| Technical Discussion about the Technical Side of Electric Cars |  | |
04-16-2009, 02:03 PM
|
#92 | | ERIC VFX
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: CA Posts: 4,648 |
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
Last edited by vfx; 04-16-2009 at 02:12 PM..
|
| |
04-16-2009, 02:28 PM
|
#93 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Posts: 593 | If the proposed standard has been around for 11 years, why didn't Tesla adopt it? If there are competing proposed standards, why didn't Tesla select one of those? |
| |
04-16-2009, 02:42 PM
|
#94 | | ERIC VFX
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: CA Posts: 4,648 |
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
Last edited by vfx; 04-16-2009 at 02:52 PM..
|
| |  | |  |
04-16-2009, 03:35 PM
|
#95 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Aptos, California Posts: 1,551 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesla Dave If the proposed standard has been around for 11 years, why didn't Tesla adopt it? If there are competing proposed standards, why didn't Tesla select one of those? | From vfx' link, it seems that the J1772 connector is presently only designed for low to medium power charging. Quote:
This new Yazaki coupler will, however, be able to deliver much more than the former Level II power limit (6.6 kW), perhaps as much as 16-19 kW. This medium power capability is necessary in order to obtain reasonable charge times with upcoming long-range BEVs. Tesla Motors will be shipping their Roadster in 2008 with a 52 kWhr battery. With the former Level II charge limits of 6.6 kW, charge times for a 52 kWhr battery would become unreasonably long, perhaps as much as 7-8 hours. This charge time duration would extend beyond preferred late-evening low-cost Utility rate schedules, while a medium-power 3-4 hour charge could be scheduled to “fit” better into these upcoming schedules. It is assumed that high power capable EVs (50+ kW) would now make use of a separate on-vehicle higher-power inlet standard that is yet to be developed. Overall, the attractiveness of all PHEVs and BEVs making use of an consistent, almost worldwide J1772-Yazaki-based low-to-medium power connection standard more than outweighs the loss of potential high power capability with the former Avcon connector. The need for and attractiveness of higher “fast charge” power capability for EVs is not yet proven to be necessary to market BEVs.
| (emphasis mine) |
| |  |
04-16-2009, 04:51 PM
|
#96 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 586 | Quote:
Originally Posted by graham From vfx' link, it seems that the J1772 connector is presently only designed for low to medium power charging.
(emphasis mine) | Terrific explanation for us laymen. I don't much care to see a HD v. Blu-Ray battle especially when one would have to pay for a charging station of sorts...
__________________
Dave
'05 Passat powered by Biodiesel
'54 Corvette
|
| |
04-16-2009, 05:35 PM
|
#97 | | Head Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Stanford, California Posts: 3,606 | The conspiracy theory I've heard is that established automakers have pushed for keeping the standard only capable of relatively low power in order to advantage plug-in hybrids over full EVs. |
| |
04-16-2009, 07:22 PM
|
#98 | | ERIC VFX
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: CA Posts: 4,648 | Quote:
Originally Posted by doug The conspiracy theory I've heard is that established automakers have pushed for keeping the standard only capable of relatively low power in order to advantage plug-in hybrids over full EVs. | Or that they have bollocks up the works so that no standard has been decided on in 13 years throwing (yet another) wrench into the new EV paradigm.
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
|
| |
04-16-2009, 07:48 PM
|
#99 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 634 | Quote:
Originally Posted by graham From vfx' link, it seems that the J1772 connector is presently only designed for low to medium power charging.
(emphasis mine) | That's pretty disappointing, it's not even capable of the 4 hour charge in the Roadster, much less the 1 hour charge coming later. That means there is no incentive for Tesla to use this standardized connector.
I was hoping the standardized connector would be capable of high power charging so all it takes is a simple adapter for the 110V/220V and the connector can be used directly with an external charger for faster charges. Having two connectors will be a hassle, especially if the high power connector is likely to be standardized also sometime in the future.
__________________
Because there are tons of crazy people in this world...
|
| |
04-20-2009, 08:32 AM
|
#100 | | Tesla Fan
Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,975 | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:27 AM. | | | | | | | | | Click here to learn about advertising! | |