Knightshade
Well-Known Member
If they have enough testers then I’m fine with that.
I’m not fine with the lack of communication about it and continuing to participate in this asinine safety score program with nothing to show for it.
But if they were truly done and didn’t need more, this tweet below from 2 weeks ago makes little sense to say.
It makes perfect sense.
Testers in new areas (or meeting some other criteria not currently represented enough) would now only need a 95 score to be considered for addition.
That doesn't mean EVERYONE with a 95 or better gets in.
Twitter is...not great.....at communicating detail or nuance.... (and again neither is Tesla at large).
As an example of "some other criteria" BTW.... let's say (this is just a made up example not anything I know specifically is something they're trying to solve for) they find from existing feedback that especially steep 2-lane roads cause a specific issue they need more data to solve.
And they find that, say, one area in Colorado, another in Washington state, and another in, I dunno, Montana, happen to have a significant % of such roads.
Even though some people in those places might already be in the program, they might add some more specifically because they found a need that that area represents a good source of.... and combined with the tweet from Elon they might consider people there with scores as low as 95 when doing that.
They might even drill down as far as using zip code or something in a case like that example.