Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 345678910 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 92

Thread: Model S vs. E63 AMG Mercedes 0-110 mph race

  1. #61
    Member Johann Koeber's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Nuremburg, Germany
    Posts
    156
    I am wondering about range of the MS on the Autobahn.

    Fact is, I am guilty of driving fast when situation (traffic, weather, speed limit) allows it. My current car is capable of 250 km/h (better than 155 mph), but I very seldom go over 180 km/h (112 mph), because it strains my concentration. Even when I set my cruise control to this speed (180, which is the fastest it will lock in), when I look at my average speed during a 2 hour trip, I seldom get more than 120 km/h (75 mph). After 2 hours I usually take a break.

    So. I am looking forward to testing the real range under these circumstances (MSP, obviously 85 kWh). My guess would be 350 km should be possible on a full (range) charge, 300 km on a standard charge. This would make me happy. If I need more range, I will have to cut off the peak speeds - just set the cruise control to 160 or 140 should give about 10% more range each step.

    This car is about acceleration. I canīt wait to do the test in real life and post the results here. Stay tuned 6 months from now ...
    Last edited by Johann Koeber; 01-30-2013 at 08:09 PM. Reason: Typo
    complete Tesla family: Roadster EU VIN 968, EU SP P#233, EU X P#85

  2. #62
    Member AustinPowers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Frankfurt (Main), Germany
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by Johann Koeber View Post
    My current car is capable of 250 mph...
    What on earth is your current car? Bugatti Veyron? If so, congrats, man!

    Or did you mean 250 kph?

  3. #63
    Member Johann Koeber's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Nuremburg, Germany
    Posts
    156
    No, km/h, sorry

    I don't like the Veyron because of range and maintenance cost
    complete Tesla family: Roadster EU VIN 968, EU SP P#233, EU X P#85

  4. #64
    Member AustinPowers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Frankfurt (Main), Germany
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by Johann Koeber View Post
    No, km/h, sorry

    I don't like the Veyron because of range and maintenance cost
    Don't forget the abysmal cargo volume

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by ElSupreme View Post
    While it is true that ICEs have varying efficiency across their speed (rpm) range, this isn't really true for AC induction motors. They are pretty much equally efficient across their whole range (with maybe their last 5% of speed dropping a percentage point or two). The maximum power drops off at high speeds, but efficiency stays above 90%. Adding a transmission would introduce more losses than you would see gains. The only thing a transmission would afford a EV is greater range of speeds.
    You get higher possible speeds with a transmission because the gearing gives you a mehanical advantage, such that a given power output by the motor will allow the car to go progressively faster as you switch gears.

    The relative efficiency of the motor doesn't matter when discussing mechanical advantage. If you can go faster at any fixed power output, that necessarily means you will go farther at that power output, meaning you are more efficient.

  6. #66
    Model S 03182 ElSupreme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,903
    Quote Originally Posted by CapitalistOppressor View Post
    You get higher possible speeds with a transmission because the gearing gives you a mehanical advantage, such that a given power output by the motor will allow the car to go progressively faster as you switch gears.
    This is true. But your post mentioned efficiency directly. See below for some more.

    Quote Originally Posted by CapitalistOppressor View Post
    The relative efficiency of the motor doesn't matter when discussing mechanical advantage. If you can go faster at any fixed power output, that necessarily means you will go farther at that power output, meaning you are more efficient.
    The Tesla does NOT have a fixed power output. Same for your ICE. If you put a second gear on a Tesla the motor will run slower, but more torque will be required. Power is basically torque times motor speed (motor). When you change gearing you drop speed by the same factor you increase required torque, the net result is an equivalent amount of power required regardless of what gear you are in.

    Because the motor in a Tesla is equally efficient (or very close) at 5,000 rpm, and 10,000 rpm a transmission wont increase efficiency Lets say you need 100 lb/ft of torque (at the motor in 1st gear) to maintain speed. You have a second gear that is twice as tall. You can half your motor speed by shifting, but you now require 200 lb/ft of torque (at the motor in 2nd gear). Power requirements are the same rpm*100 or 1/2rpm*200 in both cases. This is why you don't start in 6th gear. You need more torque towards the wheels.

    Gearing won't give you more range. It will give you more speed at the cost of acceleration, or vise versa. And it will allow you to pick your engine/motor speed but by itself won't give you efficiency.

    The reason why ICEs have transmissions is because their torque and power are highly variable over different engine speeds, as well as their efficiency.

    I have a bicycle with 20 gears on it but I can tell you it takes the same amount of power in each gear to go a given speed. Sometimes it is easy to push the pedals but you have to spin like mad. Or you can setup it up like doing leg presses but you don't do very many of them. Again those are for hitting an efficient spot for muscle movement use slow twitch muscle (as fast as it will work) with as little resistance as possible.

    Think with dispassion; Speak with equanimity; Act in calm.
    Moderator - Southeast, Future Cars

    Do not use this material outside of Tesla Motors Club without attribution and permission.

  7. #67
    Member PeterSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Netherlands, Deventer
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by Johann Koeber View Post
    I am wondering about range of the MS on the Autobahn.

    Fact is, I am guilty of driving fast when situation (traffic, weather, speed limit) allows it. My current car is capable of 250 km/h (better than 155 mph), but I very seldom go over 180 km/h (112 mph), because it strains my concentration. Even when I set my cruise control to this speed (180, which is the fastest it will lock in), when I look at my average speed during a 2 hour trip, I seldom get more than 120 km/h (75 mph). After 2 hours I usually take a break.

    So. I am looking forward to testing the real range under these circumstances (MSP, obviously 85 kWh). My guess would be 350 km should be possible on a full (range) charge, 300 km on a standard charge. This would make me happy. If I need more range, I will have to cut off the peak speeds - just set the cruise control to 160 or 140 should give about 10% more range each step.

    This car is about acceleration. I canīt wait to do the test in real life and post the results here. Stay tuned 6 months from now ...

    Johann you will not get 300km range at 180km/hr. You can drive 130km/hr maximum if the Tesla-stats are correct - an I expect them to be. So fast acceleration yes, 180km/hr on cruise control for long distances, no.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Another thing - did they use the launch-control in the AMG??

    Usually that means that the engine sits at 4000rpm and the car takes care of the rest as soon as you release the brakes - or some similar procedure. In the vid it seems the Merc starts at very low revs - not launch control.
    But I believe that even with use of LC on the Benz the Model S would still have beaten it - albeit with a smaller margin. The same goes for the M5 and the Viper I believe. It just would have been a fairer comparison to completely silence all ICE-fan comments.

    Tesla Model S - resistance is futile.
    Model S 85kWh Performance+ #852 estimated delivery AUG/SEPT
    Grey, Tan, Obeche matte, Pano, 21" silver, Performance Plus, Spoiler, Tech, Sound, P-sensors, Winter, Security
    Soon a Petrolhead on sundays only


  8. #68
    Launch control in the AMG is worthless, the car has so much torque you can't even get off the line from idle without spinning on the street.... Viper never had launch control until the latest 2013 model....

    that E63 now has a tune running 730HP and it killed the Tesla at the track running 11.1 @ 129 MPH....


    Quote Originally Posted by PeterSZ View Post

    Another thing - did they use the launch-control in the AMG??

    Usually that means that the engine sits at 4000rpm and the car takes care of the rest as soon as you release the brakes - or some similar procedure. In the vid it seems the Merc starts at very low revs - not launch control.
    But I believe that even with use of LC on the Benz the Model S would still have beaten it - albeit with a smaller margin. The same goes for the M5 and the Viper I believe. It just would have been a fairer comparison to completely silence all ICE-fan comments.

    Tesla Model S - resistance is futile.
    2013 Tesla Model S P85, Red Multi, Black, CF, Pano, Sound, 21" Grey, Tech, Dual Chargers, Paint Armor
    2012 Tesla Model S P85 12.3 @ 110.8 MPH <--- Video - SOLD

  9. #69
    Member PeterSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Netherlands, Deventer
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by fiksegts View Post
    Launch control in the AMG is worthless, the car has so much torque you can't even get off the line from idle without spinning on the street.... Viper never had launch control until the latest 2013 model....

    that E63 now has a tune running 730HP and it killed the Tesla at the track running 11.1 @ 129 MPH....
    Is there of vid of that??
    Model S 85kWh Performance+ #852 estimated delivery AUG/SEPT
    Grey, Tan, Obeche matte, Pano, 21" silver, Performance Plus, Spoiler, Tech, Sound, P-sensors, Winter, Security
    Soon a Petrolhead on sundays only


  10. #70
    Model S - Sig. 283 EU
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Gelderland, The Netherlands
    Posts
    419
    Quote Originally Posted by fiksegts View Post
    Launch control in the AMG is worthless, the car has so much torque you can't even get off the line from idle without spinning on the street.... Viper never had launch control until the latest 2013 model....

    that E63 now has a tune running 730HP and it killed the Tesla at the track running 11.1 @ 129 MPH....
    The problem with cars like the AMG is that they need launch control.

    The E63 is generation how much and perfected version how much of a proven and evolved model? The Model S is a car that came out just half a year ago. Wait till Tesla (or a tuner) comes up with a Model S Super Performance that is lighter, has a more powerful inverter, etc.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Electric Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Sportscar
    By dpeilow in forum Electric Vehicles
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 06-07-2013, 11:13 AM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-29-2013, 06:49 PM
  3. Model S 85kwh - Mercedes S550 comparison
    By Zythryn in forum Model S: Driving Dynamics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-26-2012, 04:32 PM
  4. Mercedes Benz SLS AMG eDrive
    By dpeilow in forum Electric Vehicles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 01:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •