Quote:
Originally Posted by doug The claims are pretty ridiculous, ... |
Isn't it ironic that these Shelby guys are in West Richland WA,
Nearby the Hanford Nuclear Site, and Land of the Glowing Jackrabbit?
SSC could (theoretically not unfeasible) continuously 24/7 charge the batteries from a tiny nuclear atomic reactor.
Going with a tiny reactors as loader for a battery in a car would neither be technical miracle neither (if you look close) nor a big hazardous unknown.
All the satellites have such mini-nuclear- power-supplies (radioisotope thermoelectric generators) since the sputnik thought.
The technology is well understood since decenniums-
besides the fact that a satellite do not crash on a crammed highway releasing possibly hazardous rays- at least not often.
Funnily - a radioisotope thermoelectric generator is compared to a half empty gas tank a much safer option.
The alpha radiation from both isotopes emitted in case of a leakage will not penetrate the skin, but can irradiate internal organs if plutonium is inhaled or ingested. Thats prevented by inserting the material into ceramics.
More from wikipedia - quote
To minimize the risk of the radioactive material being released, the fuel is stored in individual modular units with their own heat shielding. They are surrounded by a layer of iridium metal and encased in high-strength graphite blocks. These two materials are corrosion and heat-resistant. Surrounding the graphite blocks is an aeroshell, designed to protect the entire assembly against the heat of reentering the earth's atmosphere. The plutonium fuel is also stored in a ceramic form that is heat-resistant, minimising the risk of vaporization and aerosolization. The ceramic is also highly insoluble.
---unquote
It may be pretty hard to get the ok & sign from the regulator but its not unfeasible to bring a nuclear driven steam-turbine-battery-loader into a car.
When the Gallon hits 10$ and above a lot of things will be possible never thought of.
AND that would make SSC's claim of years without recharging the battery from the grid / connector not ridiculous but modest.
Because 23 years after production, such an RTG would still produce 83.4% of its starting capacity....