You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bush Approves $17.4 Billion Auto Bailout
Carmakers Told to Make Sweeping Changes Next Year
By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN and DAVID E. SANGER 3 minutes ago
The $13.4 billion in short-term financing and $4 billion at a later date are intended to prevent the collapse of General Motors and Chrysler.
- Times Topics: Auto Industry Bailout | Credit Crisis
- Stocks Rise on Auto Bailout 9:59 AM ET
Post a Comment | Read (117)
Doug Mills/The New York Times
The president’s plan gives carmakers until March 30 to restructure.
The money to aid the automakers will come from the Treasury’s $700 billion financial stabilization fund and shortly after Mr. Bush’s announcement, the Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., who will oversee the aid to the auto industry, said Congress would need to release the second $350 billion for that program in short order.
Well the $25E9 from the ATVM was off the table since the bailout failed to pass in the senate before congress ended session some days ago.
Yes, it passed back in September. It's just the Congress failed to convert it into a bailout without the "advanced technology" part. Actually if you go back to the beginning of this thread you can see how it evolved. (And how Yahoo Finance articles suffer from link rot!)So the ATVM still exists..?
True, but in that case law didn't change. Just how the Executive chose how to enforce it.The $700B was off the table over the summer, so I never assume things are solid in Washington. In money and politics things are always... fluid...
A surprisingly insightful and intuitive observation.In money and politics things are always... fluid...
doug said:
A surprisingly insightful and intuitive observation.
During the hearings for an auto bailout, there was plenty said about America’s carmakers and the United Auto Workers. Some criticism was dead on, but much of it was either way off base or exaggerated. As is most often the case when rhetoric and politics rule the day, the truth really lies in nuance. Here’s our Detroit team, David Kiley and David Welch, to sort out the fact from the hot air:
"Josh Whedon", huh?Hee... paraphrasing a Joss Whedon line, actually. I take no credit :smile:
The White House granted General Motors and Chrysler a reprieve Friday when it authorized $17.4 billion in emergency loans. President Bush said the alternative – the collapse of two American icons – was “not a responsible course of action.”
It’s impossible to say whether loans from the Treasury Department’s $700 billion financial stabilization fund will revive Detroit. No one knows whether Chrysler – which paid off its 1979 bailout loan and handed a nice profit to the federal government – can return from the brink again.
But the administration and Congress clearly charted a “responsible course” in preserving the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program.
In fact, the opposite is true. Tesla, which is already selling powertrains for use in other automakers’ vehicles, has a deeply vested interest in a robust economy and proliferation of viable automakers. If any manufacturer in Detroit, Tokyo or Stuttgart ceases operations, Tesla could lose a potential partner.
Do we know who is already buying Tesla drivetrains?