Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Remember that Tesla is a luxury car maker now
Tesla sells several expensive cars, but no luxury cars. They certainly compete with luxury cars for sales.
Investing in general should be treated with the same rigor as any other social science like economics.
Um, do you mean investing should be treated in a comical imitation of "rigorous"? Economists can't even agree on their definitions, never mind applying any sort of logic to their fantasies. Thus they never come to any agreement. I'm guessing you were being sarcastic, but maybe not.
 
crazy side affect of deleting/moving a lot of messages is that when I went to the "next page" I skipped how ever many messages you moved/deleted. If discoducky hadn't quoted this message I never would have seen it.

If you don't see someone quoting it you might have to quote yourself or repost it after a page passes just to be sure others don't miss it.
There are many ways to never see messages from mods. As they don't have any control (so we are told), the fact that their tools are utterly inadequate to their thankless task is not their fault. Following are some examples of problems and possible examples of solutions.

Properly speaking, whenever mods do anything to a post it should generate a non-ignorable message to the user who posted. Nope.

Mods addressing users with messages in thread should also generate a non-ignorable message to the user. Nope.

Mods making new rules for threads should cause such rules to appear as a non-ignorable message to anybody posting. Nope.

As things stand anybody can easily miss mods' messages within the thread if they skip pages of the thread or have the mod on ignore.
 

The number they use to get that figure is the total energy used to refine the gas including heating.

Slightly disingenuous but still a very impactful number that highlights how absurdly wasteful ICE cars are.

It's impossible to convert the total energy burden of refining into an equivalent amount of electricity in any meaningful way, but the raw energy converted into miles driven is a poignant comparison that should be repeated.
 
Is Elon Musk the Owner of OpenAI? A Closer Look | by Bisma Farrukh medium.com › Jan 13, 2023

Also:

"OpenAI is an independent organization, and while Elon Musk has been involved with the organization in the past, he is not directly involved in its day-to-day operations or decision-making."

Dec 11, 2022
An excerpt from the link:
OpenAI is a non-profit research company founded in December 2015. The organization focuses on building safe artificial intelligence (AI) and is advised by several experts in the field, including physicist Stephen Hawking, computer scientist Alan Turing, and futurist Ray Kurzweil.

Alan Turing, Stephen Hawking? Very impressive! Surely this is a parody. Perhaps generated by ChatGPT?
 
for those who believe TA is no good:
nasdaq composite is on verge of breaking/just almost broke on heavy volume 14 month long trendline
is the bear market over? probably so
as far as TSLA, we are likely headed much higher over next several months to years
wild guess, and don't hold me to it, could be as high as $1000+ by january 2025
which would be 10X from bottom $101 or so
this view is entirely based on TA, and since we all know for sure TA is no good, this is just purely speculative opinion with zero chance of TSLA doing 10X in less than 2 years
so, back to regular programming
 
for those who believe TA is no good:
nasdaq composite is on verge of breaking/just almost broke on heavy volume 14 month long trendline
is the bear market over? probably so
as far as TSLA, we are likely headed much higher over next several months to years
wild guess, and don't hold me to it, could be as high as $1000+ by january 2025
which would be 10X from bottom $101 or so
this view is entirely based on TA, and since we all know for sure TA is no good, this is just purely speculative opinion with zero chance of TSLA doing 10X in less than 2 years
so, back to regular programming

I think we knew that without the charts, but good to have confirmation.

I’ve had the flaming bear avatar for most of this week. Seems pretty clear as oversold as we are that anyone short is still short is gonna be in a world of hurt soon.

Likewise, I don’t need TA to tell me Tesla is oversold. 4 weeks of listening to people whine non-stop about Musk’s Twitter, broken promises how 4Q numbers aren’t “Epic” (even though it hasn’t been released yet), plus a million other little bits of whining…. That was a good sign that were were at a bottom.

So… thanks for the confirmation I guess?

1674541260679.png


PS: Not a complaint. Thanks for a good post!
 
Last edited:
Well…. Snap I thought those were getting built in Texas eventually. I guess the expansion in Texas is for ?? Gen 3?
At Texas the south end extension is apparently offices, and end-of-line,

I think some offices are probably going relocate to free up space in the existing building.

The cathode building is for cathodes, and the single storey high building near it probably not for vehicle production.

I think they will probably build at least one Gen3 vehicle at Austin, but that is probably a later phase of construction.

I'm still inclined to believe the rumours about Mexico.
 
Well…. Snap I thought those were getting built in Texas eventually. I guess the expansion in Texas is for ?? Gen 3?

Well, lets's do some quick math: 50K Semi's per year w. 915KWh each needs about 45 GWh of battery cells. That's about the current output of Giga Nevada. Check.

I think this implies that Tesla will transition all Models 3/Y over to 4680 structural packs (perhaps beginning with Project "Highland"), and only the Semi will continue to use the 2170 cells (which fleet operators aren't concerned about).

To me, this is a major new piece of information going forward. It'll be great to simplify 3/Y production and logistics with a single architecture for both versions of the structural pack (LFP for SR's and NMC for LR's).

Not only that, but Berlin's supply of 2170s could be reallocated to a EuroSemi at some point, as could LG 2170s used in Shanghai be reallocated to a MiC Semi.

Sweet!
 
Well, lets's do some quick math: 50K Semi's per year w. 915KWh each needs about 45 GWh of battery cells. That's about the current output of Giga Nevada. Check.

I think this implies that Tesla will transition all Models 3/Y over to 4680 structural packs (perhaps beginning with Project "Highland"), and only the Semi will continue to use the 2170 cells (which fleet operators aren't concerned about).

To me, this is a major new piece of information going forward. It'll be great to simplify 3/Y production and logistics with a single architecture for both versions of the structural pack (LFP for SR's and NMC for LR's).

Not only that, but Berlin's supply of 2170s could be reallocated to a EuroSemi at some point, as could LG 2170s used in Shanghai be reallocated to a MiC Semi.

Sweet!
Makes sense. At least the part about the semi sucking up all of the 2170 production anyhow.

Converting all Model 3/Y to 4680 I thought was in the plans regardless, just going to be interesting seeing what happens with sourcing them.

Seriously doubt they are thinking about shuttering the Fremont facility any time soon and the 4680 production in Fremont seems way too small for all Model 3/ Y production there to convert. Another possibility is a big battery expansion in Fremont... where? Manufacture packs in Texas and ship them to Fremont?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eugene Ash
Seriously doubt they are thinking about shuttering the Fremont facility any time soon and the 4680 production in Fremont seems way too small for all Model 3/ Y production there to convert. Another possibility is a big battery expansion in Fremont...

Agreed. But much remains to be settled with sourcing of LFP packs (more in March).

Tesla Ramps Up Battery Production in Fremont by Expanding into New Building | Tesmanian (Dec 21, 2022)

 
Agreed. But much remains to be settled with sourcing of LFP packs (more in March).

Tesla Ramps Up Battery Production in Fremont by Expanding into New Building | Tesmanian (Dec 21, 2022)

You can't build a battery cell factory for $1.5 million. It doesn't look like we know what the building will be used for. And you didn't say we do, but the article seems to be presumptuous.
 
Nice timing. The Brussels auto show starts tomorrow, and that is typically a big sales booster for the car sales in Belgium. I think the traditional car manufacturers are now frantically reworking their discount spreadsheets. Inflation reduction!

A follow-up on the above post, with a very interesting retrospective of De Tijd on the Brussels car show: https://www.tijd.be/ondernemen/auto...n-concurrentie-in-het-defensief/10442239.html

I’ll try to translate some of the more interesting observations:
- No big discounts from the competition on the car show, because their EV production is fully booked, for some models for over a year. E.G. Audi offered a discount of 500 euro on the Q4 etron, a car that starts at 57K.
- Teslas are now much cheaper that the corresponding models from the competition: Model Y is 10K cheaper than the Q4 etron, Model 3 is 10K cheaper than the BMW i4
- Tesla’s pricing change causes commotion with the lease companies, mainly active in the company car market and 90% of the Tesla’s sold are company cars.
- The price change causes Teslas now to fit in many company car budgets, just at the time that the Belgian car market is greening fast (see my previous posts about a tax change in the middle of this year that makes it very financially unwise to buy a new ICE company car). Teslas are now cheaper to lease than the competition, and the delivery times are much shorter. More than a year wait time for the Q4 etron, and the popular Ioniq 5 can’t be ordered because the wait times got too high.
- The competitors hope that Teslas price changes are temporary, and they get more nervous by the day
- According to KBC autolease, this creates a lose-lose situation for the competion: they can’t increase production, and they can’t drop prices because their margins are too low.
 
A follow-up on the above post, with a very interesting retrospective of De Tijd on the Brussels car show: https://www.tijd.be/ondernemen/auto...n-concurrentie-in-het-defensief/10442239.html

I’ll try to translate some of the more interesting observations:
- No big discounts from the competition on the car show, because their EV production is fully booked, for some models for over a year. E.G. Audi offered a discount of 500 euro on the Q4 etron, a car that starts at 57K.
- Teslas are now much cheaper that the corresponding models from the competition: Model Y is 10K cheaper than the Q4 etron, Model 3 is 10K cheaper than the BMW i4
- Tesla’s pricing change causes commotion with the lease companies, mainly active in the company car market and 90% of the Tesla’s sold are company cars.
- The price change causes Teslas now to fit in many company car budgets, just at the time that the Belgian car market is greening fast (see my previous posts about a tax change in the middle of this year that makes it very financially unwise to buy a new ICE company car). Teslas are now cheaper to lease than the competition, and the delivery times are much shorter. More than a year wait time for the S4 etron, and the popular Ioniq 5 can’t be ordered because the wait times got too high.
- The competitors hope that Teslas price changes are temporary, and they get more nervous by the day
- According to KBC autolease, this creates a lose-lose situation for the competion: they can’t increase production, and they can’t drop prices because their margins are too low.
Journalism about Tesla in Belgium: A lot of Model 3 and Model Y cars are made in Berlin.

Quotes from specialists are beter than what their own journalists are writing.
The conclusions are crystal clear. If legacy lowers prices, they are dead. If they do nothing, they are dead as well 🤣
 
You can't build a battery cell factory for $1.5 million. It doesn't look like we know what the building will be used for. And you didn't say we do, but the article seems to be presumptuous.

Agreed, $1.5 million could be just for the shell of a new build (permits should tell us more). Battery production equipment would be the bulk of the capital expense, but it's the supply chain that's of interest. Where will all the raw materials be sourced?

If Fremont switches to 4680s for cylindrical cell packs they'd need ~20GWh/yr capacity (with perhaps another 30GWh/yr in LFP packs). That's about double the initially announced intention for Kato Rd capacity (which was 10GWh/yr). As usual, more questions... more questions... ;)

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
In order to maintain a consistent experience, Tesla will allow other BEVs to use Superchargers with a randomly generated 50% failure rate.
  1. Bums in seats sell Tesla cars.
  2. Reliable Supercharging fights FUD and sells Tesla as being well run & having efficient Tesla Supercharging network - being grateful that your own non-Tesla EV charges successfully and also watching Teslas charge fast & depart quickly, talking with Tesla users. This indirectly sells Tesla cars.
  3. Tesla cars and good perceptions of Tesla Supercharging sell TSLA stocks (it seems from recent report of retail buying, but also to institutions).

In Europe, there are more non-Tesla EVs than in North America (% of all cars, % of EVs, need for charging on same charger as Tesla use - CCS2). Tesla have opened up parts of their charging networks in several countries which border each other - so if you have a Kia, and you're driving across Europe, you might prefer to use Tesla Superchargers for reliability reasons especially on long or unfamiliar routes.

The reports on retail buying TSLA - did it split by country? In Europe, the demographic that buys Teslas (or has them for company cars) are likely to have the ability to invest pension or other investments themselves. Korean retail did buy a lot of shares. Who else? Familiarity with Tesla Superchargers might be having a positive effect in Europe.

Tesla set as preferred network. Kia EV6 LR RWD. Berlin to The Hague - others better placed to suggest good Tesla-dominated routes. Perhaps holiday routes to Spain, Italy, Croatia or Black Sea for summer or ski resorts (if it ever snows).

1674554764111.png
 
Last edited: