Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Rear negative camber affecting Model S range? Please weigh in!

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Taos, NM
    Posts
    43

    Rear negative camber affecting Model S range? Please weigh in!

    I know lolachampcar has detailed how rear negative camber in the Model S affects tire wear (amazing job documenting this BTW). I however would like to have a discussion on how it affects range. If you were able to change the camber to +0.5 instead of -1.5 how much range would you gain?

    I have just seen an example on the interweb of an substantial decrease in rolling resistance just by making the camber positive. In other words the car rolls farther when coasting with the engine off (like a kids box car race).

    Less rolling resistance increases range. How much range is gained is the question. I think this could add up to a surprising amount over 250 miles of driving. If one were willing to test camber vs. range perhaps watt-hours per mile on the same route at the same speed would be a good measure.

    Please weigh in! Lolachampcar would have some good insights on the possibilities. Hopefully this hasn't been discussed to ad nauseam, but this could be very fruitful none the less. Especially for drivers who need to squeeze out the extra range.

    Let the speculation begin!

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    956
    Camber has a minimal effect on rolling resistance. Toe in or out on the other hand...

  3. #3
    S85 - VIN:P05130 - 3/2/13 jerry33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    8,070
    Toe has the biggest effect on range, camber is minor if any.
    1. Do not copy anything that I post outside of the TMC forum without permission.
    2. Any advice or opinions posted here are to be taken as my personal opinions only. There is no implied warranty, fitness for purpose, or official statements from any company I may have been or am affiliated with.
    3. Even the best recommendations are wrong when used inappropriately.

  4. #4
    Senior Member lolachampcar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    WPB Florida
    Posts
    2,338
    I agree completely with drees and jerry. We would take toe out at Daytona to (dramatically) improve top speed. We had to take camber out to keep from having the tires delaminate but this did not affect top speed (rolling resistance) much. If anything, you may actually be just a tad bit faster in a straight line with the camber but do not hold me to that (never tested the theory as the body damage from a tire flailing around was too dangerous).
    P8911 ViN4288 85KW Silver Grey Obeche P85 21s Dual/Tech/Sound/Air Delivered 2/6/2013.
    P14936 Model S #2 14694 Red/Black/Black P85+ Dual Charger Solid Roof P+ 7/20 delivery.
    White/Tan S85 18201 ordered 7.26 delivered 9/2/12 (accident damage 12/12). Replacement White/Tan S85 delivered 3/5/14

  5. #5
    Senior Member wycolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    1,744
    Had pumped up tires a few days ago into max territory. This am sunny side was 51 lbs and west side was 48/49. So good to go under new paradigm. Surprisingly there was no apparent increased harshness in the ride going down the hard clay & gravel local road. On highway there was no increase in crack-slapping or other irritants. Kudos: air suspension! This with OEM Goodyears 19 inch just now being used on the car for the first time.

    With old-fashioned tires if you did this you would definitely feel & hear the increased harshness. I'm clueless but loving it.

    Model_S range is just going crazy in the warm weather and with these high pressures. The only time the curve starts to rise is when I'm actually climbing a grade. On the 'level', setting CC @65 doesn't much break the rated range line. With this new efficiency I should be able to hit the Big City 150 miles away and get by with just a 2 hour charge (30A@200V) instead of the usual 4+ hours. I'm loving it.

    Could be the moving parts are all broken in now & running smoother after 7,000 miles.

    Toe errors of course will show up immediately as 'feathering' tire wear, so this cannot be a hidden situation for long!
    --

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Negative Camber in the Rear and Expensive Tires
    By lolachampcar in forum Model S: Driving Dynamics
    Replies: 519
    Last Post: 2014-11-21, 06:35 PM
  2. negative camber on the 19's?
    By islandbayy in forum Model S: Driving Dynamics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2013-06-01, 08:17 AM
  3. How large is negative impact on battery life from MAX RANGE charging?
    By jimratliff in forum Model S: Battery & Charging
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2013-04-22, 05:43 AM
  4. What makes a Model S weigh so much?
    By nickt in forum Model S: Interior & Exterior
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2013-01-06, 09:16 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2012-10-30, 11:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •