Follow us on Twitter


Go Back   Tesla Motors Club Forum > General Forum > Technical

Technical Discussion about the Technical Side of Electric Cars

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 04-16-2009, 10:26 AM   #91
DDB
Senior Member
 
DDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 586
Sorry if this has been discussed, but I thought it was worth posting that,

"GM notes at next week’s meeting of the Society of Automotive Eng inners, there is actually a Task Force that will convene to continue its work in trying to make SAE J1772 the industry standard."

Does anyone know if this would impact Tesla, or whether Tesla has a position on this standard?

Plug Standard Needed For Electric Car-Charging Cord Interface: SAE J1772 | GM-VOLT : Chevy Volt Electric Car Site
__________________
Dave

'05 Passat powered by Biodiesel
'54 Corvette
DDB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 02:03 PM   #92
vfx
ERIC VFX
 
vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,648


Ah yes, 11+ years and counting...

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/p...ess012917.html
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.

Last edited by vfx; 04-16-2009 at 02:12 PM..
vfx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 02:28 PM   #93
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 593
If the proposed standard has been around for 11 years, why didn't Tesla adopt it? If there are competing proposed standards, why didn't Tesla select one of those?
Tdave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 02:42 PM   #94
vfx
ERIC VFX
 
vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,648
If you are interested in the J1772 connector, read this page:


J1772





Another Forum Thread.
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.

Last edited by vfx; 04-16-2009 at 02:52 PM..
vfx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 03:35 PM   #95
Super Moderator
 
graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Aptos, California
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesla Dave View Post
If the proposed standard has been around for 11 years, why didn't Tesla adopt it? If there are competing proposed standards, why didn't Tesla select one of those?
From vfx' link, it seems that the J1772 connector is presently only designed for low to medium power charging.

Quote:
This new Yazaki coupler will, however, be able to deliver much more than the former Level II power limit (6.6 kW), perhaps as much as 16-19 kW. This medium power capability is necessary in order to obtain reasonable charge times with upcoming long-range BEVs. Tesla Motors will be shipping their Roadster in 2008 with a 52 kWhr battery. With the former Level II charge limits of 6.6 kW, charge times for a 52 kWhr battery would become unreasonably long, perhaps as much as 7-8 hours. This charge time duration would extend beyond preferred late-evening low-cost Utility rate schedules, while a medium-power 3-4 hour charge could be scheduled to “fit” better into these upcoming schedules.

It is assumed that high power capable EVs (50+ kW) would now make use of a separate on-vehicle higher-power inlet standard that is yet to be developed. Overall, the attractiveness of all PHEVs and BEVs making use of an consistent, almost worldwide J1772-Yazaki-based low-to-medium power connection standard more than outweighs the loss of potential high power capability with the former Avcon connector. The need for and attractiveness of higher “fast charge” power capability for EVs is not yet proven to be necessary to market BEVs.
(emphasis mine)
graham is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 04:51 PM   #96
DDB
Senior Member
 
DDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham View Post
From vfx' link, it seems that the J1772 connector is presently only designed for low to medium power charging.



(emphasis mine)
Terrific explanation for us laymen. I don't much care to see a HD v. Blu-Ray battle especially when one would have to pay for a charging station of sorts...
__________________
Dave

'05 Passat powered by Biodiesel
'54 Corvette
DDB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 05:35 PM   #97
Head Moderator
 
doug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stanford, California
Posts: 3,606
Send a message via AIM to doug
The conspiracy theory I've heard is that established automakers have pushed for keeping the standard only capable of relatively low power in order to advantage plug-in hybrids over full EVs.
doug is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 07:22 PM   #98
vfx
ERIC VFX
 
vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by doug View Post
The conspiracy theory I've heard is that established automakers have pushed for keeping the standard only capable of relatively low power in order to advantage plug-in hybrids over full EVs.
Or that they have bollocks up the works so that no standard has been decided on in 13 years throwing (yet another) wrench into the new EV paradigm.
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
vfx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2009, 07:48 PM   #99
Senior Member
 
stopcrazypp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham View Post
From vfx' link, it seems that the J1772 connector is presently only designed for low to medium power charging.
(emphasis mine)
That's pretty disappointing, it's not even capable of the 4 hour charge in the Roadster, much less the 1 hour charge coming later. That means there is no incentive for Tesla to use this standardized connector.

I was hoping the standardized connector would be capable of high power charging so all it takes is a simple adapter for the 110V/220V and the connector can be used directly with an external charger for faster charges. Having two connectors will be a hassle, especially if the high power connector is likely to be standardized also sometime in the future.
__________________
Because there are tons of crazy people in this world...
stopcrazypp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2009, 08:32 AM   #100
TEG
Tesla Fan
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,975
Electric Vehicle Makers Agree on a Universal Standard Plug for Charging | Technomix | Fast Company
TEG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charging the Roadster malcolm Tesla Roadster 355 02-26-2010 12:20 PM
DIY Charging Networks malcolm Technical 2 05-28-2009 09:02 AM
SF public charging infrastructure TEG Off Topic 1 09-03-2007 10:41 AM
Charging time WarpedOne Tesla Roadster 18 08-19-2007 09:25 AM
What is the Tesla Roadsters charge time on a super charging station? dsacks6 Tesla Roadster 5 06-29-2007 03:57 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:27 AM.

Tesla accesories at EVComponents
Click here to learn about advertising!

| Home | Register | FAQ | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |
Teslamotorsclub.com (TMC) is in no way sponsored, endorsed, or affiliated by or with Tesla Motors, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries, suppliers, or vendors. ‘Tesla Motors’, 'Model S' and ‘Tesla Roadster’ are trademarks of Tesla Motors, Inc. Click here to learn about advertising!

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0