Here's where we are on this.
Static Fire scheduled for yesterday, but wasn't confirmed until we saw the vehicle on the pad.
Webcam feed was cut (as per usual), guarded by Gandalf (humorous), by the time they entered tanking.
Window was four hours, but we knew they could extend if required.
We know they had at least one good countdown but didn't get to ignition, OR didn't complete the static fire requirement. Now that times in with the above tweet about completing the static fire, so either that account heard the countdown, saw a puff, or classed that as complete - but I was getting notes it wasn't, per the Static Fire requirements. I *think* it's the only account classing it as a complete.
I was asking SpaceX for updates and they moved to a stance of saying they would let me know as soon as they had the Static Fire confirmation - which is usual and fine. SpaceX is very helpful towards us, but at the same time they are a commercial company and don't give running commentaries about their flows.
I asked again after we heard the Static Fire attempt didn't work out, and I was told they can't comment yet, but would when they would be able to.
Experience over previous Static Fires is they always say it's complete, when it's complete, within the hour. Usually a one liner, saying engines fired, initial data looks good, then they go into the LRR. That's all we need, so that's great. That didn't happen yesterday, with the final note saying they would let us know when they had more info.
So right now, until I'm officially told different, they didn't complete the Static Fire, and they will need to try again today if they are to protect the Friday launch attempt, I assume.
Personally I'd love it if someone turned around and provided official confirmation of a Static Fire, allowing us all to look forward to a Friday launch and a sporty core stage return, but I've covered enough of their Static Fires to know this one doesn't feel like it has been completed.
There's your update. If you want to discuss it, please use the discussion threads and I'll update this update thread when I know more.