Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Falcon Heavy - General Discussion

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Lots of info just dropped: SpaceX Reveals Potential Launch Date For Its Next Falcon Heavy Rocket — Forbes

  • NET March 7th for first (Arabsat) of two launches
  • Side boosters will RTLS, core to land on OCISLY
  • The best part:
Rumours suggest that the boosters on this launch could be flown again weeks later on a third Falcon Heavy flight. SpaceX is apparently considering a rapid turnaround of the boosters, having them ready to launch again in 60 days. This will be for the launch of the United States Air Force’s (USAF) Space Test Program 2 (STP-2), launching more than two dozen satellites for the US military.

The two FCC filling themselves:
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) 0026-EX-ST-2019 FCC Experimental License
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) 0028-EX-ST-2019 FCC Experimental License
 
  • Informative
Reactions: ohmman
That rumour part is from an excellent Teslarati article: SpaceX to attempt back-to-back Falcon Heavy launches with booster reuse in 2019

That article also spells out my initial thoughts on the re-use of the Arabsat boosters (my emphasis):
Teslarati said:
Whether or not this officially unconfirmed information is correct, it certainly sounds like just the thing that CEO Elon Musk might challenge SpaceX to pull off, not to mention the fact that this would place the US Air Force in a situation requiring it to become the first commercial customer to launch on a flight-proven Falcon Heavy. This would be a truly dramatic change in attitude compared to comments made in just the last week, brought up in the context of SpaceX’s planned December 18 (now Dec 22) launch of the USAF’s first next-gen GPS satellite, GPS III SV01. In official comments provided to the media, the Air Force was extremely “uncertain” about allowing SpaceX to even attempt to recover its Falcon 9 booster, let alone allowing the company to fly Air Force payloads on flight-proven rockets.
 
Lastly, regarding STP-2:
Teslarati said:
Falcon 9 could almost certainly launch STP-2 in a reusable configuration, but the USAF chose Falcon Heavy – and included literal dead weight – because the military branch is very interested in the rocket’s potential utility for more serious National Security Space missions.
Yes, SpaceX launching dead weight. I cannot help but think that slightly annoys a tiny part of Elon’s brain (“The humans, they are so inefficient. And they enjoy this zip-lining?”).
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Sean Wagner
Falcon Heavy making only second flight, but it’s already changing the game

Quote: “in the 14 months since the large rocket's inaugural flight, Falcon Heavy has had a remarkable effect on the nation's space policy. In three key areas—national defense, science, and human exploration—the Falcon Heavy rocket has to some extent changed the discussion. As it turns out, the demand was there for a low-cost, heavy-lift booster.”
 
Confirmed they will reuse the side boosters from Arabsat 6A on STP-2. SpaceX wasn't sure of the center core recovery and the wear and tear on such a rough landing. So STP-2 will use a brand new center core. Coming up pretty soon.


And then there's this too!

Screenshot_20190411-193251.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVM
Moderator interruption. A quick reminder that this thread is about general Falcon Heavy rocket discussion. Posts about a particular FH launch should be made in the launch thread.

I expect todays launch will have an effect on Falcon Heavies market. More satellite companies will consider the upgrade to the FH to get their satellite in place faster and with more fuel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Electroman