|
wider = more tire on the road right? I like that. Before that I was considering getting the aeros since I like the extra range benefit more than cosmetics. But the benefit of more contact with the road tips it the other way for me. And I was annoyed that I'm paying for the 21s as part of the sport anyway.
Incorrect. The amount of tire on the road is almost entirely determined by inflation pressure (There is a small amount that is determined by casing stiffness).
Wider tires mean a shorter wider contact patch. Narrower means a longer narrower one. Wider tires have more G-force at the expense of easier hydroplaning.
Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demonstration.
DISCLAIMER:
1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.
Hmm... Confused again. I assumed a 'wider contact patch' would mean better traction / shorter breaking on a dry (I'm in San Diego after all) road. Sounds like you're saying it's the same amount of contact with the road though.
Yes. The contact patch area is load per wheel divided by psi. so if the load per wheel is 1000 lbs and the tires are inflated to 50 psi (for ease of math) then the contact patch is 20 square inches. In a tire has 5 inches of tread width then the contact patch is 4 inches long (actually there is a slight ovalness to the contact patch which is dependent on the stiffness of the belts, but for rough estimating 5 x 4 will do). If the tread width is 7 inches then the contact patch length is 2.9 inches.
The trick here is "all things being equal". All things aren't equal because the tread compound and the belt construction are likely to be different between the two tires. So the wide tire may stop shorter, but that won't be due to the wider width. Tire design is actually very complex.
Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demonstration.
DISCLAIMER:
1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.
A little surfing around and I found this thread. Best bit I found and it also fits your contact patch shape explanation Jerry33:
There is more on the physics in that thread too, especially the fist post. So this sounds like a benefit to me.Probably the best, short explanation is from Paul Haney's book "Racing & High Performance Tire":
"For the same vertical load and internal pressure, a tire with a wider tread has a shorter, wider contact patch than a narrower tire. The area of both contact patches is the same if the internal pressure and the load are the same. . . A shorter contact patch at the same slip angle begins to slip at roughly the same distance from the leading edge as with a long contact patch. But the shorter contact patch has more of its length stuck to the road than the longer, narrower contact patch; and therefore a larger portion of its overall area is gripping." - Why Wider Tires Are Better, p. 101
Just remember that there is a difference between race track and real-world road conditions (and hopefully driving style). I'm pretty sure that everyone in this forum has experienced a car slipping sideways on an expansion joint during a high speed freeway exit. A wide tire will slip a lot more than a narrower one. If the contact patch is long enough there won't be noticeable sideways slippage.
Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demonstration.
DISCLAIMER:
1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.
I think that the most important factor to me would be mid-range acceleration, not just off the line speed from a dead stop. Of course, I am REALLY spoiled because my daily driver presently is a 1 series M Coupe. Most of us, probably like me, are not a teenager or an early 20's person who wants to light up the rear tires from a stop light. If the performance model has seriously increased mid-range punch, that would be a no brainer.
Last edited by rogbmw; 04-02-2012 at 11:59 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)