ElectricIAC
Good-Natured Rascal
In this instance.Define affluent.
Anyone who doesn’t need daddy.gov’s help buying a Tesla.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In this instance.Define affluent.
The affluent do not need help buying EV’s.
I did and I have even when I had my pick of any BMW or Audi lease at half the price available to the general public.Even if true, the relevant question is whether they would buy EV without the EV credit. If the Tesla price reductions that occurred subsequent to their loss of the EV tax credit is anything to go by, the answer is mostly no.
What’s to say someone making 500k a year needs daddy govs help?In this instance.
Anyone who doesn’t need daddy.gov’s help buying a Tesla.
I did and I have.
If you’re living hand to mouth on over 200K, you might have a checkbook balancing problem.What’s to say someone making 500k a year needs daddy govs help?
Or even 250k?
So what are you arguing for.If you’re living hand to mouth on over 200K, you might have a checkbook balancing problem.
Get high emissions clunkers off the road in exchange for EV’sSo what are you arguing for.
OK ...Get high emissions clunkers off the road in exchange for EV’s
So we are arguing for the same objective. I’m pointing out that either the income cap should lowered and a larger subsidy given if we are trying to help people “afford” an EV. If we broadly want to increase adoption and incentivize people, let’s let everyone at any income get it.Get high emissions clunkers off the road in exchange for EV’s
I’d just rather see the money put where it’s needed most. If that means a family of modest means gets 15K toward a Model Y, ID4 or Q4 etron then so be it.So we are arguing for the same objective. I’m pointing out that either the income cap should lowered and a larger subsidy given if we are trying to help people “afford” an EV. If we broadly want to increase adoption and incentivize people, let’s let everyone at any income get it.
As it is written now, a household making 500k is eligible for the rebate. I’m arguing that for that person, and for most people the question is more about how we prioritize our money instead of an affordability calculation.
I’d just rather see the money put where it’s needed most. If that means a family of modest means gets 15K toward a Model Y, ID4 or Q4 etron then so be it.
So again, what is the exact cutoff for modest means? How do we judge who needs money to afford an EV?I’d just rather see the money put where it’s needed most. If that means a family of modest means gets 15K toward a Model Y, ID4 or Q4 etron then so be it.
Model 3's come from the US for most of Europe still I believe. Maybe that's changing. I think Y's for now have been coming from China.
Maybe I didn't read all the fine print, but I wasn't aware of the 90 day limit. I just called and asked and took what they gave me. I guess I don't feel like I am "saving" thousands of dollars just because they raised the price. I was trying to time my order with the legislation the whole time. Still don't get the animosity.Tesla has made it clear in the writing that you can only put a technical hold for 90 days or one delivery period.
People are just angry because Tesla hasn't enforced it til now. It causes a huge headache every quarter for those who do logistics and matching. I love how angry people pretend they'll be. Everyone has taken advantage of it, and is now angry over losing $250 and the 8-10K they could've saved just taking delivery. This is on the customer not Tesla. Have fun at a dealership!
I’d almost prefer to see this but still like the idea of post deduction income caps.Price limits on the cars are far more important than income limits. In most other countries that offer EV subsidies, the offers end as soon as the price crosses a threshold of around $40K. This prevents manufacturers from simply padding their $40K car prices up to $48K and eating the entire subsidy that was intended to help consumers and not raise profit margins.
I can certainly appreciate there will be differences between $100/150/200K HHI in Omaha and San Francisco which is why it should be post-deduction and adjusted based on place of residence reference COL.So again, what is the exact cutoff for modest means? How do we judge who needs money to afford an EV?
More than your income for a set year, I would argue that your ability to afford something is more a culmination of how much financial discipline your exercised over the years. One family making 60k a year over 10 years vs another could be in vastly different financial positions to “afford” a 65k car at the end of 10 years.
Also this doesn’t factor in cost of living in certain urban areas. I think there are too many variables, although in an ideal world we could just help those who truly need it. Fairest way and the way to have the greatest impact to transition to EV in my view is to make it fair across the board.