Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51

Thread: Model S Nominated for North American Car of the Year (2013)

  1. #31
    smoothoperator
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by stopcrazypp View Post
    To put it even more accurately, the Model S is a $40,000 car with a $20k battery pack and can be optioned up to $20k extra in batteries.

    The Fisker Karma is a $80k car with a $20k battery pack (for $100k base price). The Karma should be more luxurious given that price difference.
    This can be argued for ICE cars as well. an E350 has a 15k ICE, E550 20k ICE E63 40k ICE etc, yet the base model E350 has a more luxurious interior than the base model S....

    The problem here is not the 40KwH Model S , it is the top of the line Model S that lacks options and creature comforts that a 100k car should have regardless of what powers it. Tesla has a bigger margins on the high end Model S' it is all not battery costs...The margin is significantly more on the performance Model S
    Last edited by smoothoperator; 07-20-2012 at 03:04 PM.

  2. #32
    Roadster #1144 + Sig 114 dsm363's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,453
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothoperator View Post
    This can be argued for ICE cars as well. an E350 has a 15k ICE, E550 20k ICE E63 40k ICE etc
    Is that increased cost all the engine upgrade or do the more expensive cars have nicer interiors, more features....etc?

  3. #33
    smoothoperator
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by dsm363 View Post
    Is that increased cost all the engine upgrade or do the more expensive cars have nicer interiors, more features....etc?

    The higher end german sedans do have nicer interiors & more features. Look at the Mercedes AMG models, BMW M models etc

    But to begin with they had better interiors...why not make the Sig's a little bit more luxurious inside? Why do the one size fits all deal with these cars? I understand that Tesla is a small company and cannot do several trim models, but there has to be a little more differentiation in the interiors between the 57k model s and 107k model s.

  4. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Citizen-T View Post
    gliding you around in a Lazy Boy bolted to a cloud with a fridge full of champagne.
    What car is this? I want one.
    Truly Electric Spaceship-Like Adventure ~ Signature Model Spaceship

    PLEASE NOTE: these musings are the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, and are intended as part of a conversation among the Tesla Motors Clubs membership. My words may not be quoted by any third party outside the Tesla Motors Clubs forums, without my expressed consent. Especially the NYT, which is clearly ethically challenged.

  5. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothoperator View Post
    This can be argued for ICE cars as well. an E350 has a 15k ICE, E550 20k ICE E63 40k ICE etc, yet the base model E350 has a more luxurious interior than the base model S....

    The problem here is not the 40KwH Model S , it is the top of the line Model S that lacks options and creature comforts that a 100k car should have regardless of what powers it. Tesla has a bigger margins on the high end Model S' it is all not battery costs...The margin is significantly more on the performance Model S
    I doubt the 302 3.5L V6 in the E350 cost $15k, the 402hp 4.7L V8 in the E550 cost $20k, and the 518hp 6.3L V8 in the E63 cost $40k.
    You can buy a 412hp 5.0L V8 crate engine from Ford for $7.3k. A 550hp 5.4L supercharged V8 for $21k. Keep in mind that Ford makes a profit on these engines and are selling to the public at this price.
    http://www.fordracingparts.com/crateengine/main.asp#mod

    I'm separating the battery specifically because the electric motor alone is already roughly the same cost as an ICE. If you tried to source a 300kW induction motor (akin to buying a crate engine from Ford), it would cost you at least $20k, and that's assuming you get a group buy at high volume (100+). The threads below show companies are charging $34k for a 150kW motor and $50k for a 300kW. With a 100+ unit bulk buy you can get the price down to $11k for a complete 150kW ACP system (with the PEM).
    http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...0kw-22718.html
    http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...0-28400p2.html
    http://www.kleenspeed.com/ev-components/

    The battery is akin to a gas tank and a gas tank does not cost $20k-$40k.
    Last edited by stopcrazypp; 07-20-2012 at 08:26 PM.
    Because there are tons of crazy people in this world...

  6. #36
    smoothoperator
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by stopcrazypp View Post
    I doubt the 302 3.5L V6 in the E350 cost $15k, the 402hp 4.7L V8 in the E550 cost $20k, and the 518hp 6.3L V8 in the E63 cost $40k.
    You can buy a 412hp 5.0L V8 crate engine from Ford for $7.3k. A 550hp 5.4L supercharged V8 for $21k. Keep in mind that Ford makes a profit on these engines and are selling to the public at this price.
    http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...KeyField=11829

    I'm separating the battery specifically because the electric motor alone is already roughly the same cost as an ICE. If you tried to source a 300kW induction motor (akin to buying a crate engine from Ford), it would cost you at least $20k, and that's assuming you get a group buy at high volume (100+). The threads below show companies are charging $34k for a 150kW motor and $50k for a 300kW. With a 100+ unit bulk buy you can get the price down to $11k for a complete 150kW ACP system (with the PEM).
    http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...0kw-22718.html
    http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...0-28400p2.html
    http://www.kleenspeed.com/ev-components/

    The battery is akin to a gas tank and a gas tank does not cost $20k-$40k.
    Those motors do cost that much, I have had an engine replacement on an AMG wagon about 8 years ago and the warrantied cost was 40k (E55 AMG Handmade Motor)

    Domestic engines are a lot cheaper than European automotive engines.

    The biggest cost in the Model S is the battery not the Electric Motor. Tesla has used the analogy that if you do not plug in your vehicle when the battery has been depleted, that is akin to running your ICE with no oil. The relationship between an ICE powertrain & an EV powertrain is not as cut and dry as the way you have described it (i.e battery = gas tank). If this were true then Tesla would not be making the analogy between running out of oil and depleted batteries.

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by stopcrazypp View Post
    I doubt the 302 3.5L V6 in the E350 cost $15k, the 402hp 4.7L V8 in the E550 cost $20k, and the 518hp 6.3L V8 in the E63 cost $40k.
    You can buy a 412hp 5.0L V8 crate engine from Ford for $7.3k. A 550hp 5.4L supercharged V8 for $21k. Keep in mind that Ford makes a profit on these engines and are selling to the public at this price.
    http://www.fordracingparts.com/crateengine/main.asp#mod

    I'm separating the battery specifically because the electric motor alone is already roughly the same cost as an ICE. If you tried to source a 300kW induction motor (akin to buying a crate engine from Ford), it would cost you at least $20k, and that's assuming you get a group buy at high volume (100+). The threads below show companies are charging $34k for a 150kW motor and $50k for a 300kW. With a 100+ unit bulk buy you can get the price down to $11k for a complete 150kW ACP system (with the PEM).
    http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...0kw-22718.html
    http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...0-28400p2.html
    http://www.kleenspeed.com/ev-components/

    The battery is akin to a gas tank and a gas tank does not cost $20k-$40k.
    100 units is not high volume. 100,000 units is high volume.
    Ford manufactures the parts for their motors by the million. When EV motors are made by the hundreds of thousands the price will drop by an order of magnitude.

    The Ford motor is made in a factory that probably makes a half a million engines a year. You can't compare that to a handmade ICE or a handmade electric.
    Last edited by richkae; 07-20-2012 at 09:12 PM.

  8. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Antelope Valley, CA
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by richkae View Post
    100 units is not high volume. 100,000 units is high volume.
    Ford manufactures the parts for their motors by the million. When EV motors are made by the hundreds of thousands the price will drop by an order of magnitude.

    The Ford motor is made in a factory that probably makes a half a million engines a year. You can't compare that to a handmade ICE or a handmade electric.
    This is a very important point for EV's. Not simply the motor, but all of the parts that are low volume and are used to replace the ICE and supporting components. I's not just the battery cost but a hundred years of optimizing costs for the entire ICE process, systems and technologies.

  9. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothoperator View Post
    Those motors do cost that much, I have had an engine replacement on an AMG wagon about 8 years ago and the warrantied cost was 40k (E55 AMG Handmade Motor)

    Domestic engines are a lot cheaper than European automotive engines.
    I'm just pointing out the Ford engines because it can't cost Daimler that much more than for them make their engines (esp. for the lower end non-AMG models, which are definitely mass produced, they sold 340k E/CLS class last year).

    The biggest cost in the Model S is the battery not the Electric Motor. Tesla has used the analogy that if you do not plug in your vehicle when the battery has been depleted, that is akin to running your ICE with no oil. The relationship between an ICE powertrain & an EV powertrain is not as cut and dry as the way you have described it (i.e battery = gas tank). If this were true then Tesla would not be making the analogy between running out of oil and depleted batteries.
    I'm not saying the electric motor makes up the biggest cost of the Model S, I'm saying the battery does at $20-40k. But my main point in the second paragraph was that the electric motor alone will cost the same as an ICE!

    Plus I tried configuring the interior for the E350, E550, and E63 AMG. There were no differences in the interior between the models besides from the cloth/leather/AMG leather options and accent trim material options. So Tesla is not doing any thing different from Mercedes in that regard.

    Quote Originally Posted by richkae View Post
    100 units is not high volume. 100,000 units is high volume.
    Ford manufactures the parts for their motors by the million. When EV motors are made by the hundreds of thousands the price will drop by an order of magnitude.

    The Ford motor is made in a factory that probably makes a half a million engines a year. You can't compare that to a handmade ICE or a handmade electric.
    That's certainly true, but the point was EV motors (including Tesla's) are not made in the hundreds of thousands. So at this point they cost the same as (or more than) an ICE.
    Last edited by stopcrazypp; 07-21-2012 at 05:09 PM.
    Because there are tons of crazy people in this world...

  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by smoothoperator View Post
    The higher end german sedans do have nicer interiors & more features. Look at the Mercedes AMG models, BMW M models etc

    But to begin with they had better interiors...why not make the Sig's a little bit more luxurious inside? Why do the one size fits all deal with these cars? I understand that Tesla is a small company and cannot do several trim models, but there has to be a little more differentiation in the interiors between the 57k model s and 107k model s.
    While in principle I agree, the Model S put Tesla in a situation where Tesla had to release a quality, functional car on time that could be produced at up to 20,000 units per year. Those criteria were far and away the number 1 priorities. Tesla has meet those criteria (well, they're still working on ramping up production, but I have faith). I'm more than impressed with the job they've done so far. I'd cut them a little slack. I'm sure the Gen III car have all the less important things that the Model S missed out on.

    As Elon has said from the beginning, it takes three iterations to really figure out how to do something perfectly (just like in software). By the time they get to the mass market car (Gen III), it should be comparable or better in almost every way to a BMW, Audi or Lexus.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2013 NA Car of the Year Contenders
    By dpeilow in forum News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2012, 11:35 PM
  2. Model X - Elon Musk says new SUV model due in 2013
    By AnOutsider in forum Future Cars
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 09-23-2011, 05:53 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2011, 06:10 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-15-2009, 06:44 AM
  5. Tesla: The next great American car company?
    By TEG in forum Tesla Motors
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-09-2007, 05:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •