He was railing against EVs for a long time till Tesla even was worth commenting on for him.Originally Posted by Grendal
Looks like we made it.
|
|
|
He was railing against EVs for a long time till Tesla even was worth commenting on for him.
Looks like we made it.
The world loves to be deceived.
Ntrepid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From Abraxas to Ntrepid: Tracking the Pentagon operation contractor | Current Events Inquiry
Hmm., crafted in McLean, VA and deployed near Tampa, FL...
Rare double posting at Nick excellent SA posting here: http://seekingalpha.com/article/7566...readmore&ifp=0
Ramon123 seems desperate.
The world loves to be deceived.
Nick's article has this delightful cheap-shot at JP:
It's easy to think of ways to lose $7,500 - for example, you could have bought $15,000 of AXPW stock on January 26th and sold 6 months later: boom, money gone!
Moderator - Energy, Environment & Policy, TSLA Investor Discussions and New England forums
Administrator - Tesla Reservations Wiki-Map
The Truth About Cars took one of his "analyses" of the Model S and actually wrote a post on it. He is outed by others who noticed him in the comment section.
Your Tesla Mileage May Vary: Scientist Projects Drastically Shorter Range While Journalists Wait For Test Cars | The Truth About Cars
Not only was Kent "outed", but his e-mail address was published....would it be in order to post it here? (It's still available if you search for it.) Do we think that Kent would love to update his research with a few mails from EV owners?
PLEASE NOTE: Posts are the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, and are intended as part of a conversation within this forum. My words may NOT be quoted outside this forum, without my expressed consent.
Moderator: Model S, TSLA Investor Discussions, Florida and Off Topic forums
Yes I'm sure he'd be interested in factual information.
I just can't believe they referred to him as a "Scientist," when he has nothing to back it up as far as credentials. I offered to give them a different analysis, backed by my Ph.D. and publications list, but I haven't heard back from them ...Not only was Kent "outed", but his e-mail address was published....would it be in order to post it here? (It's still available if you search for it.) Do we think that Kent would love to update his research with a few mails from EV owners?
Maybe a XXX (at) XXXX dot com format.
The world loves to be deceived.
They never removed the original document.
Just go here:
http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/...l-S-ranges.pdf
And scroll to the bottom.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote