying the cheap tire challenge that Kyle from OOS has been messing with. Impressive for $55-70/corner for the Sentury or Nankang’s.Yes can anyone can share some efficiency numbers (in terms of range, acceleration, etc.)? I m considering to have a 18x8.5 MW03 with OEM 18” tires.
Miles Avg Avg Elev Energy
Driven Speed Temp Change (Wh/mi)
54.0 60.7 64 157 303
129.2 66.4 68 236 306
122.9 67.6 84 246 277
111.0 69.8 86 -252 309
168.5 71.2 70 253 345
70.1 74.4 77 -155 297
68.3 74.5 63 46 290
205.3 75.6 75 344 278
144.5 77.4 59 98 348
183.8 77.5 48 377 328
111.2 77.5 70 -180 361
Miles Avg Avg Elev Energy
Driven Speed Temp Change (Wh/mi)
135.7 63.8 36 -357 249
47.0 70.7 55 60 277
114.5 73.1 50 -123 310
184.9 78.2 41 105 320
82.2 80.1 34 76 299
133.3 83.4 41 -27 318
162.1 83.6 54 -214 317
162.0 83.8 43 214 326
46.5 87.8 36 80 364
91.5 88.1 30 -304 345
Thanks for your data! looks 18” definitely helps in consumption.I keep a very diligent log of my long-distance trips with lots of data points, so I'll share some that are relevant to this thread.
A few things to note on the way I log these trips:
- These are continuous drives on the highway, so there is no energy loss due to "idling" without moving
- All trips are at least 45 miles long to avoid short drives that are less meaningful
- The start and end of the trip, and hence data points collected, are both taken at highway speeds: after accelerating to join the highway, and before decelerating and taking the exit
- There are a lot more data points taken, such as date & time, locations, start and end RM, weather and road conditions, etc. which are not shown here as they don't seem to make as big an impact on efficiency as average speed, ambient temperature, and elevation change (and some of it is private)
- I've filtered out the trips that have high net elevation changes (over 500 feet in either direction), as those are more difficult to compare
- The only variable I don't record (yet) that can have a fairly significant impact is wind, as that can equate to a higher or lower average speed
With that out of the way, let's first look at my "baseline" data with the 20-inch wheels and PS4S tires that are stock on any M3P+, sorted by average speed:
Code:Miles Avg Avg Elev Energy Driven Speed Temp Change (Wh/mi) 54.0 60.7 64 157 303 129.2 66.4 68 236 306 122.9 67.6 84 246 277 111.0 69.8 86 -252 309 168.5 71.2 70 253 345 70.1 74.4 77 -155 297 68.3 74.5 63 46 290 205.3 75.6 75 344 278 144.5 77.4 59 98 348 183.8 77.5 48 377 328 111.2 77.5 70 -180 361
Now, let's examine the efficiency numbers with the 18" EV01+ wheels wrapped in Michelin MXM4 Primacy tires in stock sizes, again sorted by average speed:
Code:Miles Avg Avg Elev Energy Driven Speed Temp Change (Wh/mi) 135.7 63.8 36 -357 249 47.0 70.7 55 60 277 114.5 73.1 50 -123 310 184.9 78.2 41 105 320 82.2 80.1 34 76 299 133.3 83.4 41 -27 318 162.1 83.6 54 -214 317 162.0 83.8 43 214 326 46.5 87.8 36 80 364 91.5 88.1 30 -304 345
For similar speeds, this shows an energy consumption difference of about 20 to 50 Wh/mi, or roughly 5 to 15%, which is definitely not insignificant.
You'll note most average temperatures for trips taken with the 18" wheels were a fair bit colder, so I'll need to test again later this spring and summer when temps are higher again (and I have trips to take, once this shelter-in-place stuff is over).
So all in all, this bodes well for an average improvement in efficiency in the 10-12% range.
Finally, and as any good data deserves, here's a simple graph showing the energy consumption values over average speed for both wheel configurations:
View attachment 527807
Well that MAY be true. But there are 2 things going on here. 18" wheels and different tires. I think it is impossible to say which one caused the difference but my opinion is that it is mostly the tires. Tires with better traction usually have more rolling resistance.
Not unsurprising but I'd guess that the MP$S tires are not available in an 18" size that has the same outside diameter.
So it may well be impossible to test.
Yes lighter wheels are certainly better for lots of reasons. More sidewall is too.