Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Looks like GM is full in geo-based solution. First with Cruise geofence solution now investing in local solution for self-driving in China instead on importing Cruise solution. More variety only mean added complexity to a solution. What will they do? having Cruise on vehicles for US and Momenta on vehicles for China? What about Europe? Or dumping Cruise?
 
If this is accurate/true......anyone willing and have the time to do the math to figure out Sept production? We have production numbers all the way up through Aug now, so we should be able to calculate at least somewhat close.

Rob Maurer maintains a spreadsheet with China P&D data. I'm sure it'll be on his daily report soon.

@The Accountant may have the data as well.
 
Interesting anecdotal incident from the self-driving wars here in SF:

My wife, as a pedestrian waiting to cross, observed a GM Cruise vehicle make an unprotected left through a red light. There were screeching brakes as the perpendicular traffic had to avoid a crash. She said it looked like the driver took over emergently (but acknowledged it was possible the driver could have been driving the whole time and made the mistake him/herself).
 

Somebody already posted this video, but something about Mayur’s focus on ROIC and comparison of Tesla’s 23% to Apple’s 40% bothered me and I believe I figured it out.

ROIC on EXISTING (already deployed) capital (like Apple) is not that pertinent.

E.g. Assume another company (Apple Prime) has 2.5X more capital deployed than Apple but only has a 20% ROI vs Apple’s 40%, but is identical in every other way. Apple Prime should be more highly valued, because the cash flow would be greater.

Apple OBVIOUSLY cannot get a 40% ROI on NEW capital deployment, because if they could, they would immediately halt buybacks, dividends, deplete their bank account and borrow as much as possible to invest that new capital at a 40% rate of return:)

So ROEC (Return on existing capital) is just not important. Nobody cares about how much capital you had to deploy to get your present cash flows. Only the size of the cash flows and your present debt/cash balance matters.

So while Tesla has 23% ROEC, that’s not important. What IS important is their RONC (Return on New Capital).

Supposedly GF Shanghai Phase 1 only cost $1B. At 250k units per year and $10k gross profits / unit, that’s a staggering 250% gross profit return on that capital. I would imagine net cash flows from that factory would be a huge portion of that as OpEx shouldn’t be that high for that factory alone and/or China operations. Note: I believe GF Berlin and Austin are not that cheap, so I wouldn’t expect that RONC.

So RONC is one of the largest determinants on growth rate. And it is growth rate that is important! I believe Mayur mentioned legacy auto gets 10% RONC, but since new capital costs them 10%, they have no motivation to expand.

So ROEC is an historical measurement that is only important in so far as it helps predict RONC, which is EXTREMELY important as well as the total addressable market which helps decide how long a very high RONC can continue. In Tesla’s case, the addressable market for transport and energy is GIGANTIC, so they have a huge runway, which becomes infinite if they solve TeslaBot.

I don't think Mayur would disagree with most of what you wrote. He was only using return on existing capital as a way to project returns on future capital. Tesla's position is such that I do believe they will be able to increase their ROIC going forward, allowing for a pause in that increase due to the two more expensive and larger Gigafactories. That scale will take some time to maximize returns by ramping production over a multi-year period but the effect should be very positive on ROIC, maybe even astounding.
 
If this is accurate/true......anyone willing and have the time to do the math to figure out Sept production? We have production numbers all the way up through Aug now, so we should be able to calculate at least somewhat close.
I believe my numbers are all CPCA reported but I have not double checked.
I get 43,701 in Sep to reach 300k year-to-date. The 300k car is as of the 29th - so one more day until the 30th may get to 45k.

1632511388296.png
 
Man, I'm suddenly feeling better about buying a whole lot of stock (40k, a lot for me) at $717, $757, and thereabouts recently. I'm loving this spike!

Also, glad to hear that Elon thinks the chip shortage is temporary, and nice to see new chip factories coming up. Not sure if the Musk/Grimes separation will affect much but it sounds quite amicable. I guess it's good that they weren't married.

Last night I had a dream where Musk and I were talking at some kind of conference in front of a very large mural-sized window. Suddenly some fireballs were approaching as some transformers were blowing up in succession, rapidly approaching. He was going toward the glass and I said, 'Quick, under the desk!'. Next thing you know there are glass shards raining down all over the desk but we were unharmed.

Read into that as you will, lol. What does that say about me? Maybe don't answer in this thread.

Either way, glad to see the end-of-week spike after I sold my beloved P3D- to invest in MOAR TSLA! HODL THE DOOR!
 
Looks like GM is full in geo-based solution. First with Cruise geofence solution now investing in local solution for self-driving in China instead on importing Cruise solution. More variety only mean added complexity to a solution. What will they do? having Cruise on vehicles for US and Momenta on vehicles for China? What about Europe? Or dumping Cruise?
Never doubt GM investments. They are really good at spotting and investing in companies with great technologies and high growth potential like Lordstown Motors or Nikola Motors.