If I recall correctly Elon initially just wanted to demonstrate to the Automobile Industry (OEM) that electric cars can be equivalent or better than ICE cars and can be manufactured at similar costs. But the OEMs declined, except the ones in China. Now that the Chinese auto industry is becoming world dominant in electric vehicles there is no need for Tesla to continue on that mission. Elon has achieved that goal.
Although I wish Tesla would make the $25,000 car - but it looks like there are already plenty of Chinese alternatives available - except in the USA.
This is an important point. In the rapidly evolving vehicle markets globally it's obvious but not inevitable that Chinese companies will continue to be dominant in BEV's. In most markets where Tesla operates they're very much holding their competitiveness despite histrionics from those who see Chinese 'goblins' and those who watch second-by-second sales figures.
It is also true that Tesla innovations in Gigacasting, for example, were adopted only by Chinese companies. Similarly almost no non-Chinese OEM has devoted really serious devotion to complete transformation. Parts of VAG, notably Porsche, have done stellar progress. Part of Tata, most obviously Jaguar has done that as is now Land Rover. In India both Tata and Mahindra are doing that and even Stellantis is finally trying to adopt Chinese solutions. Further in urban mobility there is widespread adoption of clever and practical solutions nearly worldwide. So..
It's very easy to simplify all this. Factually, nearly all of that developed as a result of Tesla, thus advancing the Tesla vision. No problem, except, Tesla, quite clearly in Elon's view, has stagnated and become a trifle complacent. One thing we also should know about Elon Musk is that he never, ever has been complacent nor has he been able to tolerate complacency.
Here we have endless repetitious pages arguing over each specific tactic and frequently demonizing those who deign to disagree with a given post. Ridiculous!
Rather than endless and pointless petition we might actually try to understand what has happened. Tesla has succeeded in making BEV's a practical reality.
Now comes more disruption. Exactly how is the big unanswered question. Nobody really has answers, so we have returned to 2008 logically, with ideas and clear determination form Elon and many others. He and everyone in the Tesla leadership told us 2024 was the year of transition; and so it is!
Note: nothing at all was said or implied about share prices. Clues there have been in abundance. Clue: FSD implications are huge; humanoid robotics are huge; unknown implications of everything AI (in multiple permutations) are huge. Conventional automotive, Tesla-style is to remain huge; energy storage is and remains rapidly growing, as is TE-based energy management and delivery, including Superchargers..
Al of that is not simple nor is it simplistic. Elon may seem simplistic at times because he deeply focuses on a given topic to exclusion of all others, then moves on. People who fail to understand that take the individual statements of dominance in a given topic as a 'bet-the-company' play. It never is that, nor in fact has it been since Model S and Model 3, the only two genuine make-or-break moments.
2025 is the year when everyone will know whether all of this disarray will end out well. Not before!
[as usual, these are my opinions, largely stated as fact because i think them to be factual. I think but do not know these things]