You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tesladaily will do it no doubt.If this is accurate/true......anyone willing and have the time to do the math to figure out Sept production? We have production numbers all the way up through Aug now, so we should be able to calculate at least somewhat close.
If this is accurate/true......anyone willing and have the time to do the math to figure out Sept production? We have production numbers all the way up through Aug now, so we should be able to calculate at least somewhat close.
Somebody already posted this video, but something about Mayur’s focus on ROIC and comparison of Tesla’s 23% to Apple’s 40% bothered me and I believe I figured it out.
ROIC on EXISTING (already deployed) capital (like Apple) is not that pertinent.
E.g. Assume another company (Apple Prime) has 2.5X more capital deployed than Apple but only has a 20% ROI vs Apple’s 40%, but is identical in every other way. Apple Prime should be more highly valued, because the cash flow would be greater.
Apple OBVIOUSLY cannot get a 40% ROI on NEW capital deployment, because if they could, they would immediately halt buybacks, dividends, deplete their bank account and borrow as much as possible to invest that new capital at a 40% rate of return
So ROEC (Return on existing capital) is just not important. Nobody cares about how much capital you had to deploy to get your present cash flows. Only the size of the cash flows and your present debt/cash balance matters.
So while Tesla has 23% ROEC, that’s not important. What IS important is their RONC (Return on New Capital).
Supposedly GF Shanghai Phase 1 only cost $1B. At 250k units per year and $10k gross profits / unit, that’s a staggering 250% gross profit return on that capital. I would imagine net cash flows from that factory would be a huge portion of that as OpEx shouldn’t be that high for that factory alone and/or China operations. Note: I believe GF Berlin and Austin are not that cheap, so I wouldn’t expect that RONC.
So RONC is one of the largest determinants on growth rate. And it is growth rate that is important! I believe Mayur mentioned legacy auto gets 10% RONC, but since new capital costs them 10%, they have no motivation to expand.
So ROEC is an historical measurement that is only important in so far as it helps predict RONC, which is EXTREMELY important as well as the total addressable market which helps decide how long a very high RONC can continue. In Tesla’s case, the addressable market for transport and energy is GIGANTIC, so they have a huge runway, which becomes infinite if they solve TeslaBot.
I believe my numbers are all CPCA reported but I have not double checked.If this is accurate/true......anyone willing and have the time to do the math to figure out Sept production? We have production numbers all the way up through Aug now, so we should be able to calculate at least somewhat close.
Indictments.I wonder from time to time, what would happen if we (TMCers) organized buy orders at critical resistance points?
Just thinking out loud…
Securement of Elons Capital? I was told the middle thing is always Elon ..We’d be investigated by the SEC
Never doubt GM investments. They are really good at spotting and investing in companies with great technologies and high growth potential like Lordstown Motors or Nikola Motors.Looks like GM is full in geo-based solution. First with Cruise geofence solution now investing in local solution for self-driving in China instead on importing Cruise solution. More variety only mean added complexity to a solution. What will they do? having Cruise on vehicles for US and Momenta on vehicles for China? What about Europe? Or dumping Cruise?GM Makes Self-Driving Bet In China To Catch Up With Nio, Xpeng
General Motors will invest in Chinese self-driving startup Momenta, as key new Nio, Xpeng EVs loom. GM stock rose.www.investors.com