Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
No, @FrankSG has plenty of other good dreams. See his .sigAll your good dreams are based on one single thing - the FSD becomes a reality, which may or may not be true in 10 years.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, @FrankSG has plenty of other good dreams. See his .sigAll your good dreams are based on one single thing - the FSD becomes a reality, which may or may not be true in 10 years.
Right but they aren't going to give it away for 60k. And they shouldn't give one buyer a discount if the car is just for private use if they have a buyer who will pay to use it commercially.to get the money up front instead of over the lifetime of the car.
same reason it sells battery energy storage to power companies.
They will make a profit in both cases so in order to maximise their profit they will do both. Why wouldn't they?Right but they aren't going to give it away for 60k. And they shouldn't give one buyer a discount if the car is just for private use if they have a buyer who will pay to use it commercially.
so how many days until TSLA passes Toyota on this list? Whatever the time frame I underestimated how soon it would happen. I thought it would take longer.
View attachment 542919
They will make a profit in both cases so in order to maximise their profit they will do both. Why wouldn't they?
If they have enough commercial demand at far higher margins then they better not be giving away the same cars for lower prices.They will make a profit in both cases so in order to maximise their profit they will do both. Why wouldn't they?
"giving away"? Have you read the Mission Statement? Your $$$ won't help you when your house is under actual water.If they have enough commercial demand at far higher margins then they better not be giving away the same cars for lower prices.
I think the better approach is modest upfront cost and charge $$ on a per mile robotaxi basis. This way it is available at a reasonable cost to someone that wants it for personal use only. Use subscription or per mile fees for the investors/robotaxi operators to capture the value they are getting from FSD.
Just finished watching this. Wow!Tesla presentation on VPP and Autobidder - how it all works..
If they have enough commercial demand at far higher margins then they better not be giving away the same cars for lower prices.
So the only realistic way forward seems to be a combination of creating a robotaxi fleet and selling cars for personal use.
Just finished watching this. Wow!
Guess I understood like 90% of it, which is less than I did with Pete Bannon Autonomy Day.
My key takeaways is that Tesla are really good at software. I worked a little bit with firmware development and network protocols before and Tesla are doing it like pros, unlike my experience in the industry. Both speakers are brilliant, Tesla sure can attract the best players and no doubt Tesla will be the winning team in this game. Software seems production ready while still being pretty close to an optimal solution and easy to upgrade. It should work great with solar and power walls and is ready to add V2G with the million mile battery.
Again Tesla gives the correct answers, but even with the answers the competition will struggle to even reimplement what Tesla did in the software for many years and the competition is way less vertically integrated in the hardware stack. It’s not even close...
I think many of us have failed to grasp just how far ahead in the VPP race Tesla is. Expect the battery day to make this more clear for the industry.
Yes, we fully agree. I was not intending to exclude that, perhaps I should have phrased the original post better.Selling cars does not mean they can not be used as robotaxis. Individuals, fleet operators, and/or other random investors can buy Tesla vehicles to generate an income for them as a robotaxi.
My key takeaways is that Tesla are really good at software.
So the only realistic way forward seems to be a combination of creating a robotaxi fleet and selling cars for personal use. In fact Tesla already plan to use their model 3 lease cars to build the Tesla owned robotaxi fleet. This should cut the capital cost (and hence cash requirement) by around 50%. However whilst this is ramping it makes sense to leverage existing privately owned Teslas to supplement the Tesla owned robotaxi fleet, sharing the profits with the owners in some manner.
I do not remember any discussion of potential battery suppliers for GF Berlin. Has anyone else seen anything on this? I am not aware of existing suppliers in Europe that would be capable of meeting the volume that would be required. Perhaps the plan is that Tesla will manufacture all cells itself at GF Berlin. Maybe this will be covered in Battery Day. I am hoping that this is the case and the Model Ys produced in Berlin will have the rumoured tabless million mile cells.
Why put together an animated report? Seems childish.