Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 121

Thread: Is 4.4 seconds vs 5.6 seconds alone worth $10k?

  1. #61
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Atlanta Georgia
    Posts
    213
    My question about the performance S vs. Regular S has to do with comfort. I ma in my car all day. I don't know much about wheels. Would I get more comfort and a better ride out of the 21" or 19" wheels? Also, do the 19" inch wheels have a longer life. If someone could explain this to me my decision will be made. Thanks in advance

  2. #62
    XP268 de704's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug_G View Post
    Yeah, I'm fully expecting the next gen Roadster to be sub-3 seconds.
    Your bumping up against to limit of street tires.

    I rather see a roadster built on a Model S inspired flat battery chassis with a 0 - 60 in 3.5 seconds with a range of 600 miles per charge that a 6 foot 7 person (Me) can fit into comfortably.

  3. #63
    P7971 - VIN:5130 - 3/2/13 jerry33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,069
    Quote Originally Posted by rlawson4 View Post
    My question about the performance S vs. Regular S has to do with comfort. I ma in my car all day. I don't know much about wheels. Would I get more comfort and a better ride out of the 21" or 19" wheels? Also, do the 19" inch wheels have a longer life. If someone could explain this to me my decision will be made. Thanks in advance
    The 19" wheels will be more comfortable because they have more sidewall and they will have much longer life--perhaps double or more.

    The 21" wheels will be faster off the line, primarily because of the stickier tread compound.

    The shorter-wider contact patch of the 21" tires will deliver more g-force.

    Both will have the same contact patch area if run at the same pressure because contact patch area mostly depends upon the air pressure in the tires (and a very small amount on sidewall stiffness).

    The 19" tires will most likely be better in the rain because the tread width is narrower. In this case I say most likely because sometimes tread compound more than makes up for the increased width.

    The 21" tires will become very hard, and lose traction, when the temperature drops.
    Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demonstration.
    DISCLAIMER:
    1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
    2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
    3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by de704 View Post
    Your bumping up against to limit of street tires.

    I rather see a roadster built on a Model S inspired flat battery chassis with a 0 - 60 in 3.5 seconds with a range of 600 miles per charge that a 6 foot 7 person (Me) can fit into comfortably.
    and i thought i had it bad at 6'5"! personally I'd rather they not build another Roadster. for a small company like Tesla, it simply doesn't make sense. it's not the type of car with mass appeal. there's a reason you see way more 3-series BMWs on the road versus Z3s. it made sense for Tesla to make the original Roadster, since they could borrow the chassis from Lotus and keep the weight down. but now I'd like to see them focus on sedans and crossover vehicles. it just makes the most business sense for a company that's going to produce a limited number of models. it'd be a costly mistake to divert their attention away from this and focus on another roadster that will not approach the sales volumes of the Model S or another sedan.

    But if they wanted to, I guess it'd make more sense to come up with a coupe with hard-top convertible as opposed to a pure roadster.

  5. #65
    XP268 de704's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by onlinespending View Post
    and i thought i had it bad at 6'5"!
    That's one of the main reasons why I switched to the Model X. And when I heard you get close to the same stability & performance as Model S (and more time to save) It was a no-brainier for me.

  6. #66
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Atlanta Georgia
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by jerry33 View Post
    The 19" wheels will be more comfortable because they have more sidewall and they will have much longer life--perhaps double or more.

    The 21" wheels will be faster off the line, primarily because of the stickier tread compound.

    The shorter-wider contact patch of the 21" tires will deliver more g-force.

    Both will have the same contact patch area if run at the same pressure because contact patch area mostly depends upon the air pressure in the tires (and a very small amount on sidewall stiffness).

    The 19" tires will most likely be better in the rain because the tread width is narrower. In this case I say most likely because sometimes tread compound more than makes up for the increased width.

    The 21" tires will become very hard, and lose traction, when the temperature drops.
    Thanks. 19" for me. I need a better ride and safety is important as well. I appreciate the response.

  7. #67
    Member PV4EV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Area 51 (UK!)
    Posts
    266
    Unless I'm missing something here … surely a 19" wheel is going to give marginally better acceleration, and reduce the negative effects of unsprung weight by being a smaller diameter and lighter in weight, and be marginally more responsive to directional input, and replacement tyres are going to be easier to find than some very expensive 21" whoppers.

    I vote for 19" wheels.

  8. #68
    Model S 03182 ElSupreme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,906
    Quote Originally Posted by rlawson4 View Post
    Thanks. 19" for me. I need a better ride and safety is important as well. I appreciate the response.
    I wouldn't assume/conclude that the tires on the 19" wheels are safer than the ones on the 21" wheels.

    I am also not pretty sure both the 21" and 19" wheels are coming with equal width tires.

    I think the only thing you can assume as far as size is concerned is 19" = softer ride and less cost, 21" = harsher ride and more cost.

    As far as performance versus all-season you can assume is performance = much better grip and shorter life, all-season = less grip and much better life.

    Think with dispassion; Speak with equanimity; Act in calm.
    Moderator - Southeast, Future Cars

    Do not use this material outside of Tesla Motors Club without attribution and permission.

  9. #69
    Model S 03182 ElSupreme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,906
    Quote Originally Posted by PV4EV View Post
    Unless I'm missing something here … surely a 19" wheel is going to give marginally better acceleration, and reduce the negative effects of unsprung weight by being a smaller diameter and lighter in weight, and be marginally more responsive to directional input, and replacement tyres are going to be easier to find than some very expensive 21" whoppers.

    I vote for 19" wheels.
    Well the overall tire diameter is the 'same' for both cars. And in general wheels weigh less than tires. So going with a large wheel and smaller tire you may actually get overall weight savings. That being said you move the rim portion of the wheel further from the axis and increase the moment of inertia ... so in general I think it is a wash as far as acceleration goes. But talking about unsprung weight I think you would get less overall weight with the larger rims.

    Think with dispassion; Speak with equanimity; Act in calm.
    Moderator - Southeast, Future Cars

    Do not use this material outside of Tesla Motors Club without attribution and permission.

  10. #70
    Roadster 919, S 2006 Doug_G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7,871
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by de704 View Post
    Your bumping up against to limit of street tires.

    I rather see a roadster built on a Model S inspired flat battery chassis with a 0 - 60 in 3.5 seconds with a range of 600 miles per charge that a 6 foot 7 person (Me) can fit into comfortably.
    Yes, I'm assuming AWD.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is 4.4 seconds vs 5.6 seconds alone worth $10k?
    By Jrhodesmd in forum Model S
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 04-03-2012, 01:03 AM
  2. 300 Years of Fossil Fuels in 300 Seconds
    By teslaenvy in forum Video
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-20-2012, 12:37 PM
  3. TEG 10k
    By TEG in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 10:48 AM
  4. Wait 30 seconds - double post
    By qwk in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 07:40 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 10:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •