Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Maybe this will finally resolve the inconsitency that people report on valuation of FSD when trading a Tesla in on another Tesla:

Elon Musk@elonmusk
15m

Looking into this. No question that FSD should be viewed as reasonably valuable when doing a trade-in.

Since I know some people have gotten a fair value at trade-in, but others have reported that they were told that FSD had no value when trading in. (It should also help with the upgrade complaints.)
 
Last edited:
Elon is sandbagging more and more lately. I think the speed of the 4680 rollout is going to take a lot of people by surprise. View attachment 628535

He wasn't sandbagging Q4 deliveries. His email was pretty much exactly accurate assessment of the situation, as it's been in prior quarters.
He wasn't sandbagging FSD timelines.
He wasn't sandbagging Roadster, Cybertruck, Semi, or S/X refresh timelines.

What exactly has he sandbagged lately? 4680 production is honestly the only thing i can think of, and that's still just speculation on our part. It may very well be the case -- there's definitely some evidence there -- but if it is way ahead of schedule, then it'd be the first major thing he could be given credit for sandbagging.

Honestly, looking back at practically all of Elon's predictions and timelines, it's obvious that he's continuously giving his earnest best guesses -- neither sandbagging nor overpromising -- but he's not clairvoyant, and is sometimes a bit off. Predicting the future is *hard*, even for very smart people.

Betting on Tesla to be sandbagging numbers and timelines has been a losing bet 99 times out of 100, historically. Every one of us wants the company to pivot to a habit of under-promise and over-deliver, but don't fall prey to letting hope take root as belief. It's foolish to assume they are going to over-deliver something until they establish a consistent track record of doing so.
 
He wasn't sandbagging Q4 deliveries. His email was pretty much exactly accurate assessment of the situation, as it's been in prior quarters.
He wasn't sandbagging FSD timelines.
He wasn't sandbagging Roadster, Cybertruck, Semi, or S/X refresh timelines.

What exactly has he sandbagged lately? 4680 production is honestly the only thing i can think of, and that's still just speculation on our part. It may very well be the case -- there's definitely some evidence there -- but if it is way ahead of schedule, then it'd be the first major thing he could be given credit for sandbagging.

Honestly, looking back at practically all of Elon's predictions and timelines, it's obvious that he's continuously giving his earnest best guesses -- neither sandbagging nor overpromising -- but he's not clairvoyant, and is sometimes a bit off. Predicting the future is *hard*, even for very smart people.

Betting on Tesla to be sandbagging numbers and timelines has been a losing bet 99 times out of 100, historically. Every one of us wants the company to pivot to a habit of under-promise and over-deliver, but don't fall prey to letting hope take root as belief. It's foolish to assume they are going to over-deliver something until they establish a consistent track record of doing so.
-Model Y timeline was sandbagged.
-2020 delivery estimates were sandbagged if you consider they were made before we knew covid was a thing
 
-Model Y timeline was sandbagged.
-2020 delivery estimates were sandbagged if you consider they were made before we knew covid was a thing

i think you can only give partial credit on 2020 delivery numbers. they predicted a *lower bound* of 500k, and then delivered 499k. Yes, COVID, but also they had ample opportunity to adjust that guidance throughout the year, and chose to re-iterate it instead multiple times. that's not sandbagging.
 
He wasn't sandbagging Q4 deliveries. His email was pretty much exactly accurate assessment of the situation, as it's been in prior quarters.
He wasn't sandbagging FSD timelines.
He wasn't sandbagging Roadster, Cybertruck, Semi, or S/X refresh timelines.

What exactly has he sandbagged lately? 4680 production is honestly the only thing i can think of, and that's still just speculation on our part. It may very well be the case -- there's definitely some evidence there -- but if it is way ahead of schedule, then it'd be the first major thing he could be given credit for sandbagging.

Honestly, looking back at practically all of Elon's predictions and timelines, it's obvious that he's continuously giving his earnest best guesses -- neither sandbagging nor overpromising -- but he's not clairvoyant, and is sometimes a bit off. Predicting the future is *hard*, even for very smart people.

Betting on Tesla to be sandbagging numbers and timelines has been a losing bet 99 times out of 100, historically. Every one of us wants the company to pivot to a habit of under-promise and over-deliver, but don't fall prey to letting hope take root as belief. It's foolish to assume they are going to over-deliver something until they establish a consistent track record of doing so.
Elon confirmed on the Plaid S (and possible 4680) sandbagging via from this tweet reply.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1345386356504027136?s=21
 
So for those anticipating 4680 in the refreshed S/X... I was in that camp as well, but the recent Panasonic CES interview makes me doubt that. This is Celina Mikoljaczak on the 4680s. She is a former Tesla battery scientist currently VP of Panasonic NA, working in Giga Nevada, leading the Pana team:

"We are studying it from all aspects. There are some fundamental design issues with that sell, there are manufacturing issues with that cell. Some of the manufacturing gets a lot more challenging for that kind of a cell.... The sell is going to have a number of merits, there is going to be some demerits to it as well."

It does not feel like it is ready for prime time just yet. Maybe for Plaid/Roadster which have a huge margin and can carry something with a low yield. However that would require a pack/structural pack that can take both 2170(L) and 4680 for standard S and Plaid S respectively. Not impossible, but questionable engineering overhead.
 
Maybe this will finally resolve the inconsitency that people report on valuation of FSD when trading a Tesla in on another Tesla:



Since I know some people have gotten a fair value at trade-in, but others have reported that they were told that FSD had no value when trading in. (It should also help with the upgrade complaints.)
Tesla don't need to value it because there isn't much competition when you come to trade in. Tesla will eventually value FSD at trade in because your neighbour will be offering you $80k for your 3 yr old M3 SR. It will be worth even more to Tesla.
 
Easy software fix for the sleeping cat problem: When the parked Tesla senses a driver getting in, the external speaker plays this sound:


Make it an option called Cat Mode.

The claim that Tesla killed a cat because it was quiet is ridiculous.

A cat can hear and sense the car starting even if it is sleeping.

The problem is that the cat sees the most enclosed space is being the most
What's really scary is that she has little kids.


The claim that Tesla killed a cat because it was too quiet is absurd.

A cat can sense the car starting as soon as it happens. It is in their nature; built in high quality detectors. No car is too quiet for a cat, not yet anyway.

The problem is that when a cat senses a danger, it immediately chooses the most enclosed space in its environment. If it is under the car at the time then it goes to the front or the back of the tires most of the time because of additional sense of safety there, having its back to something solid.

And ICE cars are more dangerous to cats than EVs. ICE cars can also kill cats that happen to hop into the engine bay.
 
Very please with the progress.
I was losing faith that Tesla could deliver FSD, but the latest update gives me some hope back.

Also consider that Tesla is making major improvements with very limited data, just a handful of beta testers. Wait till the broad beta release comes out plus Dojo goes live! It will be accelerating returns, instead of diminishing returns, at least in the short-term.
 
2. Based on the battery manufacturing clips that Tesla has released, methinks the 4680 process is further along than Tesla is letting on. It may not have all pieces of the new battery puzzle yet (like dry electrode), but IMO this lends more credence to the belief that the S refresh will have 4680s.

They're clearly making some cells as shown in the video, however we have no idea of the yield rate. If only (e.g. 10%) are passing QC then there may be a long way to go.

The problem with DBE as opposed to Tesla's other cell innovations is that the alternative to using that feature required giant expensive drying ovens - Kato road couldn't function without DBE given the size of the building and DBE therefore needs to be improved to the point where yields are high enough to produce 4680 cells at volume before Tesla cells can be put in products. Other innovations like anode/cathode chemistry could be swapped out without too much trouble.

That said - Tesla may be able to get 4680s without DBE from Pana/LG or another supplier until in-house cells are up to scratch. So Kato road is not necessarily a blocker to refreshed S/X using a structural 4680 pack - It may just not be using roadrunner cells.