Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

GM RecallS 778,00 Vehicles to Replace Ignition Switch After Fatal Crashes

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
From GM Recall: North America Sees Nearly 780,000 Compacts Recalled For For Ignition Trouble, Engine Failure
General Motors is recalling almost 780,000 older-model compact cars in North America because a faulty ignition switch can shut off the engines without warning and cause crashes.
....
A heavy key ring or jarring from rough roads can move the ignition switch out of the run position, cutting off the engine and electrical power, GM said in statements and documents released Thursday by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. If that happens, the front air bags may not work if there's a crash.
GM says the six fatalities occurred in five front-end crashes, all of which happened off-road and at high speeds. In each case, the ignition switch moved out of the run position, shutting off the engine and electrical power, spokesman Alan Adler said. That condition would cause the loss of power-steering assist and power-assisted brakes, he said.
...
One owner complained to NHTSA in July of last year that the engine stopped several times while a 2006 Cobalt was being driven. "Lately my car has been dying while coming to a stop or going to take off," the person wrote. "This is really scary when I pull out in busy traffic! I was almost T-Boned one day, but thank goodness I was able to restart my car in time."
...
GM's Adler said the problem was discovered when the company got reports of crashes in which the air bags did not inflate. According to GM documents filed with NHTSA, the company knew of the problem as early as May of last year.

GM recalling 778K vehicles to replace ignition switches after fatal crashes | The Detroit News

One interesting note from the article:

"GM said the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration never investigated the issue. The automaker learned of it through field reports."
Also from your article
The Cobalt and G5 have been subject to recalls before, including a 2010 recall to fix power steering systems in some 1.3 million Chevrolets and Pontiacs. That recall included 2005-2010 Cobalts, 2007-2010 G5s and other vehicles, spurred after a U.S. investigation into consumer complaints over sudden loss of power steering. In that case, GM initially had investigated the problem in 2009 and opted not to recall the vehicles, but reversed course after NHTSA opened an investigation.
 
General Motors has linked seven more deaths to its faulty ignition switch recall and added to the recall the other four GM cars using the same switch as the Chevy Cobalt and Pontiac G5 cars recalled Feb. 13.

GM on Tuesday increased the number of deaths it links to the problem from six to 13 and the number of crashes from 22 to 31 as it expanded the recall by more than 748,024 vehicles to more than 1.37 million in the U.S., plus an additional 253,519 vehicles in Canada and Mexico.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2014/02/25/gm-ignition-recall/5813539/
 
NHTSA to GM: Have you been hiding something?

In a 27-page order sent to GM Tuesday, NHTSA demanded pictures, memos, electronic communications, engineering drawings and other data to answer 107 questions about the case. The reply, which must be signed under oath by a company officer, is due April 3. GM spokesman Alan Adler said Wednesday that the company is cooperating.

NHTSA wants the documents to determine if GM delayed its response or withheld evidence. In either case, NHTSA could fine GM up to $35 million. Automakers are required to inform NHTSA of safety defects within five days of discovering them. Such a fine would be a record for NHTSA but essentially is pocket change for GM, which made $3.8 billion last year.

Included in the order are a series of questions about when GM discovered the ignition problem in 2004 and the identity of employees involved in finding and replicating it. The order asks what fixes GM considered "including the lead time required, costs and effectiveness of each of the solutions."
 
I saw a story which on NBC Nightly News which was a slightly shorter version of the article at GM Chose Not to Implement a Fix for Ignition Problem - NBC News.

In a story I heard about recently (which probably wasn't this one): Did federal regulators fail to flag complaints against GM? - CBS News says
More than 260 complaints were made during the past 11 years about Cobalts and other General Motors cars that suddenly shut off while driving, or about two complaints per month, according to an analysis by The New York Times. With GM's recall of 1.6 million cars last month, the finger pointing has begun.
The above links to Log In - The New York Times which contains
Many of the complaints detailed frightening scenes in which moving cars suddenly stalled at high speeds, on highways, in the middle of city traffic, and while crossing railroad tracks. A number of the complaints warned of catastrophic consequences if something was not done.
 
More info GM Changed Ignition Part Without Telling Drivers, Regulators - NBC News.
But evidence from a lawsuit filed by the parents of Brooke Melton, whose Chevy Cobalt spun out of control after shutting off on her 29th birthday, shows that in 2006 GM altered two internal pieces of its ignition switches in a way that would make it less likely for the ignition to shut off accidentally – and made the change without alerting the government or the owners of the cars affected.
...
Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, a watchdog group, accused GM of a “callous disregard for human life.”

"GM had an obligation under the Safety Act,” said Ditlow, “to notify the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that there was a defect, we’re correcting it, and they had the additional obligation to recall the earlier models with the unsafe part.”

Four days before the accident, according to the Meltons, Brooke’s car had shut off while she was driving and she had lost her power steering and her brakes. She was able to pull her car over and restart it. She called her father, and he said they should take it to a dealership in the morning.

Brooke got her car back from the dealership on March 9, 2010. She died in an accident the next day. “There was no doubt in my mind that it was caused by the same engine cutting off,” said Ken. The Meltons called a lawyer.
 
And no person ever gets in trouble for this. The company may get fined but not an individual. Toyota is said by DOJ to intentionally lie about their situation but the company can settle. That's probably what will happen here too.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, they are currently turning over every stone and recalling everything and anything that might, however slim, cause a problem, as a means to show their customers they are turning a new leaf/taking issues seriously/being proactive to protect their customers etc... They've also probably got a whole host of authorities up their butts.

But agreed, this is a result of many, many years of mediocrity within the entire company at many levels. It's also something that's really hard to prevent when a company gets big. Companies are made up of people, and people make mistakes, people do bad things, people don't care, etc., etc., The surprise here might simply be that it's taken so long before the big reveal signifying that people are also good at lying, cheating, hiding and keeping secrets...