Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

List of all June 20th announcement hints

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

deonb

Active Member
Mar 4, 2013
4,062
4,363
Redmond, WA
I've made a list of the various disclosures to date surrounding the June 20th announcements. (This was moved from nested deep in another thread).

Please reply on this thread if you have any other potential sources - I'll add it here to the top-level post to have in one place. It doesn't necessarily have to be directly related - it can be something that is regarding one of the prevaling theories for the announcement.

Direct disclosures regarding announcement:

Elon, Twitter - Apr 2:
Today's Tesla announcement is actually the 2nd in a 5 part trilogy (love Douglas Adams)
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/319119973366784002

Elon v. Betty Liu, Bloomberg - Apr 2:
And then there's a 3rd announcement that I won't quite talk about, but I think is pretty cool - except to say that if you're driving a Model S, it's right under your nose.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS2BCL6SWYI - 8:49 min
[3rd in context here is 3rd since the Lease announcement. So 5th overall]

Elon, Twitter - May 9:
elonmusk: There is a way for the Tesla Model S to be recharged throughout the country faster than you could fill a gas tank.
realbhuwan: @elonmusk yeah, we're waiting for superchargers :wink:
pjhornak: @realbhuwan @elonmusk hint that's not a supercharger
realbhuwan: @PJHORNAK doubt it is anything else.
elonmusk: @realbhuwan Don't forget the mystery announcement. Part 5 of the trilogy.
pratik_shah: @elonmusk only in US or across the globe?
elonmusk: @pratik_shah worldwide [<---- this has since been deleted]
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/332516435488280577
Tweet capture with "worldwide" from:
http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/showt...ncement/page34

Elon, Supercharger Announcement, May 29
It is sort'a a concentrated series of announcements, and I did say it was like "Five Part Trilogy". Athough, then we had intermission. And then the [billions of buy and see and made up an area?] that wasn't part of that plan. That was sort'a unexpected intermission. But after the Five Part Trilogy, named in honor of Douglas Adams, we're going to be queiet for a while so you should expect that after this announcement, there is one more on June 20th, which I think is going to be pretty exciting. That will be an in-person thing, and then we won't have anything to say for a while.
http://ir.teslamotors.com/releasedet...leaseID=767983
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yozowduql4vggzq/rDQXdo7Hqm 21:09

Elon, Stockholders meeting 6/4/2013
Q: You recently tweeted about that it may take less time charging a Model S would take actually less time than filling a tank of gas. Is the recent announcement that it is 20 minutes. Is that it now?
Elon: No. That is not it. That is not it. I would say, you should... I mentioned there will be an announcement on June 20th, in fact, not an announcement, but a demonstration. Live demonstration.
http://www.teslamotors.com/2013shareholdermeeting 40:45

Invitation to owners to attend the demonstration 6/12/2013
The filename in the URL is battswap-hero:
http://www.teslamotors.com/sites/default/files/battswap-hero_732_448.png

Elon, Twitter - 6/18/2013
Live pack swap demo on Thurs night at 8pm California time at our design studio in Hawthorne. Seeing is believing.
Video of battery pack swap will be posted to the Tesla website around 9:30pm, so those attending will see this first.https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/346895679471357952



Associated 'Prevailing Theory' disclosures:


So far the prevailing theories I'm tracking are:
  • Battery Swapping with Grid Storage
  • Aluminum Air secondary
  • Fast Charging (theory retired 6/12. Theory does not fit anymore after 'battswap-hero' filename was leaked).
I'll track more if you can plausibly associate a new theory with the 'direct disclosure' part above. Let me know.

2012 shareholder meeting
Q: I think last year you mentioned how there was a swap-out of the battery with the Model S and that could be done, I've been telling people, in under a minute potentially. So could comment about that and whether that looks like something that still has potential and when that might happen?

Elon: In terms of the Model S, I intentionally architected the Model S to have a battery pack in the floor pan that can be swapped out in under a minute. I think we're going to show something interesting in that regard. (Elon smiles, audience chuckles.) I've got to keep a few cards in the vest. But I think there will be something exciting to see in that regard.
http://www.teslamotors.com/2012shareholdermeeting 41:50


SEC 10-Q - May 10th
Other factors that may influence the adoption of alternative fuel vehicles, and specifically electric vehicles, include:
* our capability to rapidly swap out the Model S battery pack and the development of specialized public facilities to perform such swapping, which do not currently exist but which we plan to introduce in the near future;
http://ir.teslamotors.com/secfiling....54&CIK=1318605 - Page 39

Javier Verdura, Core77 - May 28:
Charging technology is only going to improve with time. Charging times will decrease significantly and range will increase accordingly. In the very near future, the argument that internal combustion automobiles are more convenient than electric vehicles will be a moot point. You will be able to arrive at a charging station with an empty battery and drive off with a full charge faster than you can fill up a gas tank.
http://www.core77.com/blog/announcem...tors_24947.asp
[The tie in is the "faster than you can fill up a gas tank" - wording that Elon used on May 9th]

Elon, Supercharger Announcement, May 29 on Grid Storage
Q: Can you explain how the Solar works for the stations that do have solar?
The general principle is that we want to generate more energy from the sun over the cause of the year than is used by Model S's that
recharge at the station. The recharing tends to be concentrated during pretty obvious times, like on a Friday afternoon and evening and on
a Sunday afternoon and evening, cause people are going somewhere for the weekend or on holidays days - that kind of thing. Whereas it sees
relatively low usage during the week. The solar panels are generating energy throughout the course of the week, and it cummulatively adds
up to more than the energy that the car consumes.

And I was thinking of saving this bit of information for a future announcement, but you do make a good point, we've kind'a had too much
news. So I'll just pack it in here, which is that we actually have grid storage going on at sort'a our SuperCharging stations. So we got
stationary battery packs that take in energy through the week from the Solar Panels and - the Solar Panels actually charge the battery
pack and then that stationary battery pack charges Model S's, and so it's actually capable of going completely off grid. And this is
something we expect to probably roll out to all the SuperCharging stations, and I think it's something that's sort'a fairly cool. These
stations will then operate even if the entire national grid goes down.
http://ir.teslamotors.com/releasedet...leaseID=767983
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yozowduql4vggzq/rDQXdo7Hqm 22:23

Long term I expect all SuperCharger locations to have Solar and Grid Storage. It's kind'a just a matter of time. In order for us to deploy
the SuperCharger locations very rapidly we have to start of with them not having Solar and then backfill the Solar over time. The
completion of the Solar is going to lag the SuperCharger network by probably 12 to 18 months and then Grid Storage is another 6 to 12
months after that, I would imagine, but these are just rough estimates.
David Baker: So how many of the Grid Storage units do you have out there, and how big are they?
Elon: We've got 2 in operation right now. They are pretty sizable. Half a Megawatt Hour, and they're capable of putting out a Megawatt if need
be.
http://ir.teslamotors.com/releasedet...leaseID=767983
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yozowduql4vggzq/rDQXdo7Hqm 39:39

Q: So how many of the Grid Storage units do you have out there, and how big are they?
We've got 2 in operation right now. They are pretty sizable. Half a Megawatt Hour, and they're capable of putting out a Megawatt if need be.
Q: Where are they located?
Actually, I'd rather not say where they are located, because I'd rather not have people go and fudging around with them. I'll tell you they're in California - there's probably only a limited number of stations. And we're actually doing this in partnership with the utlities, btw, so. The grid storage is considered a helpful thing to the utilities cause it allows them to use that pack as a grid buffer. The utilities always have a challenge of dealing with too much or too little power generation at a time, so we're able to provide that buffering capability which they like.
http://ir.teslamotors.com/releasedet...leaseID=767983
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yozowduql4vggzq/rDQXdo7Hqm 40:45

Elon, Supercharger Announcement, May 29 on Battery Swapping
Kevin: With 20 minute charges, do you see any roll in the future for Battery switching?
Elon: Well, today is about charging. I should say that I'm a big fan of optionality and I talked about battery pack swap for a long time, since
really the beginning of Tesla. And I don't think pack swap is a particularly brilliant idea. I mean, obviously we swap battery packs in
cellphones and laptops, so it's pretty obvious that such a thing can be done, at least at a small scale. The question would be could you
do it with something much larger, and then, how convenient would it be, and what are the economics like. Maybe we'll have something to say
about that in the future.
http://ir.teslamotors.com/releasedet...leaseID=767983
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yozowduql4vggzq/rDQXdo7Hqm 42:18

Elon, Supercharger Announcement, May 29 on Partnering:
Conceivably if we were to do a partnership with a major manufacturer that were interested in the SuperCharging system and are willing to use the same basic architecture, then it could be used by more than just Tesla. We're not closed to that idea. We're not trying to create some closed system as some sort of strategy or something like that. It's just that we need to solve the problem of long distance travel and we can't wait for others to agree with our strategy. If we wait for some sort of concensus, it's going to take too long. So we just need to keep going and then other manufacturers can either copy us or join us.
http://ir.teslamotors.com/releasedet...leaseID=767983
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yozowduql4vggzq/rDQXdo7Hqm 38:30

Elon, Jim Cramer interview, May 31:
@retrowallstt:
Given the downtime (20+min) at recharging stations, is there any plan to create a "customer experience" during that time?
Elon: Well, we're aiming to keep improving the charge speed, and then we got some other ideas for minimizing people's time at charge stations. But ["that's not it..."?? Maybe. What is the exact wording here? I can't decipher.]. But yeah, I think... we'll try and come up with some entertaining things over time. I mean Right now we're just really focused on expanding the Tesla stations around the country and making sure that you have the freedom to travel anywhere you want, anytime you want.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100779662 - 13:40 min

Tesla Patent 'Efficient Dual Source Battery Pack System for an Electric Vehicle', Filing Date: Dec 10, 2010:
A method of optimizing the operation of the power source of an electric vehicle is provided, where the power source is comprised of a first battery pack (e.g., a non-metal-air battery pack) and a second battery pack (e.g., a metal-air battery pack). The power source is optimized to minimize use of the least efficient battery pack (e.g., the second battery pack) while ensuring that the electric vehicle has sufficient power to traverse the expected travel distance before the next battery charging cycle.
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20120041625
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...RS=20120041625

Tesla Patent 'Electric Vehicle Extended Range Hybrid Battery Pack System', Filing date: Dec 8, 2010:
A power source comprised of a first battery pack (e.g., a non-metal-air battery pack) and a second battery pack (e.g., a metal-air battery pack) is provided, wherein the second battery pack is only used as required by the state-of-charge (SOC) of the first battery pack or as a result of the user selecting an extended range mode of operation. Minimizing use of the second battery pack prevents it from undergoing unnecessary, and potentially lifetime limiting, charge cycles. The second battery pack may be used to charge the first battery pack or used in combination with the first battery pack to supply operational power to the electric vehicle.
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20120041624
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...RS=20120041624

Tesla Patent 'Charge Rate Modulation of Metal-Air Cells as a Function of Ambient Oxygen Concentration', Filing date: Sep 22, 2010:
A system and method for charging a metal-air battery pack at the maximum possible rate while maintaining an ambient oxygen concentration below a preset concentration is provided, thereby minimizing the risks associated with generating oxygen during the charging cycle.
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20120041623
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...RS=20120041623
 
Last edited:
1/2 megawatt hours, or 500 kwh is equal to about 7 to 8 charges of an 85 kw battery at 20% capacity to full - heat loss. Even though this is an impressive amout of energy to be stored, is it enough for it to be able to operate off the grid as it was indicated it was possible? This is a great concept, and it has great benefits, but I believe it is being oversold slightly!!
 
1/2 megawatt hours, or 500 kwh is equal to about 7 to 8 charges of an 85 kw battery at 20% capacity to full - heat loss. Even though this is an impressive amout of energy to be stored, is it enough for it to be able to operate off the grid as it was indicated it was possible? This is a great concept, and it has great benefits, but I believe it is being oversold slightly!!

It is probably more useful as a way to avoid demand charges from the utility. A Supercharger is pretty much guaranteed to push you into demand charge territory. In many locations the first minute of charging for the month would cost $1000.
 
1/2 megawatt hours, or 500 kwh is equal to about 7 to 8 charges of an 85 kw battery at 20% capacity to full - heat loss. Even though this is an impressive amout of energy to be stored, is it enough for it to be able to operate off the grid as it was indicated it was possible? This is a great concept, and it has great benefits, but I believe it is being oversold slightly!!

Yes, but while it might not be able to charge many cars, 7 or 8 charges every week should be more than enough for the zombie apocalypse.

So, 1/2 MWh, say 10 batteries, 1.2MW output assuming Superdischarging. People talk about VTG, but I always though that if it were that easy, utilities would do it themselves. What they really need is a company that can make small battery clusters cost effective so they can deploy them in neighborhoods to smooth peaks, better handle domesic solar feed-in and lessen the disruption of brief outages. If only there were a comapny that could do that...

PS I think the charging thing is just something that came up with the Supercharger. I'm hoping that June 20th will see the announcement of global production, combined with the promised resolution of the winter vampire issue (as he said in Norway) plus the intoduction of the cold weather package as an option in the USA, plus a bunch of other new cool software improvements. Bsically a big "America, we told you we'd keep improving things. We have and we'll keep doing so. World, here we come."
 
Last edited:
PS I think the charging thing is just something that came up with the Supercharger. I'm hoping that June 20th will see the announcement of global production, combined with the promised resolution of the winter vampire issue (as he said in Norway) plus the intoduction of the cold weather package as an option in the USA, plus a bunch of other new cool software improvements. Bsically a big "America, we told you we'd keep improving things. We have and we'll keep doing so. World, here we come."

Do you have any plausible way to connect that theory to the 'Direct Disclosures' above? If so, I'll be happy to add your theory and find additional resources in support of it.
 
deonb

I read the patent below and wanted to add some "color". This patent specifically refers to a control system for a metal air battery where you want to prevent a high concentration of oxygen occuring. The reason to prevent an oxygen concentration is obvious (it is flammable).

In the diagrams in the patent, the metal-air cell is shown outside the vehicle. However, there can be no oxygen concentration in a battery exposed to outside air.

There would be no need for modulating a metal air battery exposed to the outside as the reaction could be basically uncontrolled. The metal air battery would discharge, recharging the Li-Ion battery pack.

BUT if you have an ENCLOSED SPACE (like the frunk), then you would have to make sure that you prevented the high oxygen concentration from occurring.

Therefore a charge rate based upon ambient oxygen concentrations (in an enclosed space) is the only consistent theory for a metal-air battery in the frunk.

In addition, the other drawing contemplates controlling this reaction from the "interface" (touchscreen).



Tesla Patent 'Charge Rate Modulation of Metal-Air Cells as a Function of Ambient Oxygen Concentration', Filing date: Sep 22, 2010:
A system and method for charging a metal-air battery pack at the maximum possible rate while maintaining an ambient oxygen concentration below a preset concentration is provided, thereby minimizing the risks associated with generating oxygen during the charging cycle.

 
Summary of BIG ANNOUNCEMENTS at Shareholder's meeting:

1. Product architecture 7 years with refresh at 3 years and redesign at 7.
2. GEN III will have the form-factor of the Model S and will try to have autopilot.
3. Gross Margins on Gen III will be lower than the 25% projected for Models S and X in order to increase market share and improve affordability.
4. minimum 40,000 units/year demand
5. going from 34 Stores and Galleries to 50.
6. Lot of opportunity in middle America
7. Will have 70 service centers which will soon show up, prior to opening, on teslamotors.com
8. Model X doors will have pinch strips and proximity sensors.
9. End of 2016 will premier Gen III
10. Elon thinks there should be an incentive program for Tesla owners who "sell" cars to their friends.
11. Quick charging is the final announcement and there will be a LIVE DEMONSTRATION on June 20.
12. 120kw charging speed is not the end of the improvements to Supercharging.
13. Zero rent or tiny rent for Supercharging.
14. Expand sales, service and supercharging to rest of world middle of 2014
 
Elon, Twitter - May 9:
elonmusk: There is a way for the Tesla Model S to be recharged throughout the country faster than you could fill a gas tank.

"Battery exchange faster than a fill up" - Diarmuid O’Connell, Tesla VP Business Development / PowerPoint Presentation Jan. 2010 (and AWD...)

battswap.png
 
I still can't get my head around battery swapping and the investment necessary to make it happen when you are already committed to the supercharging network. I can't get my head around quick charging in 10 minutes either. I guess I have to tune in on the 20th to see what this really is.
 
Definitely a "live" demonstration on the 20th. Any of the prevailing theories still work (battery swap, Al-Air secondary, super-supercharge).

I have to say, by the logic of "the simplest answer is usually correct":

1) Battery swap: hard to do in 5 min in the best of conditions, cost billions in buildout, and the market will probably consider it biting off more than tesla can chew (the media will have a field day comparing to better place). Unlikely, and stock -20% even if the strategy is brilliant. Will play out like the first financing announcement.

2) Al-Air: Very cool, if the system involved an installed lightweight frunk-based unit that allowed the user to insert Al plates in for trickle charging the main battery while driving. Essentially you are moving Icelandic geothermal power (Alcoa makes Al there because of dirt cheap electricity) to your car. You recycle the plates. New sealed Al plates could be sold at truckstops. BUT, no way the technology is ready. Stock +50% since the market would likely overestimate the value; overestimate how often it would be used.

3) super-supercharging. Simple. Existing tech and existing research. They are just going to show that if you want to put some wear on your battery you can move the "taper" to wherever you want. Elon flat said this was how you get to a 20 min charge. I think it will be a user selectable option. If you are late to a meeting you can just supercharge in 5 min, if you really want to. Something like "please don't do this more than 10 times a year" or something. Stock... meh to +5%
 
Definitely a "live" demonstration on the 20th. Any of the prevailing theories still work (battery swap, Al-Air secondary, super-supercharge).

I have to say, by the logic of "the simplest answer is usually correct":

1) Battery swap: hard to do in 5 min in the best of conditions, cost billions in buildout, and the market will probably consider it biting off more than tesla can chew (the media will have a field day comparing to better place). Unlikely, and stock -20% even if the strategy is brilliant. Will play out like the first financing announcement.

2) Al-Air: Very cool, if the system involved an installed lightweight frunk-based unit that allowed the user to insert Al plates in for trickle charging the main battery while driving. Essentially you are moving Icelandic geothermal power (Alcoa makes Al there because of dirt cheap electricity) to your car. You recycle the plates. New sealed Al plates could be sold at truckstops. BUT, no way the technology is ready. Stock +50% since the market would likely overestimate the value; overestimate how often it would be used.

3) super-supercharging. Simple. Existing tech and existing research. They are just going to show that if you want to put some wear on your battery you can move the "taper" to wherever you want. Elon flat said this was how you get to a 20 min charge. I think it will be a user selectable option. If you are late to a meeting you can just supercharge in 5 min, if you really want to. Something like "please don't do this more than 10 times a year" or something. Stock... meh to +5%

3) Interesting. But the battery chemistry is not the only issue. You also need to supply 1500 AMPS of power to the car from the SuperCharger. You can't however create a 1500 A cable that is liftable by a human, so it will have to be some beefy connection points that you'll have to install somewhere under the car that a robot can connect too.

But if you spend all the money to upgrade your car to support such a connection, you're not going to just want to do it just 10 times per year.

Good theory otherwise though.
 
I still can't get my head around battery swapping and the investment necessary to make it happen when you are already committed to the supercharging network.

The problem is it is not a big investment and it is additive, not competitive with the supercharger network.

Imagine that a base Supercharger Station is one that sources it's power from the grid. This is $150k station (per Elon's comments). Tesla can upgrade this to a solar-powered Supercharger Station for another $150k. We also know that another available upgrade is to add battery backups to take the station essentially off the grid. We don't know how much that costs, but we do know that Elon wants to do this for most Supercharger Stations in the long term (per his comments in the last conference call).

Now, imagine one final upgrade. In addition to having supercharger ports available at the station, you also have a automated swapping bay. You can either discharge a pack through a supercharger port to a car, recharging its pack, or you can just swap the packs. The number of packs you need for either solution is pretty much the same (assuming you want to go totally off the grid). The cost for the swapping bay is marginal relative to the cost of a off-the-grid supercharger and can easily be absorbed by a fee charged to those that want to use it.

It is not expensive. It does not compete with existing superchargers. It adds value to owners. It makes perfect sense in my mind.

- - - Updated - - -

1) Battery swap: hard to do in 5 min in the best of conditions, cost billions in buildout, and the market will probably consider it biting off more than tesla can chew (the media will have a field day comparing to better place). Unlikely, and stock -20% even if the strategy is brilliant. Will play out like the first financing announcement.

Please back up these claims. Why can't swapping be done in 5 mins? Why does it cost billions? Show me the math.
 
Show me the math.

Show me how the business case works. Specifically these issues:

1) Elon mentioned today that the monthly cost of SuperCharger rent is almost 0, because it's just a canopy over existing parking bays, and it draws high income customers to the business. And it's great for business because those customers have to wait for 20 minutes anyway.

How do you extend that to cover battery swapping, which is inherently about people who specifically can't wait for even 20 minutes?


2) What makes a SuperCharger and battery swap system co-exist? There has to be some draw to consumers that says: "I'm going to pick this one over the other one.". But only sometimes... since they both have to co-exist. What is that thing? (And if it's price, what is an example of a pricing structure that you'd think would work and cause balanced usage?)
 
Definitely a "live" demonstration on the 20th. Any of the prevailing theories still work (battery swap, Al-Air secondary, super-supercharge).

I have to say, by the logic of "the simplest answer is usually correct":

1) Battery swap: hard to do in 5 min in the best of conditions, cost billions in buildout, and the market will probably consider it biting off more than tesla can chew (the media will have a field day comparing to better place). Unlikely, and stock -20% even if the strategy is brilliant. Will play out like the first financing announcement.

2) Al-Air: Very cool, if the system involved an installed lightweight frunk-based unit that allowed the user to insert Al plates in for trickle charging the main battery while driving. Essentially you are moving Icelandic geothermal power (Alcoa makes Al there because of dirt cheap electricity) to your car. You recycle the plates. New sealed Al plates could be sold at truckstops. BUT, no way the technology is ready. Stock +50% since the market would likely overestimate the value; overestimate how often it would be used.

3) super-supercharging. Simple. Existing tech and existing research. They are just going to show that if you want to put some wear on your battery you can move the "taper" to wherever you want. Elon flat said this was how you get to a 20 min charge. I think it will be a user selectable option. If you are late to a meeting you can just supercharge in 5 min, if you really want to. Something like "please don't do this more than 10 times a year" or something. Stock... meh to +5%

Great summary of possibilities. I think #3 suffers not only from the size of the cable needed, but the fact that Tesla warrants the batteries - though they may theoretically be able to track your charging habits, I don't think anyone would want them playing Big Brother to make sure you didn't use super-supercharging more than X times a year.
 
Show me the math.

For the record, I hope you are correct :)

Here is my math, transcribed from the reverse of an envelope I had handy. Your deluxe stations cost 300k (bays+canopy)+say 10 battery packs (10*17k) = 470k to start. Now, your proposal is to just add a super bay that does the swapping, since the packs are there anyway. So far so good. Its basically like an automated car wash at a gas station, which also involves a moving mechanism. maybe 50k for the machine. The problem I have is real estate. it isn't just a bay, its a bay plus storage plus room to move around. Plus I think they are being opportunistic siting superchargers. LOTS of businesses will just hand over the parking spots and work with Tesla on the installation. A medium sized building is a whole other problem. Its basically like siting a small business, so owning land separate from existing SC. The cost starts to balloon closer to 1M/station. (these stations could Also be SC stations, which is so easy as to be an afterthought.) So it is something like 3x the cost to build out compared to a pure SC network.

Maybe Elon is smarter than me and has it all figured out though.

edit: "billions" was an exaggeration. 100 1M stations is a mere 100 million, (assuming 100 stations would do it) but still pricy.