Page 6 of 18 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 174

Thread: ETCgreen anti-EV FUD

  1. #51
    ERIC VFX vfx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,827
    Quote Originally Posted by bonnie1194 View Post
    Seriously, you're all trying to educate someone who has no intention of listening ....
    Yes but it's a break from pointless door handle conversations.

    The world loves to be deceived.


  2. #52
    mod squad bonnie1194's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,983
    Blog Entries
    4
    I personally prefer the long thread about door alternatives.

  3. #53
    Model S 03182 ElSupreme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,828
    Quote Originally Posted by vfx View Post
    Yes but it's a break from pointless door handle conversations.
    I hear they are going to put a transmission in the Model S so the drive motor can retract the door handles. That way you can't open the door while it's moving. And to make sure there is just enough torque to get the closed all the way.


  4. #54
    mod squad bonnie1194's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,983
    Blog Entries
    4
    Nice one!

  5. #55
    Roadster #1144 + Sig 114 dsm363's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,465
    I'd like to get back to talk about perpetual motion and solar panels on the car. Back to the official Tesla forums I guess.

  6. #56
    mod squad bonnie1194's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,983
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by dsm363 View Post
    I'd like to get back to talk about perpetual motion and solar panels on the car. Back to the official Tesla forums I guess.
    I've heard that Searcher is no longer making an appearance.

  7. #57
    Roadster #1144 + Sig 114 dsm363's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    7,465
    Quote Originally Posted by bonnie1194 View Post
    I've heard that Searcher is no longer making an appearance.
    I kind of miss him. He did seem very genuine though so have to give him credit. etcgreen is probably just doing lobbying work for his employer.

  8. #58
    TSLA will win Norbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert.Boston View Post
    EVs will not serve every transportation role; for example, long-range trucking is not promising territory for EVs.
    While it may take longer for some roles, I do expect that electric transportation will also take over long-range trucking. For example, last time I checked IBM was still very optimistic about Lithium-Air. Several announcements have been made that the capacity of Lithium-Air has a potential even higher than IBM's direct goals. I'd expect that Lithium-Air will be able to provide the means for effective long-range trucking (in so far as it won't be replaced by electric trains for example).

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert.Boston View Post
    I consult with 12 of the top 20 utilities in the country, and none of them have raised this issue, at least at this level of investment.
    Also, at least two utilities have gone on record (one in South California, the other I think in the Portland area) saying that the distribution grid will be able to support a full (100%) electric fleet with modest efforts only, in relation. Yes, a number of neighborhood transformers will need upgrades. So what, they seem to in any case.
    Last edited by Norbert; 02-13-2012 at 09:06 PM. Reason: missing word
    Buying an EV is one thing, being able to drive it beyond city limits another...

  9. #59
    If biodiesel is less toxic than a tablespoon of salt, how about you do us all a favor and drink a few pints of it. Deal?

  10. #60
    Consistent evasion when facts are shown to be false or exaggerated.
    If the case for biofuels is so clear, why the lieing?

    The reason that trolls exist to push biofuel and hydrogen and other pie in the sky chemical fuel alternatives is to delay the development of an infrastructure that allows us to escape the peddlers of chemical fuel.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anti-Tesla Gibberish
    By bonnie1194 in forum Tesla Motors
    Replies: 570
    Last Post: Today, 01:27 PM
  2. More anti-ev gibberish
    By qwk in forum Energy, Environment, and Policy
    Replies: 1697
    Last Post: 05-01-2013, 11:12 PM
  3. Unsafe anti-theft chip
    By FVO in forum Video
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-11-2012, 12:45 AM
  4. Dedicated FUD attack at ABG
    By JRP3 in forum News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-07-2011, 07:57 AM
  5. TTAC Throws FUD at Tesla!
    By tonybelding in forum News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-26-2007, 11:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •