Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla Cargo Ship

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

Further down in the thread, it's revealed to be a 2-stroke turbo-diesel:

For the curious: displacement is almost two kiloliters PER CYLINDER
Bore: 960mm (almost a meter)
Stroke: 2500mm (so very undersquare)
Displacement: 1,828.7 liter per cyl
15-102 RPM (lol)
Piston weight: 5.5 t (12,000lb)

Being a 2-stroke, I wonder how much fuel is wasted into the exhaust? 10%? 20%? More?!
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Buckminster
Further down in the thread, it's revealed to be a 2-stroke turbo-diesel:

For the curious: displacement is almost two kiloliters PER CYLINDER
Bore: 960mm (almost a meter)
Stroke: 2500mm (so very undersquare)
Displacement: 1,828.7 liter per cyl
15-102 RPM (lol)
Piston weight: 5.5 t (12,000lb)

Being a 2-stroke, I wonder how much fuel is wasted into the exhaust? 10%? 20%? More?!
It's a turbocharged direct injection diesel, that's a lot different from a normally aspirated carburetor two stroke that uses the crankcase and has fuel mixture blow through. Two stoke diesels are more efficient than four stroke diesels, 50% vs 35%. At least when in a low speed long stroke configuration like marine engines.
 
Further down in the thread, it's revealed to be a 2-stroke turbo-diesel:

For the curious: displacement is almost two kiloliters PER CYLINDER
Bore: 960mm (almost a meter)
Stroke: 2500mm (so very undersquare)
Displacement: 1,828.7 liter per cyl
15-102 RPM (lol)
Piston weight: 5.5 t (12,000lb)

Being a 2-stroke, I wonder how much fuel is wasted into the exhaust? 10%? 20%? More?!
This engine just fascinates me with every characteristic being almost unbelievable including I’m sure its cost. According to most, this 2-stroke is super efficient for any diesel, about 50% which is amazing compared to 20%-30% efficiency that is far more typical. That said, however, this beast still can consume 3600 gallons of bunkers (heavy fuel oil with the consistency of tar) per hour. Again, PER HOUR. For that consumption you get 102rpm and almost 109,000 horsepower or about 80MW. That’s megawatts, with an “M.” The impressive Model3P generates a bit over 400 ft-lb of torque, not even a rounding error for the Wärtsilä’s over 5,600,000 ft-lb, needed to turn a 490ft/150m prop shaft that ends with a single, six-bladed huge (31.5ft/9.6m) and heavy (131 tons) prop on the Maersk container ship Emma to propel that beast up to 27knots (or more depending upon the information source), an incredible speed for a fully-loaded commercial vessel of its size.

Sorry for the diversion. Now back to your regularly-scheduled programming.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: petit_bateau