Looking at the map of southwestern NY does it seem to anyone else that a Supercharger in Corning would fill a big North/South and East/West hole?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would definitely vote for that. There is no good route from SE PA to the Finger Lakes region. I would only consider doing an ICE trip.Looking at the map of southwestern NY does it seem to anyone else that a Supercharger in Corning would fill a big North/South and East/West hole?
And I should add that we have heard rumors that the site acquisition team has been scouting Binghamton.
I vote for one in Erie, one at Hornell (or Bath/Hammondsport), and one in Binghamton. That would cover access on effectively all NY interstate highways besides I-90, which is already covered.
I never thought the "dot" placement on the coming soon SC map was meant to be that accurate, and just assumed it would be in Binghamton. That way people on 81, 88, and 86/17 could easily access it. Ithaca would be a bit out of the way for all of those routes.
I thought they were connecting destinations before building at destinations? Seemed a good strategy when I heard it...
What's your thinking on what makes the Hornell/Bath 17 triangle better than the Corning 15 triangle? That make striking distance to Buffalo? Corning make Erie a fail?
Where does it take you going south on 15?
While not ideal it also would service rt 81 while only adding about 30 miles to the section between Cortland and Whitney Point.I think whether Ithaca goes in or not is kinda irrelevant. Its a bridge to nowhere, a destination.