ZachF
Active Member
We gonna get 6,000 pages before 2020?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reading through the German Forum it sounds indeed as if the new regulation will be active early in Jan. Many people have been waiting with their orders as its partly a 50% increase of the incentive or €2k which is significant.
No reason comes to my mind with the authority would ask people to wait while they do the required regulation changes until Jan 2nd and then ask to wait longer which would not be in the interest of any party.
Sounds reasonable to me that we will have an incremental wave of orders that did wait for that moment in Q1 in Germany.
Yeah, sounds like they just gave wind/solar providers a free cushion of cash to use for lobbying officials with strippers and trips to the Bahamas so they choose more wind and solar vs the race to the bottom on $/kwh for the accountants. I guess coal got tired of all of the stories about how cheap wind and solar is and how there is free electricity in Texas at night.Exactly, that's my take too: the Trump administration just forced renewable energy providers into a highly lucrative, high margin energy pricing cartel, without much of an advantage to coal based generators.
Bad for emissions, totally good for green energy providers - unless we missed some additional shenanigans.
Maybe @brian45011 can offer some insight?
I suggest combining those two bullet points into something like:
Customers awaiting cars in multiple markets: list
Tesla prioritizes deliveries to markets with looming subsidy or tax deadlines, Q4 was US & NL
Customers are awaiting delivery in deferred or new markets, most likely including:
Iceland
England
Ireland,
Norway
South Korea
China -> New GF3 orders not filled until Q2
... haven’t seen any estimates of the number of customers waiting but it is a tailwind nonetheless
I believe there are still countries where Tesla accepted reservations for Model 3 and customers are still waiting, including India, although not relevant to Q1 2020
Maybe, but solar installation is IMO hard to ramp, and winter is also not the best season to do it in most of the northern hemisphere. I'd like to be pleasantly surprised about solar, but it's been in hibernation for a long time.
In Q1 battery cells and packs, will still be delivered to GF3 from the USA. So unless there is some major increase in GF1 cell production my wild assumption based on very incomplete information is that Tesla will not counter the seasonal lower demand with price drops because they want to send battery packs to GF3. In Q2 there will be Chinese battery production and Model Y so there will be more battery supply and much more demand as well.I am of the same opinion. The Shorts will be screaming how it is a sign of a drop in demand and use it to try and push the SP down.
We almost need someone like Fact Checking to do the bullet list of push-down BS that should be looked out for 2020.
Having also worked in Public Accounting for one of the Big Accounting firms for 10 years, I can tell you that even though there are Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for cost accounting, companies often have slight variations in how they apply and interpret GAAP. So my comments below may not be consistent with what Tesla is doing but it should be very close.
Anyone noticed what didn’t happen?
We don’t have an EoQ push email leak yet.
The California Solar Roof Mandate goes into effect in 2020. Every one of the ~80K new homes built per year in California will require solar. California’s rooftop solar mandate will normalize clean energyMaybe, but solar installation is IMO hard to ramp, and winter is also not the best season to do it in most of the northern hemisphere. I'd like to be pleasantly surprised about solar, but it's been in hibernation for a long time.
Doesn't blue mean Tesla is free to operate? Or are you saying that all the blue states can't have service centers either? (The map says only states in red, without an exception, can't have service centers.)
Washington has Service Center and Sales.
The map has Washington colored red (automakers cannot direct sell or service vehicles) but it has a blue logo which the map says means that automakers can direct sell. For the map to be accurate it would need to mean that automakers can direct sell and service.
Now that may be what the map intended to convey, but that's not what it actually says.
Moreover, initially battery packs, power train and seats are imported from the USA with transportation, duty, and higher labor cost.In my opinion that's correct. The MiC gross margins will not have the Fremont Model 3 ramp up margin problems; however, they won't be optimized until GF3 gets to full capacity. So although the MiC gross margins won't be bad, they will get even better once they are producing 3k per week vs the 1k we see now.
I assume that GF3 is Tesla's fully owned Chinese subsidiary so they will use the Chinese version of GAAP. Is that different in any substantial way from the USA rules?
This, unlike previous leaks, didn't include any specific figures and targets though.
So it's little more than a leaked EoQ motivational email, with very little market impact.
Previous leaks were far more substantial.
Moreover, initially battery packs, power train and seats are imported from the USA with transportation, duty, and higher labor cost.
Hmmm. From PJM - About PJM
My take, likely to be widely off the mark, is that this is actually a positive for renewables. If you're an electricity supplier to PJM, and you can sell to them at a price comparable to that of Coal, Nuclear or Gas, but have to match those prices, if your cost to produce (ex-subsidy) is less than those others, you make more margin. Now if the subsidies excluded push your price over that of the competition, you'd lose sales, but I don't think those eastern states have much in the way of subsidies for solar, and anyway I think the cost of solar is competitive even without subsidies, so it just encourages them to build even more?
Of course it sounds bad (and is certainly bad for the environment) so maybe it will help the shorts to spin some more.
They will want to make seats in China ASAP. They are expensive to move and can be cheaply in China.Moreover, initially battery packs, power train and seats are imported from the USA with transportation, duty, and higher labor cost.
To me, this indicates the stealth short burn is intact. Under promise, over-deliver.
You know Musk has been planning this for over a year. I can talk about this openly because TSLA short-sellers are more stubborn than oxen and more stupid than Dumb and Dumber. They came out with a movie after Dumb and Dumber for this very reason. It was called Dumb, Dumber and Dumbest. Tesla short-sellers are so dumb they wear the title "Dumbest" as a badge of honor because it ends in "best".