Recent content by MS-Alec

Installing it now

The title is serving as a legal document where ownership changes are recorded, isn't it?

Most likely "Tesla does not "care to know"" :(:rolleyes:

Several people who contacted me through this forum were able to get it back from Tesla, as well, as one person got reimbursed by 3rd party dealer (really lucky;)) .

Once again - Tesla conducted an audit in November , 3 days after the property (car) left their legal possession. Removed FSD a month later, in December. Case closed. Move on.

Please re-read the initial post. You have mixed the events and dates. The idea of Tesla is doing or can do something wrong is unacceptable for hard fanboys like yourself. I love how the car drives, every second of it. I'm pretty sure 90% of people on this forum can say - Love the car, hate the...

I am sorry, but I do not think it was ever said to me that FSD was loaded as a demo. Tesla said "You did not pay for it" without specifying any details. Removing anything after the sale happens (Tesla to 3rd party dealer) at least is unethical. I am not a lawyer but I think it is illegal. What...

Don, It was paid - by a previous owner and by me, as I paid for this specific feature by picking this specific car and paying more money! Yes, it was from 3rd party dealer, but does not matter at this point. Let assume for a minute, Don, that you go to Costo to buy a laptop and decided to get...

Totally agree! Tesla (as a company) will do whatever benefits them most at this moment - remove already paid and/or endlessly delay promised/prepaid features, resist fixing multiple quality issues, ignore customer's request fix faulty equipment (aka MCU memory and yellow screen issues), etc...

I'd make vroom to update the car and email pictures of updated screens with FSD.

You could but Tesla would not release any specific information to anybody but the owner or record (their record! )

The problem is - almost all auctioned cars sold AS-IS, therefore removing anything from them after the sale is unethical and probably illegal. Tesla could prevent the whole situation just doing that what you have said - throw those VINs into a list and disable all software features right before...

Unfortunately, it can change only if a precedent will be set as a individual law suit or class action law suit. :(:(:(

From a legal standpoint there's no a contract between the owner and Tesla, but there's one with Vroom, so Vroom is responsible for mispresentation of the car and make it a whole again. This is what I was told by lawyers.

Do you mind to share details? My Homelink is acting up, sending sometimes a double signal, causing the garage door stops right after its starting opening process. Tesla refuses to fix since it is intermittent.