Search results

Even more interesting is this one, about unbound proteins: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025

Check it, they used your chart in this meme, what are the chances?

I'm not seeing the logic for why they could count when it was politically expedient, but now they can't.

Remember that first bump for India was "A Humanitarian Crisis" https://theconversation.com/covid-19-in-india-an-unfolding-humanitarian-crisis-159654 But after they popularise ivermectin they suddenly can't count anymore. I look forward to reading your paper on that.

Good to see the WSJ is geting onboard. " Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution."...

Here's an interview with him so you can get some more context: On November 25th there occurred a singularly rare event in the ongoing COVID-19 saga – truth was spoken to power. A distinguished medical doctor and infectious disease expert was given free rein to interrogate a government official...

@DrGriz Want to throw some thought at this:

You guys have got to get out of these abusive relationships.

What is with you Yanks and making everything political? Can't it just be about the data. The data you guys struggle to bring.

And another thought experiment: Why is covid long over for those countries that didn't vaccinate?

That's patently not true. When presented with multiple data sets showing cause and effect of the vaccines, you set about trying to argue why they're not true. You've not shown that you can, or will think, one iota. Here's a thought experiment for you. Why do the vaccines work so well in...

But you're OK with using data that's statistically meaningless as if it bolsters your point? Here's a industrial hygiene perspective titled "Why Masks Do Not and Can Not Work": https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/1_Petty_New_Hampshire_Legislature_Presentation_January_27_2022.pdf...

It will turn out that he's a bit conservative. This experiment is going to have some sensational outcomes. The most obvious one is don't let criminal organisations do unsupervised trials.

Whoops, wasn't statistically significant, but the Centre for Data Corruption are too corrupt to notice. Then someone goes and expands the study: "Our study replicates a highly cited CDC study showing a negative association between school mask mandates and pediatric SARS-CoV-2 cases. We then...

Between the two of you, you can't work out what's poison and what's medicine.

Everything is an experiment. Always was. Always will be. The laws of physics don’t turn on and off just for experimentation. Feynman is not on your side. Here have 170 papers on the subject. https://brownstone.org/articles/studies-and-articles-on-mask-ineffectiveness-and-harms/

I don’t see anywhere where masks have worked. I guess we agree on that.

Deluded and inaccurate.

You could try listening to the message?

Fortunately the BMJ can fill in the gaps: "Our estimate shows that university COVID-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—for each hospitalisation averted we estimate approximately 18.5 SAEs and 1430–4626 disruptions of daily activities—that is not...

Actually, they're complicit. Elon's taking his time with the Fauxi files. You're gonna love em.

Well might have to Include NSW health, it's their data, but they're pretty f'ing stupid.

Did you like it how the third guy says that the vaccine increase infections? It's like you're the last person to find out about this.

And other Japanese guy And his friend: It's like they know something you dont. And it's like they dont want to be the last guy on the wrong side of this scam.

Probably should call them vaccine failures too, to be accurate.

Quick question, Why did Pfizer make special batches just for their own employees in Australia that weren't subject to testing?

I dunno, the Japanese guy seemed pretty upset.

Glad you asked. Everywhere is. but Japan is a cracker, and they were doing pretty well untill they stated vaccinating then three giant mask failures, with higher lows and higher highs.

Mask work? "If it disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is… If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s...

Lets ask Dr Fukushima: Dr. Fukushima declared that “the harm caused by vaccines is now a worldwide problem” and that “given the wide range of adverse events, billions of lives could ultimately be in danger.” Doesn't appear so. Also he appears to be quite upset.

Maybe they were looking for PACEMD's science?

You're confusing education with propaganda. If education had the effect you're claiming then more and more doctors would not be coming out calling to stop the shots.

Of course, as with currently, if patients were treated they faired much better. But what did we do, we changed our practices to withhold treatment. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/219457

Without evidence that americans were more susceptible, some might say it's iatrogenic. In fact some are.

The US is 16% of those deaths, wildly overrepresented. Why would anyone listen to the US official line?

How many data sets do you need to know you've got a sh1t sandwich? Here's number 4, 5 and 6: https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/open-access/increasing-sarscov2-cases-hospitalizations-and-deaths-among-the-vaccinated-populations-during-the-omicron-b11529-variant.pdf And Japan seems to be...

There was a possible way out, but we didn't try it, even when it could have been ready sooner: If we'd have come up with say 16 different RADVAC vaccines, and distributed them equally. Even if not perfect, as a bolster, and kept accurate records, in case of repeated failure, the diversity of...

Early treatment was the only way out.

Let's use the swiss cheese metaphor, but instead of the slices being of stuff that doesn't work, each slice can be a unique immune response. This gives a diversified immune response that can eradicate it from the population, like we did in Australia several times, and how it was a nothingburger...

It doesn't have to be good or bad, it only has to be imperfect. It was 95% claimed, that's what makes it shitty.

When you give everyone the same shitty immune response you create selective pressure for immune escape. Furthermore, once it's escaped you really struggle to put the genie back in the bottle. You end up with ever increasing deaths above normal, like what's shown in the chart.

There could be selective pressure towards immune evasion.

Sure looks like you've got it licked

ADE or immune dysfunction?

I don't know what offramp you see for this sh1tshow.

I can wait.

here: https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/posts/7293116/

The really cool use of that study is to show that the original pfizzer study was pfraud.

And ironic that I used it to show that it wasn't. If only all the data was open we wouldn't have anything to argue about.

If you take the 31% as the 40% who developed N-Abs, then 46.5% then didn't, that means that there's only 3.5% vaccinated and uninfected. With 80% vaccinated, and 2% seronegative, that should be 8%. Ergo, negative vaccine effectiveness. How good is math?