ChadS
Last tank of gas: March 2009
On a slightly more serious note with regard to your first point about people digging in on a position...
My current theory (I haven't spent nearly as much time thinking about this one) is that this behavior typically appears on complex subjects with many variables. They don't have to have great meaning, just many aspects to consider. People are bad at making decisions when there are more than about 4 variables. So, for example, smartphone operating systems - there's the UI, development interfaces, available hardware, pricing, distribution schemes, performance, security, default ties to other ecosystems, available apps, etc. Just too many things to consider. So rather than consider the various attributes and note some are best done by OS1 and some are done best by OS2...they instead make an emotional attachment to one. Once the arguing is based on emotion rather than logic...well, that's when you fanbois can just shut up, because MY system is so much better. Why can't you see the obvious truth?
Government? Environment? Economics? Cars (regardless of propulsion)? All very complex. Most people are rational and can see good and bad aspects to any solution, but the people that get emotionally attached to a particular one are the ones that feel the greatest need to be vocal, because they KNOW they are right. Not many people are that way, but we sure hear a lot from them. And their solutions are repetitive and very simple. Always buy an iPhone, or a Ford. Just get the government out. Or just have the government take control of those greedy corporations. Either way, THAT will fix all the problems.
My current theory (I haven't spent nearly as much time thinking about this one) is that this behavior typically appears on complex subjects with many variables. They don't have to have great meaning, just many aspects to consider. People are bad at making decisions when there are more than about 4 variables. So, for example, smartphone operating systems - there's the UI, development interfaces, available hardware, pricing, distribution schemes, performance, security, default ties to other ecosystems, available apps, etc. Just too many things to consider. So rather than consider the various attributes and note some are best done by OS1 and some are done best by OS2...they instead make an emotional attachment to one. Once the arguing is based on emotion rather than logic...well, that's when you fanbois can just shut up, because MY system is so much better. Why can't you see the obvious truth?
Government? Environment? Economics? Cars (regardless of propulsion)? All very complex. Most people are rational and can see good and bad aspects to any solution, but the people that get emotionally attached to a particular one are the ones that feel the greatest need to be vocal, because they KNOW they are right. Not many people are that way, but we sure hear a lot from them. And their solutions are repetitive and very simple. Always buy an iPhone, or a Ford. Just get the government out. Or just have the government take control of those greedy corporations. Either way, THAT will fix all the problems.
Last edited: