Recent content by Singuy

Omar is exposing what everyone who understands all this knew from the beginning. Mercedes tried to make themselves look better when their autonomous program is 95% marketing and 5% substance. Now, if Mercedes were not so quick to certify as a L3 trying to market themselves as the leader when...

Exactly my point, people don't understand SAE levels. Everyone associates the levels with capabilities because no one actually read the SAE definitions beside us FSD nerds. Car manufacturers has a marketing department who fully understands this so they pushed Mercedes to...and according to their...

It'll still come a Tesla because about 8 people will actually buy a Mercedes and use their system. It takes months and a few hundred miles for people to trust a tesla even though the system is actually a good system. No one will engage the Mercedes system after the first disengagement going 500 ft.

The loophole comes from the garbage SAE that doesn't clearly define capabilities and yet assign them levels in which you can have extremely capable autonomous features as L2 and garbage capable systems as L3. The public doesn't understand this so mercedes having zero problem advertising their...

Mercedes purposely use definition loopholes in the SAE descriptions to market their cars' autonomous capabilities in a deceiving way because they lack actual USEFUL autonomous capabilities. You know this, so why are you defending such practices?

AP can lane keep and go straight no problem on city streets. CR compared AP vs Mercedes AP equivalent. I don't really care how FSD did (and I agree Omar used FSD to give Tesla the best possible light), but we know for a fact AP had zero problem on city street lane keeping a straight line unlike...

Exactly. If it can't do what AP can do then CR is publishing objective lies. This was the point of the video, exposing lies from the media.

Omar's intention is to review a system Consumer report stated that is rated higher than AP. All bets are off when it comes to how or where anything is used. If CR is telling their audience is better, well let's see what it's made of. Oh btw this test was not some crazy gauntlet involving blind...

Mercedes have been very clear that they have the "world first L3" car for sale. Yeah even this statement isn't true...lol.

Can we get this on video with multiple cars doing this at the same location? How reproduceable is this? When people talked about lane wiggle while getting into turning lanes...I have experienced this When people talked about "lane drift" on v11, I have experienced this However this not keeping...

Still haven't experienced this since v12 after 3k+ miles.

Humans are flawed. A robot will wait until there's zero chance of collision. A human will wait until there's an acceptable risk due to a lack of patience. Right now humans want the robot to take similar acceptable risk, then demonize it if something bad happens, but also want a crash free future.

What is not acceptable is this human behavior of anger and frustration. Do I feel it? Yes. Should I be feeling it given the amount of problem this incident created? Absolutely not, it's assanine to feel this much anger for something so inconsequential.

Plus it's not safety related. No one died from a car turning into an intersection too cautiously. If people find it annoying, then go kick dirt. It will literally delay their travels by seconds which will be made up by their rage speeding afterwards...actually it increases the chance of death...

Traffic manipulation is where it's at. Sitting in traffic doesn't have any value in complexity. Waymo sit in the right lane going slow mo and sits in traffic. It doesn't do blind UPLs across 4 lanes of traffic. Hell it doesn't do this maneuver where my car came out of the parking lot into 3 lane...