It's easy to blame a jaywalker this time but what if it's a deer, bear, dog, chicken... crossing the road?
No one goes to jail in a non-human case but the driverless reputation would be very much damaged!
Like I said before, there is no doubt that in a fatal jaywalker incidence, most likely the fault belongs to the dead jaywalker because the dead can't speak to defense themselves.
It's very disturbing that police and news have been biased against a jaywalker by painting a picture that she came from nowhere suddenly, she darted out at the last second, she jumped out of the dark shadows...
She was traveling like 1 mile per hour as if she's a tortoise and the car was traveling at 40 MPH as if it's a runaway hippopotamus race and the hippopotamus would say the telephone pole just suddenly darted out from the dark, the tree just jumped out from nowhere suddenly.
It's very unethical to trick the public with the very dark video as if the streetlights were not bright enough while other Youtubers were able to prove otherwise.
The bias against jaywalker may be explained by the following clip: Cars that killed have successfully blamed their victims:
In a lawsuit, jurors will have to assign negligence and thanks to records,
1) The jaywalker didn't use crosswalk so that's negligence.
2) Human driver was intentionally distracted, that's also negligence
3) The driverless system didn't protect the jaywalker, that too is negligence.
4) The State that allows the system that does not respect jaywalkers' lives is also negligence!