Thanks, will do. I need to get a couple of quotes next, so will see what the difference is.
|
Thanks, will do. I need to get a couple of quotes next, so will see what the difference is.
Delivered Feb 8 2013 - 85Kwh/Dolphin Grey/Pano/Tech/Sound/Air/shelf/HPWC
The major difference is that a 50A circuit can be placed on type NM-B 6/3 cable, while 100A requires THHN/THWN #3 in a conduit. The wire cost difference is roughly 2x the cost, but you have to figure in the conduit and installation for that conduit. If it is a short run (40' or so) your materials difference may only be $200. But if you're looking at a long run, you could have a significant expense in the different, and then you'll need to consider whether you'll use the high current or not.
pete8314: I would still check this with a licensed electrician familiar with your local code requirements. My entire materials bill was $453. I had 40 feet of conductor in 1 1/2 conduit, 20 feet of wire from the load center to a junction box where it changed to conduit and conductor plus a new sub-panel and the wire and breaker and connectors. I am not thinking that I would have saved very much by installing a 50 Amp circuit.... again, I am not an electrician.
I also ran a 100amp subpanel to my garage and then a NEMA 14-50 outlet off that. This I can now easily run another outlet for my wife should she also get an EV.
P1117 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
PLEASE NOTE: These musings are the copyrighted intellectual property of the author, and are intended as part of a conversation among the Tesla Motors Clubs membership. My words may not be quoted by any third party outside the Tesla Motors Clubs forums, without my expressed consent.
Your materials bill will be considerably less if you can use NM-B inside a wall. Wire cost is roughly half, plus you save the cost of the conduit. If you can't run inside a wall, Romex must be run inside conduit to protect it, so your only cost difference is the wire cost ($118 for 50' of 6/3 vs. $232 for 200' of #3).
- - - Updated - - -
This is a good strategy if you think you'll need an EV at some point. I fed a 125A subpanel from my main panel, and that gives you room for an HPWC @ 80A + a 14-50 @ 40A. But that's because I know I need a high-amp charging solution - the cost differential would be several hundred dollars.
It's similar to the HPWC vs. 40A charging arguments -- every case is different and if you have the money it doesn't hurt... but for some people it's an extra $300 or so.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)