Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla just changed the competitive landscape (vs Audi/Mercedes/BMW AWD Grand Coupes).

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

commasign

TeslaAdviceBlog.com
Aug 31, 2013
3,202
4,302
Davis, CA
As a followup to my previous thread (P85D is a good value (versus Audi RS7, BMW M6 GC, and Mercedes CLS63 AMG)), here are the updated comparisons of the Tesla Model S (with the latest specs) against its competitors from Audi, Mercedes, and BMW at all 3 price/performance points. It's still not a perfect comparison as the standard features vary (leather, sunroof, driver safety, etc.,), but the inclusion of AWD and much of the the previous tech package (navigation, homelink, keyless entry, etc.,) makes for a better comparison than before with the base 60 and base 85 models.

This is just an "on paper" comparison, arguably biased in favor of Tesla (this is a Tesla forum, remember?). I know people feel very strongly about fit and finish, cowhide everywhere, billions of buttons, quarter mile, engine roar, etc., :wink:


Entry


Tesla Model S 70DAudi A7 quattroMercedes CLS400 4MATICBMW 640i xDrive Gran Coupe
Horsepower329HP333HP329HP315HP
0-60mph5.2s5.6s5.5s5.2s
Top Speed140mph130mph155mph130mph
MPG/MPGe (city/hwy/combined)101/102/101 MPGe18/28/21 MPG19/26/22 MPG20/29/23 MPG
Price$75,000
($65,000 after incentives)
$68,300$68,490$81,800

Middle


Tesla Model S 85DAudi S7 quattroMercedes CS550 4MATICBMW 650i xDrive Gran Coupe
Horsepower422HP450HP402HP445HP
0-60mph4.4s4.5s5.1s4.3s
Top Speed155MPH155MPH155MPH155MPH
MPG/MPGe
(city/hwy/combined)
95/106/100 MPGe17/27/2017/24/1916/24/19
Price$85,000
($75,000 after incentives)
$82,900$75,700$93,100

Top


Tesla Model S P85DAudi RS7Mercedes CLS63 AMGBMW M6 Gran Coupe
Horsepower691HP560HP577HP560HP
0-60mph3.1s3.7s3.6s4.1s
Top Speed155MPH174MPH186MPH155MPH
MPG/MPGe
(city/hwy/combined)
89/98/93 MPGe16/27/19 MPG16/22/18 MPG14/20/16 MPG
Price$105,000
($95,000 after incentives)
$108,900$106,550$116,200

Sources:


fueleconomy.gov
teslamotors.com
bmwusa.com
audiusa.com
mbusa.com
 
Last edited:
Thank you, @commasign, very handy.

One question: why not compare the P85D against the Audi A8? I see that there's a lot of commonality in your chart between competitors' horsepower ratings, speeds, and prices. But I would've thought that the top-end P85D (maybe with options) might be viewed competitively against the A8.

Thanks,
Alan
 
Thank you, @commasign, very handy.

One question: why not compare the P85D against the Audi A8? I see that there's a lot of commonality in your chart between competitors' horsepower ratings, speeds, and prices. But I would've thought that the top-end P85D (maybe with options) might be viewed competitively against the A8.

Thanks,
Alan

I always thought of the RS7 as Audi's halo performance sedan/grand coupe. The A8 is more of a luxury car like the BMW 7 series for which there is no "M" or "RS" equivalent.
 
I can't be bothered to actually check the exact numbers but there is no chance in hell that those top speed numbers are correct for the BMW 640 and the Audi A7 quattro with 333 hp.

He's right, it's 130mph on the A7 with an asterisk stating "Top track speed electronically limited in the U.S. Always obey speed and traffic laws."
 
Those MPG-numbers of the competition ofcourse are a complete joke: like the Audi A7 going from 18/28/21 for the 333HP version to 16/27/19 for the 560HP version (RS7). That's just 10% more fuel consumption. Yeah, right.

Electric cars are known for not losing many MPGe when putting in a bigger/stronger motor, on the other hand a bigger engine in ICE cars will kill the mileage. There are lies, bigger lies and MPG-numbers.
 
Those MPG-numbers of the competition ofcourse are a complete joke: like the Audi A7 going from 18/28/21 for the 333HP version to 16/27/19 for the 560HP version (RS7). That's just 10% more fuel consumption. Yeah, right.

Electric cars are known for not losing many MPGe when putting in a bigger/stronger motor, on the other hand a bigger engine in ICE cars will kill the mileage. There are lies, bigger lies and MPG-numbers.
All Audi V8TT engines deactivate 4 of the cylinders when cruising
I was easily getting 27-30mpg when i had my S6 with 400hp+

560HP is the same engine with bigger turbos
 
Very nice chart. Yes I know there are many other variables pro and con EVs/ICEs (in my book obviously strongly biased towards a positive for EVs) but the actual data you have listed is what it is and speaks for itself! I hope you will take the time to keep this updated, and perhaps also add other manufacturers later?
 
Who cares about those numbers when all the other cars are still powered by gasoline and are millstones of past decades hanging around our necks?

Because most people want to claim that an EV is in a special category that is inferior to ICE. All along Tesla has been making cars that are made to compete directly with these ICE cars. So this chart is a great comparison to point out that Tesla really is out to go toe to toe with luxury performance cars.

I would be curious, to the OP, of the range on the cars. If I am not mistaken most of these tend to have ~300 miles of range. Just to drive home that the range of the car is also fine.
 
I would be curious, to the OP, of the range on the cars. If I am not mistaken most of these tend to have ~300 miles of range. Just to drive home that the range of the car is also fine.

Probably more like 400 miles range (20 gallons x 20 MPG). But who actually fills up their tank every night? Assuming an average daily usage of 60 miles per day (12000-15000 miles per year) and the average person refilling their tank when it gets down to 10-20%, the daily driving range is as follows:

Day 1: 400 miles
Day 2: 340 miles
Day 3: 280 miles
Day 4: 220 miles
Day 5: 160 miles
Day 6: 100 miles
Day 7: 40 miles - refuel

Versus Tesla is which is 220 miles every day (daily charge). Basically half the week, the ICE car would have a daily driving range of similar or less than the Tesla. Refueling ICE cars isn't exactly easy. Have you seen the lines at Costco?
 
Except that the P85D has less power than all of them. It doesn't even come close to 691. And at 440 KW max at full charge, it would be 590 hp assuming 100% conversion. With inverter efficiency at 93%(being generous here) and AC induction motor at 90%(again being generous), the most the P85D could be making at max charge would be 493 hp. The only reason it's 0-60 is faster, and just barely over the RS7 is because it's power band is perfectly flat so it has access to all torque at all RPMs. But in a rollon from any sort of speed, the P85D loses against all of the others in that chart.
 
Except that the P85D has less power than all of them. It doesn't even come close to 691. And at 440 KW max at full charge, it would be 590 hp assuming 100% conversion. With inverter efficiency at 93%(being generous here) and AC induction motor at 90%(again being generous), the most the P85D could be making at max charge would be 493 hp. The only reason it's 0-60 is faster, and just barely over the RS7 is because it's power band is perfectly flat so it has access to all torque at all RPMs. But in a rollon from any sort of speed, the P85D loses against all of the others in that chart.

I do like the RS7 especially after the Spock commercial. Audi better get their act together and make an RS7 e-tron.
 
Except that the P85D has less power than all of them. It doesn't even come close to 691. And at 440 KW max at full charge, it would be 590 hp assuming 100% conversion. With inverter efficiency at 93%(being generous here) and AC induction motor at 90%(again being generous), the most the P85D could be making at max charge would be 493 hp. The only reason it's 0-60 is faster, and just barely over the RS7 is because it's power band is perfectly flat so it has access to all torque at all RPMs. But in a rollon from any sort of speed, the P85D loses against all of the others in that chart.

To be fair, none of the ICE vehicles are actually putting down that much hp either...
 
Probably more like 400 miles range (20 gallons x 20 MPG). But who actually fills up their tank every night? Assuming an average daily usage of 60 miles per day (12000-15000 miles per year) and the average person refilling their tank when it gets down to 10-20%, the daily driving range is as follows:

Day 1: 400 miles
Day 2: 340 miles
Day 3: 280 miles
Day 4: 220 miles
Day 5: 160 miles
Day 6: 100 miles
Day 7: 40 miles - refuel

Versus Tesla is which is 220 miles every day (daily charge). Basically half the week, the ICE car would have a daily driving range of similar or less than the Tesla. Refueling ICE cars isn't exactly easy. Have you seen the lines at Costco?


Never heard this argument before. Makes sense.