I'm not sure i understand why you think 10-12 stalls are better than 2 stations with 6 stalls maybe 30 or 40 miles apart. The later would appear to offer a lot more flexibility depending on where people come from and go to.
Can you explain the logic (or likely, the math)?
In terms of total charging capacity without significant queues (less than 2% chance), 1 Supercharger with 12 stalls has an average usage of 6.6 cars charging at once, but 2 Superchargers each with 6 stalls have an average usage of 2.25 at the same 2% queue chance. That means that 2 Superchargers with 6 stalls each, have an average capacity of 4.5 cars charging, while the single Supercharger with 12 stalls has a capacity of 6.6. That gives the single 12-stall Supercharger 47% better capacity than the two 6-stall Superchargers.
It's very similar to waiting for a bank teller. There are smaller total queues and the average wait time is less if there is one queue for two tellers than if each teller has its own queue. On top of that, I am sure that it is cheaper for Tesla to build 1 12-stall Supercharger than to build 2 6-stall Superchargers.
OTOH, convenience and flexibility are very important, but once there are enough spaced out for convenience and flexibility, the busy ones have to have enough stalls. That is why the Superchargers in Lusk and Gallup have 4 stalls while Gilroy and Centralia have 10 stalls. In hindsight, Tesla should have outfitted Hawthorne with 10 or 12 stalls, but the showcase, Space-X location just does not have much room left. Hopefully, the extra dot near Hawthorne on the "coming soon" map will be online soon and have a lot of stalls.