Agreed.
Nonetheless, it is still a pity that Tesla are marketing figures that are not achieveable in the real world.
Sell it as an 11.2 car and have everyone saying "it actually does it!" will get Tesla far more respect.
The series of shall we call them overenthusaistically stated specs just creates doubts and damages faith and trust, when then permeates more widely into other Tesla statements. The daft thing is they are so far ahead of the competition they simply dont need to do this.
I would debate that Tesla would have sold not one car less if they had called it 11.2, and quite possibly many more.
Understate and overperform ftw everytime.
Please do not be offended by my following comments gruf, as I mean no offense.
But I don't know what is so hard to understand about the P90DL being one of the most desirable sedans in the world today,
as is, and irrespective of all of this bull&%$# in here about 10.9.
Point me to any ICE performance car forum right now and show me a consensus of members in there who do not immensely respect the Tesla's straight line performance capabilities.
The only place where a couple of tenths difference is an issue, ...... indeed, not even a couple of tenths difference, .01516 seconds difference is an issue and in a car with a pano roof, is in here.
If you were to give a performance car enthusiast, particularly a performance sedan enthusiast a P90DL right now, just hand it to him free of charge, I highly doubt that he'd give it back to you because "no one on the internet has been able to get within .1516 seconds of 10.9 in it".
That should put the absurdity of this whole matter into perspective. No, the only place where this is even an "issue", is in here.
A mountain out of a molehill is all this amounts to. To say nothing of the fact which bhzmark keeps driving home, I wish I could shake his hand, and that's no stripped down version of the P90DL has a posted up time so far.