I would love to know the answer to that. That is the gift that keeps on giving, so understanding the 2019 magnitude/spread might give some insight into future years.We don't know yet.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would love to know the answer to that. That is the gift that keeps on giving, so understanding the 2019 magnitude/spread might give some insight into future years.We don't know yet.
I actually have some footage at night in torrential rain when even human traffic slowed down to like 40mph where they normally go 80. I've just been to lazy to process it. Perhaps one of those days.
AP was not engaging for some time, but once it did - it did a good enoug hjob of staying in lane and mostly not doing anything stupid (once tried to dive for an exit, otherwise mostly unremarkable).
He might have been talking about the old asynchronous kind.Metastability issues in synchonous SRAM? I thought the delays were needed due to address decode/ propagation.
Tesla Registration Stats
If Norway is any guide, it took about 8 -10 days to deliver the vehicles in transit at the end of Q1. More concerning is that, with only one week left in April of the 749 cars registered this month, only 75 are Model S &X (combined). That compares with 720 registered in April 2018. It's hard to draw any conclusions as to Model 3 demand in light of the cut-of in shipments, but that can't explain the abysmal S&X sales. I'll be very interested to see if they beak out margins by model in the ER. If there are deep discounts being offered on S&X, that will just make matters worse.
(Please don't) Fire Away
Well, I guess they're sort of doctors. But not like doctors who see patients. I've never met a radiologist for a doctor's appointment, have you?
OT!I'm not up for trying to dig up a citation, but if memory serves what I'm talking about was using the then-popular term, "expert system" which was better at ranking diagnoses. Years (decades? I lose track) ago this was done, but the medical profession is a bit too... defensive... to accept the use of diagnostic aids.
Well, I'm not that close to health care anymore, but to caveat I wouldn't be surprised if this hasn't filtered up in some fashion that is less direct than the doctor-omniscience threatening computer diagnosis simply because of how long ago what I'm talking about referred to. But I have had doctors who plainly just googled the symptoms. Oh, I'm sorry, looked it up on webmd. Sigh. (how do I know, because they said. And I wondered what I was paying them for...)
In other words, this is exactly the right approach. Funny how it parallels driver assistance
(OK, "some math/CS background" may be an understatement. I only have a bachelor's degree in math, but both my parents are math professors and I've studied all kinds of random math and CS stuff extracurricularly, so I actually have absorbed an awful lot of stuff from the "atmosphere" around me.)
Was about to say something similar. First point is robotaxis DO NOT need level 5 capabilities. I'd argue they don't even need level 4 (no human backup, but limited operational environment).As a generalist, you need to have a couple simple questions in mind: if I summon a car to get me places, and there's a car in the fleet nearby, will it be able to get to me? Will it take me where I need to go? My vacuum cleaner kicks off at 1pm every day. It got a lot of space to deal with, pretty complicated too. Yeah it gets stuck here and there, so maybe twice a month I have to pull it from somewhere and take it to its charging base. Would I go back to hiring someone to clean the place just because it fails ~7% of the time? Hell no, this is good enough and I'm sure in the 3 years since I got this vac, they came up with something that would only fail 1% of the time, once a quarter maybe. Same here, as long as these FSD cars aren't presenting a safety hazard, even if they're not perfect the added safety and economic value is so overwhelming that dealing with a few glitches here and there is going to be well worth it.
They did, actually. Humans suck at changing lanes in traffic. They could have spent enormous amounts of time developing traditional imperative software to make lane changes. Instead they are training a predictor that takes in gobs of real-life lane change examples, successful and not, and once trained will be capable of reliably calling a lane change to the "driving policy" layer as you call it to execute on it. You can also set the confidence level from the predictive layer with which you want the policy layer to act on a lane change.
Ah, that would make sense.He might have been talking about the old asynchronous kind.
I saw a tweet that pegged it at 10 minutes and another at 15, so guessing not. (Or traffic sucks there)Also did all the FSD demos go the same route?
One of Gerbers tweets made me feel like that.
So are you gonna take the job Elon offered you?!
But you don't need to maintain that stopping distance for side roads you aren't taking, correct?Less than 20 meters of the side roads were visible.
Ah, that would make sense.
At least it wasn't magnetic core memory.
Or phosphor...
Or punch cards...
Or reel to reel...
I saw a tweet that pegged it at 10 minutes and another at 15, so guessing not. (Or traffic sucks there)