You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Combined solar hot water/PV panels might do the trick since you could easily run hot water through them when needed.
on a side note, i think the overemphasis on reducing 'CO2" or "carbon footprint" has made the conversation far too simplistic.
i'd much rather we understand environmentalism in terms of the sum of resources that we use , and the sum of waste we produce. CO2 is just a minor distraction in the great , great diversity of wastes we produce....kinda like the simplistic belief taht recycling will save the earth (hint: it wont).
on a side note, i think the overemphasis on reducing 'CO2" or "carbon footprint" has made the conversation far too simplistic....
I agree with Bonnie. One does what they can in setting a good example. Those that keep an eye on CO2 are much more likely to have a smaller overall impact on the planet than those that ignore CO2. Not one of my acquaintances that ignores CO2 bothers to recycle anything, or has installed solar. As I tell my climate change nay-saying friends, there are still those that belong to the flat-earth society.....Of course, the elephant in the room is over population.I like to take the approach of 'add your light to the sum of light' (favorite quote from a loved movie). Recycling, solar panels, reducing my use of fossil fuels, keeping bees, large organic garden, helping others ... no, none of those will save the earth. But if we each take responsibility for our own part of the world, perhaps we can make some progress.
My approach. Everyone lives their life in their own way.
Actually, I was thinking about the panels that are currently being developed to generate electricity and hot water at the same time. The dual collection modes help justify the extra cost.I had considered that as a fluid system could also be used to cool the panels in the summer. You get ~0.5% more power for every C. The trick is making it cost effective. For a 10kW system probably needs to run <$500... that rules out a liquid system.
Of course, the elephant in the room is over population.
I can't read the specifics, but when my panels are covered, I don't get enough current to even run a light bulb. It would require backfeeding from the grid to start the process. The wiring sizes would also have to be increased to get enough heat to the panels to do some good. I suspect you might need 1500 watts per panel to do any significant melting within a reasonable time frame. But once part of the array was clear, then you might be able to use array power to finish the job. I suspect the circuitry and controllers to do this and interface with the string inverters would cost a pretty penny, though.This company proposes solar panels which can use some of the energy to melt the snow: Valsoltronic
In Switzerland, but maybe there are links to solutions in other countries.
I can't read the specifics, but when my panels are covered, I don't get enough current to even run a light bulb. It would require backfeeding from the grid to start the process. The wiring sizes would also have to be increased to get enough heat to the panels to do some good. I suspect you might need 1500 watts per panel to do any significant melting within a reasonable time frame. But once part of the array was clear, then you might be able to use array power to finish the job. I suspect the circuitry and controllers to do this and interface with the string inverters would cost a pretty penny, though.
The trick would be to keep the panel warm enough so that the snow wouldn't build up in the first place. You'd need a sensor to determine if it was snowing (no need to keep the panel warm in cold temperatures without precipitation), and a battery system to keep it warm during the snow (assumes night time or low light level). My guess is that this would take less energy than trying to clear a snow accumulation.