Just compare the titles of the two articles.
Elon response summed up all the difficulties of REEVs well, sweet and simple.
|
Just compare the titles of the two articles.
Elon response summed up all the difficulties of REEVs well, sweet and simple.
"Success is 99% failure" - Soichiro Honda
2011 Chevrolet Volt First Drive - Car News/Green Machines/Car Shopping/Hot Lists/Reviews/Car and Driver - Car And Driver
via
What Will the Volt’s Generator Mode Feel Like? | GM-VOLT : Chevy Volt Electric Car Site
What isn’t yet clear is how the Volt will behave when the battery is depleted and the gasoline engine kicks on to provide more juice. In this so-called range-extending mode, the electric motor will be limited to the power provided by the 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine under the hood. The gas engine is never used to charge the battery; the engine turns a generator that directly feeds power to the electric motor. If the engine is revving at 2000 rpm and making 25 hp, the electric motor will only be able to make 25 hp. If more power is needed, the gasoline engine could conceivably run at its power peak at a very high rpm. Taking the point further, if the gas engine is only rated for 100 hp (our estimate of its power output), the 149-hp electric motor will only be able to make 100 hp. The upshot: the Volt will be quicker running on battery power than it will be when the gas engine is providing the electricity.
Unable to try the gas-fired solution for ourselves, we asked Posawatz how the experience will change when the battery is discharged and the gas engine kicks on. “The work being done by the development guys as we speak is to create a gentle feathering of engine rpm,” he said. “So you don’t even notice that the engine kicks in. And to try to operate at the right points and to transition the rpm points depending on the load you’re getting—to behave like someone would want it to behave. You may get into a position under an extreme grade or hill climb, where the engine rpm will be pretty loud—running pretty hard. At a certain point in time that rpm will be relatively unpleasant. This is the challenge of different road loads: how can we keep the NVH reasonable for a customer?”
I am (again) getting more disappointedin the Volt.
I had been under the impression until now that the gas engine charges the battery for use by the electric motor. Now this !
How complicated can you get ? (Leave it to GM to proving that !)
That just doesn't sound believable. I have to assume they're mistaken. That certainly isn't the original concept released and just doesn't seem to make sense...why run the ICE like that where it's RPM bounces around depending upon load and thus rarely in it's most efficient range.The gas engine is never used to charge the battery; the engine turns a generator that directly feeds power to the electric motor. If the engine is revving at 2000 rpm and making 25 hp, the electric motor will only be able to make 25 hp. If more power is needed, the gasoline engine could conceivably run at its power peak at a very high rpm. Taking the point further, if the gas engine is only rated for 100 hp (our estimate of its power output), the 149-hp electric motor will only be able to make 100 hp. The upshot: the Volt will be quicker running on battery power than it will be when the gas engine is providing the electricity.
It makes so much more sense and is conceptually more logical to run it always in a very high efficiency rpm range to charge the battery...unless they're afraid it wouldn't be able to sustain the battery SOC at times and had to change the design concept. And if that's the case, they could be on their way to failure of this concept...IMO.
EVan E. Fusco, MD
Nixa, MO
Model S R77/VIN-1267-- Black 85kWh (non-perf), Tech, Lacewood trim, tan interior, Sound Studio, Air Suspension, 19" rims, twin chargers, HPWC
PLEASE NOTE: Posts are the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, and are intended as part of a conversation within this forum. My words may NOT be quoted outside this forum, without my expressed consent.
It sounds to me that one of their design considerations was trying to reduce the engine noise. So instead of running the engine full-tilt, they run it pretty slowly (quietly) unless the drain on the battery is so high that they have to run the engine at full tilt (along with its engine noise and gas usage). If they can reduce the engine to running only at bare minimum, they will have a quieter car and can claim higher gas milage over short trips.
It also sounds like (unfortunately) people don't like the ICE to have a mind of its' own. They want the ICE RPMs to correlate to pedal position to some degree. So if you aren't accelerating, people don't want the ICE to start revving too much. Again this works against the idea of only running the ICE at most efficient RPM, and the idea of having it come on to charge batteries then shut down again once it has enough charge. Basically people want what they are used to, and so it sounds like these series hybrids are being designed to act as an EV for a while, then act as if the ICE is connected to the wheels in some way even though it isn't.
I never thought of that until you said it. But I can tell you I would be a little bit concerned if my car was always at a high speed idle even if my foot was off the gas. That would be disconcerting until you got used to it. No focus group would really have time to get used to it.
Not to mention how hard it's going to be to settle on an equitable number representing MPG (or GMP).
The world loves to be deceived.
It should be some form of energy storage like joules / mile or what ever is the best value other than joule. All energies should be converted at that rate. Amount of energy in a gallon or in a Kwh or in H2 or whatever.... center us on ENERGY used not anything else.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)