Click here to advertise in this spot!

Go Back   Tesla Motors Club Forum > Electric Performance Forum > Electric Cars

Electric Cars Discussion about Electric Cars other than Tesla Motors


Welcome to the Tesla Motors Club Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

GM Fully Committed to E-Flex & Chevy Volt
Old 11-14-2007, 11:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
tonybelding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 863
Icon14 GM Fully Committed to E-Flex & Chevy Volt

AutobogGreen brought this to my attention. . .

http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/11/14/my...n-to-bob-lutz/

The funny part was the comment about aerodynamics.

The more important part was that GM is "fully committed" to Chevy Volt production and no longer sees much likelihood that battery technology will be a hindrance.

It's been great to see how GM's (particularly Lutz's) attitude has changed over a relatively short time. When they first showed the Chevy Volt, the talk was all about how this represented something they'd like to do someday but "the batteries don't exist yet". That brought forth a lot of skepticism and even ridicule.

After the huge public response, I think GM felt compelled to look closer at the idea, and the closer they looked the more doable it seemed to be. You can follow the changing attitude in their public comments, which started out very timid and full of caveats and disclaimers, but every new comment from GM has been more confident than the one before.

Now they've reached a point where batteries don't look like a problem, and Lutz is talking casually about producing up to 100,000 units in the first year. If it even hits a quarter of that production level it'll send a shock wave through the auto industry.
tonybelding is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 12:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,389
There are still many who are very skeptical about the Volt.
Don't forget that this is GM, and they could draw everyone into their "vision", then cancel it like they did with the EV-1.

Until they are mass producing Volts and offering them for sale, I will remain dubious.

Also, they better get much better MPG than a Prius...
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 01:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
DDB
Senior Member
 
DDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEG View Post

Also, they better get much better MPG than a Prius...
Why? If you drive in all electric mode, you don't burn any gas? I could care less if it burned 20 MPG in gas mode if I get 40-45 miles EV range.
__________________
Dave

'05 Passat powered by Biodiesel
'54 Corvette
DDB is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 04:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
vfx
Senior Member
 
vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ca
Posts: 1,379
Wow this makes me optimistic.

Cautiously optimistic, but still optimistic.

Another comment of note is letting a civilian drive a Mule. Considering this person is a member of the press (a Blogger) that shows trust from GM.

I have not followed the auto world to know if there is any precedence for this. I would have to believe it's pretty rare.

Even Tesla did not have that kind of play in the public eye
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
vfx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 05:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,389
GM more or less said that the excitement from Tesla helped prompt them to put the Volt concept into the public space as a response.

I suspect that the Volt blogs are also a retort to the success of the Tesla blogs.

I am sorry, but personally, I don't find the Volt (in its' current form) exciting enough for me to want to join that community.

Quote:
If you drive in all electric mode, you don't burn any gas? I could care less if it burned 20 MPG in gas mode if I get 40-45 miles EV range.
Someone will have to work up the numbers of real world plug-in usage combined with pure EV mileage equivalent and actual MPG when running on gas (factoring in how often the gas motor will be used on average). There will be some sort of "effective MPG" that results, and that is what I would hope/expect to be much better than a Prius for this to be worthwhile.

If it turns out that 90% of Volt customers never plug it in it might not be that great a concept...
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 06:06 PM   #6 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
tonybelding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEG View Post
GM more or less said that the excitement from Tesla helped prompt them to put the Volt concept into the public space as a response.
I think Bob Lutz admitted that. I can't help thinking Toyota's much more low-key announcement that they were going to make a PHEV must have influenced GM's decision too. It didn't get much press at the time, but when Toyota makes a move other car makers take notice.


Quote:
I suspect that the Volt blogs are also a retort to the success of the Tesla blogs.
I don't know if "retort" is the word I'd choose. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Oddly, Tesla and GM (notably in the persons of Martin Eberhard and Bob Lutz) seem to have plenty of good things to say about one another. I sense that there is some mutual admiration and a sense that they're both on the same side of the revolution.

It's a contrast to the sniping that so often occurs between the various EV startups.


Quote:
I am sorry, but personally, I don't find the Volt (in its' current form) exciting enough for me to want to join that community.
I personally don't have any interest in buying one. Also, I find the Volt's styling unattractive. However. . . I do believe it could appeal to a lot of people and be the start of something big.


Quote:
If it turns out that 90% of Volt customers never plug it in it might not be that great a concept...
I have a hard time believing in that scenario. If they didn't intend to plug it in, why buy a Volt in the first place? I'm confident plugging in will prove more convenient for most people (at least those who have a garage or carport) than going to a gas station. I'm also confident that many of them will become addicted to quiet battery-powered driving and will feel quite annoyed when the ICE fires up.
tonybelding is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 06:21 PM   #7 (permalink)
DDB
Senior Member
 
DDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
Supposedly Lutz gave a November 2010 production date with a 2011 model year:

http://www.gm-volt.com/

Pretty cool.
__________________
Dave

'05 Passat powered by Biodiesel
'54 Corvette
DDB is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 07:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
TEG
PV->EV
 
TEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,389
Quote:
Oddly, Tesla and GM (notably in the persons of Martin Eberhard and Bob Lutz) seem to have plenty of good things to say about one another. I sense that there is some mutual admiration and a sense that they're both on the same side of the revolution.
I will just have to reserve judgment and sit on the sidelines and see what happens. The whole EV1, & Cobasys situation has me questioning motives or at least resolve until proven otherwise.

Quote:
I have a hard time believing {many people won't plug in the Volt}. If they didn't intend to plug it in, why buy a Volt in the first place? I'm confident plugging in will prove more convenient for most people (at least those who have a garage or carport) than going to a gas station. I'm also confident that many of them will become addicted to quiet battery-powered driving and will feel quite annoyed when the ICE fires up.
Lets hope you are right. I do see silly things like people buying 4WD vehicles with large ground clearance and never driving them off road. Or buying a 5 passenger luxury sedan and only ever having one or two people in it.
TEG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-14-2007, 08:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
vfx
Senior Member
 
vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ca
Posts: 1,379
"GM more or less said that the excitement from Tesla helped prompt them to put the Volt concept into the public space as a response"

I think we have to give credit to "Who Killed The Electric Car" for the Volt as well. I know that Bob has admitted that Tesla forced his hand with the Volt but WKTEC had to smart like a mutha.

Oh to be a fly on the hallowed walls of GM when WKTEC came out. Did they get a preview copy? Did the execs put on overcoats and hats and sneak into the theaters? Did any heads roll? We will probably never know.

I know I felt a lot of strong feelings about GM when I saw the film and now we know "Flea" and Jason were moved to buy a Tesla (and who knows how many more did the same). Jason went on to say he would never buy another GM product.

Lutz has said that crushing the cars was a bad PR mistake and I bet that started as a slow stew that rose to a boil as the film did better and better. 1.6M http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/...lectriccar.htm Then the DVD release saw another stinging wave into GM's offices.

The Volt might have been part of the healing salve that Bob needed to feel good again.
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
vfx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-16-2007, 10:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
vfx
Senior Member
 
vfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ca
Posts: 1,379
Another comment on GM's transparency on the Volt.

Autoblog Green says they may get to drive the Mule. The ground breaking is so unheard of that AG even has to explain what a Mule is.
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/11...n-cars-on-sma/


And this interview:
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/11...ate-of-charge/

Pre-Tesla this kind of access would either be a total fluff piece or would be a clandestine operation. I'm impressed.
__________________
.
.
.
.
.
.
The world loves to be deceived.
vfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Information Week: Electric Cars: Inside Chevy Volt, Tesla Roadster dpeilow News, Articles and Events 1 08-29-2008 10:52 AM
Chevy Volt May Use NIMH Battery Jeff Electric Cars 6 03-28-2008 08:55 AM
EngineeringTV: Chevy Volt TEG Video 1 10-12-2007 06:23 PM
Scott Adams trashes the Chevy Volt tonybelding Electric Cars 1 02-14-2007 11:59 AM
TECH.BLORGE.com compares Chevy Volt with Tesla Roadster tonybelding Tesla Roadster 0 01-10-2007 05:11 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 PM.

Sponsors
Click here to learn about advertising!


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |
Teslamotorsclub.com is in no way sponsored, endorsed, or affiliated by or with Tesla Motors, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries, suppliers, or vendors. ‘Tesla Motors’ and ‘Tesla Roadster’ are trademarks of Tesla Motors, Inc.
Click here to learn about advertising!