Page 53 of 63 FirstFirst ... 343495051525354555657 ... LastLast
Results 521 to 530 of 624

Thread: Solar happenings

  1. #521
    ERIC VFX vfx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,828
    How much of all those benefits were paid for by the Government?

    The world loves to be deceived.


  2. #522
    Model S VIN P01536 Robert.Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Boston MA, USA
    Posts
    4,197
    @vfx: which post were you referencing?

  3. #523
    TSLA will win Norbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    3,858
    Let me split the problem in three groups:

    1) Those who buy (much) more electricity than they feed in with solar
    2) Those who feed in (much) more than the buy.
    3) Those who are about even

    Group 1 should not be a problem since they pay very much like other consumers.

    Group 2 should not be a problem since the utility, after subsidies, apparently pay a lower feed-in tariff than the the amount for which they can sell it. And solar is during day time, so selling it should not be a problem.

    Group 3 , which balances out to about zero, could pay some minimum to be "fair", but I doubt there are enough in this group to make this a real problem. It is only a burden on the infrastructure if a lot were to produce during the day and consume during the night, rather than match their own consumption. But even then, consumption off-peak helps balance the load on the power plants, which is usually much stronger during the day, so that is partially a positive effect.

    So considering what was reported above, I'd have some doubts that this is really about fairness. Is it always precisely fair up to this point? One could easily think that the real concern of utilities might be that they want to avoid encouraging solar on roofs, since that a) implies change they need to adapt to, and b) increases the amount of self-sustaining energy use, as if they had fewer customers.

    However, EVs go with solar power, and EVs mean additional demand. Or are utilities going to reduce the demand charges for EV fast-chargers? Then I'd be listening.
    Buying an EV is one thing, being able to drive it beyond city limits another...

  4. #524
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    839
    Ok, I am looking for a sticky ... can't find.

    Completely ignorant as to the how, why and where of solar.

    Illinois.

    Trying to determine how to recharge ANY EV with solar.

    Obviously I would normally be charging overnight ... so it sounds like I am SOL?

    But during the day ... how many "panels" would I need to keep the batteries charged up for either an S or a Leaf?

    Can one store the energy in batteries? And can one then use a 240v inverter to power my Level 2 chargers?

    And if I were to go all the way, and use AirCon during the day, would a size-proportioned roof full or cells be enough to stay off the grid?

  5. #525
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Angwin (Napa Valley) CA
    Posts
    361
    Quote Originally Posted by sp4rk View Post
    Ok, I am looking for a sticky ... can't find.

    Completely ignorant as to the how, why and where of solar.

    Illinois.

    Trying to determine how to recharge ANY EV with solar.

    Obviously I would normally be charging overnight ... so it sounds like I am SOL?

    But during the day ... how many "panels" would I need to keep the batteries charged up for either an S or a Leaf?

    Can one store the energy in batteries? And can one then use a 240v inverter to power my Level 2 chargers?

    And if I were to go all the way, and use AirCon during the day, would a size-proportioned roof full or cells be enough to stay off the grid?
    I am sure we have installers lurking here, but here is what I have:I put 60 125watt panels on my roof, which power my house, wells, and car. How many panels depends on how much you drive, and how much your house uses, and also how big the panels are.

    At the time CA paid half the price. I got 2 inverters, and they feed 220v into the grid during the day, and the grid pays me for day rate power. At night, I buy back cheap night rate power to charge. The goal is to have enough panels to equal your usage so your yearly bill (at "true-up") is zero. Summer you gain on billing, winter you lose some, so it is measured only once a year.

    But any reduction in electric bills is welcome: Some have only a few panels. I try to use less power at day rates (Noon to 6PM) when rates are near triple night rates.

    Where I live, there are power outages several times a year, from minutes to days. I bought a bunch of batteries (sealed absorbed glass mat, no maintenance, roughly 18 year life) and added charge controllers to my system. I *could* charge at night from my batteries, but I make more money selling day rate power to the grid and using night rate power to charge. The batteries are only for those days if and when the power is out: We never know without looking since it switches over in a few thousandths of a second. Some feel it is not worth while to add batteries, and I agree: It is purely peace of mind to know the well and other pumps will run for the 97 year old gramma who lives with us, no matter what the grid is doing.

  6. #526
    ERIC VFX vfx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    13,828
    This thread is about Solar news. There are others that help build solar systems for electric cars.

    Robert, I was referring to the power companies and the grid. Are they pulling a "Charge Point" type move y getting federal subsidies to build and then charge for smart (and dumb) grid work?

    The world loves to be deceived.


  7. #527
    Model S VIN P01536 Robert.Boston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Boston MA, USA
    Posts
    4,197
    Quote Originally Posted by vfx View Post
    Robert, I was referring to the power companies and the grid. Are they pulling a "Charge Point" type move y getting federal subsidies to build and then charge for smart (and dumb) grid work?
    Ahh... quite possibly. I'd need to go check about who got awarded what out of the big pot of DOE funding.

  8. #528

  9. #529
    Model S - P1312 MarkR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    294
    This appears to be a game changer that could revolutionize solar power production and make solar power affordable for nearly everyone. The oil companies are going to hate it. Now, if only we can figure out how to cheaply store the energy.
    "If this is the future, I'm not that worried." Jay Leno (after driving a Tesla)

    85kWh, Blue Metallic, Tan Leather, Obeche Matte, Pano Roof, Active Air, 19" Wheels -- delivered Dec 29!

  10. #530
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    946
    Seems like a technology that could be easily implemented immediately for any type of silicon solar cell.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Solar Garage Anyone?
    By mikevbf in forum Model S: Battery & Charging
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-17-2012, 02:22 PM
  2. Solar City and non-Solar City areas
    By efusco in forum Charging Standards and Infrastructure
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-17-2012, 12:11 PM
  3. Solar power without solar cells
    By S-2000 Roadster in forum Energy, Environment, and Policy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2011, 09:02 PM
  4. Solar Roads
    By kgb in forum Energy, Environment, and Policy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-20-2010, 01:06 PM
  5. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-11-2008, 06:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •