Search results

Based on Musk's quote, I'm starting to question the man's intelligence. Why would he think it's important to retain human population parity for humankind to survive when experts believe (see The Five-Year Baby Ban) that we long ago reached the human carrying capacity of the earth and have far...

I think we agree in many ways. Certainly Musk should take care of the kids he has. But Musk did make a conscious decision at some point to have more kids than is healthy for the planet. Kotler is not breeding dogs. Musk could have adopted, which is what Kotler did with his dogs. I disagree...

The author having a lot of dogs as part of a dog shelter he and his wife apparently run in New Mexico (El Rancho de Chihuahua) has nothing to do with Elon Musk having more children per capita than is good for the planet. The dogs Kotler cares for have already been born. Kotler isn't breeding...

Two kids per family is a good policy because then human populations will decline, which is what we need to do since we have already far exceeded the carrying capacity of the planet according to most experts.

Overpopulation is THE top environmental proplem First, I'm not a SPAMbot. Second, there is no danger in clicking the link--or just copying it into one's browser. Also, it can be accessed from digg at The Anti-Environmentalism of Tesla Motors� Elon Musk Third, I reread the...

I was surprised by this article and not sure how I feel about the issue: http://www.ecohearth.com/eco-news/eco-op-ed/1055-the-anti-environmentalism-of-tesla-motors-elon-musk.html It claims that Elon Musk is anti-environmental and so by extension so is Tesla Motors.