View Poll Results: For Roadster owners without OVMS/Tattler, why not?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Privacy concerns

    2 8.70%
  • Warranty concerns

    2 8.70%
  • Initial cost

    0 0%
  • On-going cellular cost

    10 43.48%
  • Hassle dealing with another cellular SIM

    5 21.74%
  • Complexity

    2 8.70%
  • OVMS/Tattler, what's that?

    0 0%
  • I have no need for this

    5 21.74%
  • Other (please comment)

    5 21.74%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Why would you not want remote cellular monitoring/control

  1. #21
    Senior Member markwj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,287
    Quote Originally Posted by jory View Post
    ]i'll have to go back and read about the SIM card options/costs but i think this thread has catalyzed me into taking the OVMS plunge.
    To re-iterate: the purpose of my poll, and this thread, is not to "sell" OVMS/Tattler.

    I _really_ want to know why people would not want their car connected. So far from the responses here, the primary reason appears to be hassles and costs involved in the cellular plan. Next down is people don't have a need for it or are waiting for Tesla's solution (if any). Interestingly, privacy and warranty concerns are quite low down.

    Does anyone know how many roadster owners are active/lurkers on TMC? A few hundred?

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by markwj View Post
    ...Does anyone know how many roadster owners are active/lurkers on TMC? A few hundred?
    Maybe add a poll with the only vote being: "I own a Tesla Roadster.", or have the variants:
    1.5, 2.0, 2.0 Sport, 2.5, 2.5 Sport
    It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
    - Ferris Bueller about the 1961 Ferrari 250GT Spyder California
    - Me about the Tesla Roadster

    I live my life 240 [ideal] miles at a time.
    - Paraphrasing Dom in The Fast and the Furious

  3. #23
    Senior Member daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,123
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug_G View Post
    Almost every "dumb" phone I've seen in recent years can do texting. That's all you need.
    None of my friends or family use texting. So I have no need for a texting plan. But I was getting junk-advertising texts, and being charged 25 cents each for them, since I didn't have a plan. And though my phone can text, it has no keyboard. You press 2 three times to get the letter c. So I have texting blocked. I cannot send texts and I do not receive them.

    Quote Originally Posted by doug View Post
    Sounds like Daniel has a Jitterbug.
    Nope. Samsung Convoy. But as noted above, texting is blocked. Maybe the day will come when I unblock it. But for now I have no use for it.

  4. #24
    I think the primary purpose of the OVMS is to know the charging status of your car - if your charger can do that for you then it's a neat app to see if you left the doors unlocked, etc.
    I use chargepoint chargers (ChargePoint Network-Fueling the Electric Transportation Industry) which will email/text you if anything goes wrong with the charge and there's also an app to check your status. So yes the
    extra hassle of installation, getting a cell plan, etc. is a big barrier.


    Quote Originally Posted by markwj View Post
    To re-iterate: the purpose of my poll, and this thread, is not to "sell" OVMS/Tattler.

    I _really_ want to know why people would not want their car connected. So far from the responses here, the primary reason appears to be hassles and costs involved in the cellular plan. Next down is people don't have a need for it or are waiting for Tesla's solution (if any). Interestingly, privacy and warranty concerns are quite low down.

    Does anyone know how many roadster owners are active/lurkers on TMC? A few hundred?

  5. #25
    Senior Member daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,123
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by augkuo View Post
    I think the primary purpose of the OVMS is to know the charging status of your car...
    ... And my car only charges while I'm sleeping.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by jory View Post
    ...
    the recurring cost is a minor deterrent (one thing i like about the roadster is that while my initial cost was high, the recurring (fuel/electrons) cost is low!
    ...
    LOL (the cost of the OVMS hardware plus cellular is insignificant compared to tires and 12month/12,000mile service)
    It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
    - Ferris Bueller about the 1961 Ferrari 250GT Spyder California
    - Me about the Tesla Roadster

    I live my life 240 [ideal] miles at a time.
    - Paraphrasing Dom in The Fast and the Furious

  7. #27
    Head Moderator / Administrator doug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Stanford, California
    Posts
    9,067
    Blog Entries
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by daniel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by doug View Post
    Sounds like Daniel has a Jitterbug.
    Nope. Samsung Convoy. But as noted above, texting is blocked. Maybe the day will come when I unblock it. But for now I have no use for it.
    Heh... well Jitterbug was a joke. But thanks for the clarification.

  8. #28
    R #1211, SSL#282, XS#313 NigelM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    5,759
    Quote Originally Posted by augkuo View Post
    I think the primary purpose of the OVMS is to know the charging status of your car -
    I find it great to put the car in valet mode from my phone so I don't have to enter the pin number when the valet is standing right beside the car. Also it's a great security feature for tracking the car.

    Side note: I accidentally locked the car instead of putting it in valet mode last night at a restaurant. Locked the poor valet in the car, he was nervous 'cos he thought he'd done something wrong.....didn't tell him it was my fault.
    PLEASE NOTE: Posts are the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, and are intended as part of a conversation within this forum. My words may NOT be quoted outside this forum, without my expressed consent.

    Moderator: Model S, TSLA Investor Discussions, Florida and Off Topic forums

  9. #29
    Senior Member daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,123
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by NigelM View Post
    I find it great to put the car in valet mode from my phone so I don't have to enter the pin number when the valet is standing right beside the car.
    I do not go anywhere where I cannot park and lock my car myself. Even in the Prius.

    Humorous aside: In Mexico there is a common scam where someone appearing to be a valet offers to park your car. Gives you a ticket and everything. You never see your car again.

  10. #30
    P7971 - VIN:5130 - 3/2/13 jerry33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,916
    I didn't realize they even had valet parking anymore. I kind of remember some in the 1960s.
    Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demonstration.
    DISCLAIMER:
    1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
    2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
    3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Open Vehicle Monitoring System
    By markwj in forum Tesla Parts for Sale
    Replies: 574
    Last Post: 05-04-2013, 02:09 AM
  2. Tire pressure monitoring
    By Alan in forum Technical Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-06-2012, 07:18 PM
  3. Energy Monitoring Equipment
    By RayT in forum Energy, Environment, and Policy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-27-2012, 02:19 PM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-28-2012, 08:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •