Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: If only the production Model S looked like this...

  1. #21
    ERIC VFX vfx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,827
    Quote Originally Posted by steve841 View Post
    IMO ... the biggest exterior disappointment is the Tesla emblem on the quarter panel that was lit up and three dimensional ... . that was very trick looking!
    Totally agree! At the X Event Franz hinted that is was dropped for aerodynamics.

    The world loves to be deceived.


  2. #22
    ERIC VFX vfx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,827
    A group of us talked with Franz last night at the LA opening in frot of a car about the nose changes. (so fun!)
    I don't want to misquote him but one thing he made very clear was the lower lip protrusion being a requirement (specifically he said Canada) that is a pedestrian safety device. Hitting the ankle first and causing the body to fall on the hood is requirement. No hitting an breaking the knee.

    He talked about how the air was originally going into the nose and for aero reasons they dropped it all down to low.

    The world loves to be deceived.


  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by vfx View Post
    the lower lip protrusion being a requirement (specifically he said Canada) that is a pedestrian safety device. Hitting the ankle first and causing the body to fall on the hood is requirement. No hitting an breaking the knee.
    Very interesting. I don't know if the Tesla blog is the proper forum, but this type of stuff would be great to make more public. For example, when going to car shows with "concept vehicles" it would be nice to have a more informed eye about "that feature won't make it to production because...."

  4. #24
    Model S - Sig. 283 EU
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Gelderland, The Netherlands
    Posts
    368
    I didn't like the concept, in the front view it looks too much like a boat. I do like how the Model S looks now, much more mature and powerful.

    (disclaimer: I currently drive a Karma)

  5. #25
    Roadster 919, S 2006 Doug_G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7,633
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by vfx View Post
    I don't want to misquote him but one thing he made very clear was the lower lip protrusion being a requirement (specifically he said Canada) that is a pedestrian safety device. Hitting the ankle first and causing the body to fall on the hood is requirement. No hitting an breaking the knee.
    Yeah, Canadian certification authorities often tend to be pickier than other countries.
    Roadster #919, Model S #2006
    Moderator: Tesla Motors , Electric Vehicles, EVents, Media
    , and Canada sub-forums.

    To the media: If you want to quote me, please contact me directly. I'll be happy to talk with you. Taking random postings out of context is not appreciated. Thanks!

  6. #26
    R#129, TSLA shareholder
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    1,080
    I was told the same thing by somebody at the factory back at the test ride event late last year (about the nose protrusion being for pedestrian safety).

    I don't mind the current look (although I preferred the original). What I do mind is some of the problems with body panel fit, especially around the trunk. Perhaps if somebody has a chance to talk to Franz, they could ask about that?
    R129 - 85kWh White/Tan

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeK View Post
    I was told the same thing by somebody at the factory back at the test ride event late last year (about the nose protrusion being for pedestrian safety).

    I don't mind the current look (although I preferred the original). What I do mind is some of the problems with body panel fit, especially around the trunk. Perhaps if somebody has a chance to talk to Franz, they could ask about that?
    Fairly sure it's a manufacturing issue to design

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Probability of new battery tech?
    By Johan in forum Battery Discussion
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 04-09-2013, 07:29 AM
  2. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-02-2012, 11:39 AM
  3. Production Model Version Poll
    By teslasguy in forum Model S
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-03-2012, 08:07 AM
  4. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 06-08-2012, 07:27 AM
  5. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-03-2011, 12:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •