Seems they are missing the September launch date, and now targeting December:
Clean synthetic fuel plant to open in UK | TheGreenCarWebsite.co.uk
The company, chaired by green energy pioneer Tony Marmont, has built a working plant on Teesside in the UK to demonstrate the process with plans to have the facility up and running before December this year.
Professor Marmont said: “We are poised to make a huge contribution towards solving the world energy crisis by demonstrating the process of air fuel synthesis. With suitable investment and government backing, we will develop our breakthrough carbon-neutral technology to help meet the country’s significant economic and environmental obligations”.
He added: “As we move on rapidly towards large-scale manufacture of sustainable fuels, partnering with both customers and supply side organisations, the UK will be freed from its dependence on imported fossil fuels.”
The AFS system uses renewable energy (such as wind) to capture carbon dioxide and water from the air, electrolyses the water to make hydrogen and reacts the carbon dioxide and hydrogen together to make hydrocarbon fuels. The AFS process is driven by renewable electricity to make the whole process carbon neutral.
Once commissioned, AFS’ green fuel manufacturing demonstrator facility will be transported from Teesside to the firm’s headquarters in Leicestershire, for a public demonstration and press preview...
Last edited by TEG; 09-29-2011 at 04:20 PM.
Is this directly related? :
A New Way to Make Methanol Fuel | New Energy and Fuel
NonMediated Homogeneous Hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH - Ashley - 2009 - Angewandte Chemie International Edition - Wiley Online Library...What’s left out is what to do with the by-products and a needed recycling system...
As Doug says about, they think this stuff is free.The AFS process is driven by renewable electricity to make the whole process carbon neutral.
The reality is that it is competing with other energy carriers for limited renewable electricity, for funding and for real estate and that (VolkerP) is why people are right to ask the questions in this thread.
More possibly related:
Making Gasoline from Carbon Dioxide - Technology Review
Scientists Use Sunlight to Make Fuel From CO2
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture, Conversion and Utilization in Fuel Cell-
Iceland Seeks CO2 Recycling World Patent | Research Development
CO2 to Methanol Fuel in One Process | New Energy and Fuel
This isn't new... I'm sure we've discussed it in other threads. I said then, like I've said in this thread, and I'll say again now, it's a poor use of energy.
Agreed, any other way of using electricity from renewable sources than in battery electric cars is less efficient. So the subject of the thread "ICE fuel" could be dissed, except these applications where ICE fuel is extremely hard to replace due to its high energy density. Heavy road freight trucks. Tractors and combine harvesters. Light piston engine planes. Small to medium sized ships. They all use ICE and this would be a way to make them carbon neutral.
Plus we need a replacement for crude oil and natural gas in many non-energetic applications (plastics, rubber, resins, etc.) But that's stuff for another thread.
Some more data emerged on this. On their Facebook page they say:
"Our development work in the Demonstrator gives us confidence that even a 1-tonne a day plant will deliver figures better than 3 units of (renewable) energy in to one unit out in the highly usable form of liquid fuel."
"We need 3.9kg of CO2 to make one kilogram, or about 3.1kg to make one litre of gasoline... We need about 30 kilowatts of power to make one kilogram of gasoline. The main energy cost is the cost of making the hydrogen through electrolysis of water."
They say 30 kilowatts but this doesn't make sense so they probably mean kWh (which tallies with the first statement).
So do the maths and that's around 24 kWh per litre or 109 kWh per UK gallon. That's over £15 a gallon just on electricity at my domestic rates (obviously industrial would cost less but it doesn't bode well).
So what if this synthetic petrol was put in a Prius? You'd get 1.9 kWh per mile - over 6 times the energy requirement of an EV (and almost 2 times that of a hydrogen vehicle).
No wonder they don't just state the kWh per gallon figure clearly.
However, they also state:
"Across the whole system including a dedicated wind farm for example and over the 20+ year life of a plant we would expect a ratio of 1 unit in for 9 units out."
Can someone please explain this to me? Because it looks like they are now claiming to have made a perpetual motion machine.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)