You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Turned it off before I ever pulled out of the parking spot when I took delivery. It was hilarious. The guy giving me my orientation (who was definitely not a Tesla car employee) brought up the screen with the steering, power and creep controls to explain it to me. Before he could get 5 words out of his mouth I had turned off Chill, switched my steering to sport, and turned off creep.
Higher stall impacts mileage and drive-ability
Great for better performance, not so great for most mass production cars.
With creep on, you can't fully stop without using the brake. With creep off, you can coast to a stop after regen finishes without touching the brake.
Same experience for me. I’ve tried it for an unreasonable stopping distance and still had to apply the brake. Although given long enough of course it would eventually stopNot in my S, 3 or X, all of which I have tested now, at least in a reasonable stopping distance. Will actually test on an empty road and let it take as long as it needs to see, but in practical use the speed, on my cars, when the brake needs to be applied is the same with roughly the same point of lifting from the accelerator, 4-6 MPH.
Not in my S, 3 or X, all of which I have tested now, at least in a reasonable stopping distance. Will actually test on an empty road and let it take as long as it needs to see, but in practical use the speed, on my cars, when the brake needs to be applied is the same with roughly the same point of lifting from the accelerator, 4-6 MPH.
how come it improved performance but impacts milage/driveability?.
Not sure of your confusion? That trade off happens in nearly every mod that improves performance- it reduces drive-ability or mileage. See also things like more aggressive cams or timing where you can run into idle issues but the car is faster... or higher engine compression where you make more power but need stouter more expensive parts and higher octane fuel... or a slew of other such tradeoffs between performance and reliability/streetability.
In the case of a torque converter, the higher the stall speed the higher the engine has to rev to get to stall speed or lock up. That's bad for mileage, and also for driveability and longevity as the transmission will be slipping at low rpms.
It can improve performance (if you get the right one) because it gets the engine into the powerband more quickly when you punch it... but it sucks for driving around in traffic at low throttle inputs.
A very high stall converter is a bit like doing a high rpm clutch dump on a manual... fun for a drag race but would be awful to daily drive that way.
Definitely on for me as I see no benefit at all to having it off. If you live in the city all you do is stop and go, so having creep is much easier to just let the car move up a bit when the person ahead of you moves up a few feet in slow moving traffic.
Slow moving traffic is the absolute best time ever to use TACC and/or EAP.
Why would you be using the pedals yourself like some kind of peasant?
Because I live downtown Toronto and last time I checked TACC and EAP don't: