Page 17 of 33 FirstFirst ... 713141516171819202127 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 330

Thread: Audi EV

  1. #161
    Administrator dpeilow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    7,410
    Cool. Wonder if it charges with 3 phase?

  2. #162
    Quote Originally Posted by JRP3 View Post
    Depending on how much of the pack they actually use it could get over 100 miles at 250 wh/mi. They may simply be more realistic with their range figure than most. Unless you do an EV from scratch it's going to be hard to fit much more than 100 miles worth of batteries in your average vehicle.
    Well for a 100 mile range at 250 Wh/Mile consumption, and an energy density of 250 Wh/L, you'd only need 100L of battery space, I suppose you need to maybe scale that up some for casings and cooling space but generously maybe to 130L? That's about a tenth of a cubic metre plus a little bit as a rough guess. Surely that doesn't use all of the space freed up by removing the engine, gearbox, driveshaft and exhaust tunnel?

    Edit: Just seen the diagram from TEG. Looks like it does use all the space! Very narrow underfloor module though.
    Last edited by JimmWilks; 04-11-2011 at 12:47 PM. Reason: New information relevant to original posting.

  3. #163
    Quote Originally Posted by dpeilow View Post

  4. #164
    A lot of these conversions seem to use the T-shaped battery, even the Leaf. Highlights how efficiently packaged the Model S battery is.

  5. #165
    The Leaf battery isn't really "T-shaped":

    It is shaped to fit humps under the seats.

  6. #166
    Quote Originally Posted by TEG View Post
    The Leaf battery isn't really "T-shaped"
    Ah ok so it isn't, I didn't check before posting, and was relying on my apparently faulty memory! Actually looks like quite efficient packaging also.
    Name:  leafbatt2-600x288.jpg
Views: 107
Size:  30.3 KB
    Judging by this picture, it looks efficiently packaged but TINY compared with the Model S battery size. I suppose with the range difference that is to be expected. Still, if I were building an EV, I would be tempted to fill all available space with battery.

  7. #167
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmWilks View Post
    Judging by this picture, it looks efficiently packaged but TINY compared with the Model S battery size. I suppose with the range difference that is to be expected. Still, if I were building an EV, I would be tempted to fill all available space with battery.
    I think Nissan put less battery than they could because they were targeting a low price of entry with range on the low side.
    If you need a bit more range, and want to spend more you could look at a CODA.

  8. #168
    Senior Member JRP3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central New York
    Posts
    4,528
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmWilks View Post
    Still, if I were building an EV, I would be tempted to fill all available space with battery.
    It's tempting, until you have to pay for it. I could have put 100 miles worth of battery in my conversion but I didn't want to double my battery cost for range I didn't really need. Nissan probably came to the same conclusion.

  9. #169
    Senior Member Jaff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Grimsby, Canada
    Posts
    1,544
    Still, it makes me wonder why Nissan didn't offer more battery as an option though...I'd bet some Leaf buyers would have elected to purchase a higher range battery.

    Quote Originally Posted by JRP3 View Post
    It's tempting, until you have to pay for it. I could have put 100 miles worth of battery in my conversion but I didn't want to double my battery cost for range I didn't really need. Nissan probably came to the same conclusion.
    Roadster # 1137 / Model S # 2120

  10. #170
    Senior Member JRP3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central New York
    Posts
    4,528
    They are having enough trouble just making enough of one model. You can't just drop some extra cells in place and call it a day, you either have to add cells in parallel to each existing module to keep voltage the same or you add modules in series, which increases voltage, which might be more than the controller, DC/DC, and charger are made to handle. Plus the suspension might have to be different to handle the extra weight, and it might even call for more crash testing because of that.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Audi R8 E-tron EV track record
    By kenliles in forum Tesla Motors
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2012, 04:58 PM
  2. Model S Performance vs Audi S7
    By AnOutsider in forum Model S
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-29-2012, 07:38 AM
  3. Audi EV
    By vfx in forum News
    Replies: 268
    Last Post: 06-15-2012, 07:06 AM
  4. Audi says they are more fun
    By vfx in forum Video
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-22-2009, 05:28 AM
  5. Audi R8 vs Roadster
    By TEG in forum Cars and Transportation
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-04-2009, 10:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •