Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 121

Thread: Is 4.4 seconds vs 5.6 seconds alone worth $10k?

  1. #31
    Roadster 472 - S 440
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Los Gatos, CA
    Posts
    389
    PLEASE - don't make me think about it rationally! I'll never come up with a rational reason for buying the Perf. I'm trying to ignore reason until it shows up in my driveway

  2. #32
    4GETOIL S70, X47, xR913 dadaleus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Solana Beach, California, United States
    Posts
    749
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrhodesmd View Post
    is going from a 60 time of 5.6 to 4.4 really worth $10k? Is 5.6 "fast enough?"
    As a Roadster Sport owner whose previous car was a Prius, my answer is a resounding

    YES

    Why? Don't make me answer that. Just yes.

  3. #33
    If I were already getting the Sig, it'd be some what of a no-brainer at just $10k more. Unless of course you're stretching yourself thin to get the Sig, which begs the question, "why get the Sig if you're stretching yourself thin?". Personally I'd downgrade the Sig to the regular Perf, because as we all know there's a premium you're paying just for the right to have one of the first ones off the assembly line. Rather wait a couple more months for a regular Perf at about the same cost as a Sig.

  4. #34
    Roadster #1144 + Sig 114 dsm363's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,477
    I'd say if 5.6 seconds is the fastest car you've ever owned and pure acceleration isn't your main goal with the car then you'll probably be very happy. That said, get the performance

  5. #35
    Senior Member smorgasbord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    1,790
    This is the rationalization you're looking for: Resale Value.

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Delran, NJ
    Posts
    322
    The 10 K also includes the carbon fiber accents. Take a look at the interior pictures. Since I would be getting the leather, 21's, and all the other things, the it really comes out to 8.5 K, the carbon fiber is the way to go. If you really have to justify it, for that money you are getting something as fast as a Porsche 911 Carrera for the same price.

    Personally, I like the carbon fiber better so it's definitely the way to go
    Last edited by Dan5; 03-29-2012 at 04:33 PM. Reason: Carrera, not Turbo

  7. #37
    P7971 - VIN:5130 - 3/2/13 jerry33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,916
    Anyone have a guess as to what the battery longevity is between the Performance vs. Standard? Assuming that 99% of the time you're going to drive whichever one you have the same way.
    Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demonstration.
    DISCLAIMER:
    1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
    2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
    3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    153
    porsche 911 turbo : 0-60 3.5 sec
    porsche 911 carrera 4s : 0-60 4.5 sec

  9. #39
    MSP#7577 **--** MX#1891 spatterso911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA
    Posts
    1,141
    I'm coming from an ICE car already in that 0-60 range and for me this become a replacement for the previously planned replacement. A car that will likely cost around the same when introduced, if not a few grand more. If you just look at the cost as being for speed, it misses the real value of the upgrade. You are getting a Sig interior (maybe not all the color choices), 21" turbines, Upgraded nappa leather (piping and alcantara), auto air suspension, and CF inside and out for that price. It's a great deal when you consider what is in the price/performance range for any other car (ICE or not). A Porsche Carrera is also more expensive and much less practical.

    For me? I'm too addicted to the performance to not pull the trigger.

  10. #40
    Life happens Mycroft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    1,530
    Quote Originally Posted by jerry33 View Post
    Anyone have a guess as to what the battery longevity is between the Performance vs. Standard? Assuming that 99% of the time you're going to drive whichever one you have the same way.
    According to the Features page, "Model S Performance accelerates to 60 miles per hour in 4.4 seconds. If driven the same way as Model S, both cars achieve the same efficiency thanks to the unique powertrain design."

    I'm sure they mean, "if driven the same way as the standard Model S ... "

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is 4.4 seconds vs 5.6 seconds alone worth $10k?
    By Jrhodesmd in forum Model S
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 04-03-2012, 01:03 AM
  2. 300 Years of Fossil Fuels in 300 Seconds
    By teslaenvy in forum Video
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-20-2012, 12:37 PM
  3. TEG 10k
    By TEG in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 10:48 AM
  4. Wait 30 seconds - double post
    By qwk in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 07:40 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 10:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •